NURS 6201 Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare Week 8 Discussion Coaching, Mentoring, and Effective Feedback

NURS 6201 Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare Week 8 Discussion Coaching, Mentoring, and Effective Feedback

NURS 6201 Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare Week 8 Discussion Coaching, Mentoring, and Effective Feedback

NURS 6201 Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare

Week 8 Discussion

Coaching, Mentoring, and Effective Feedback

Online Nursing Essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NURS 6201 Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare Week 8 Discussion Coaching, Mentoring, and Effective Feedback done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

According to the ANA Peer Review Guidelines position statement, “As the professional association for nursing, ANA has a responsibility to the public and its members to facilitate the development of a quality assurance system including peer review.” Each nurse has a responsibility to engage in collaborative decision-making processes, self-evaluation of individual performance, and evaluation of others’ performance.

In this Discussion, you will compare aspects of peer feedback vs. peer review and how these practices apply to effective nursing practice.

Photo Credit: Getty Images

To prepare:

Review the Resources, particularly the Wolf et al. articles.

Reflect on the AONL Competencies on Leadership and Professionalism.

Consider the following scenario:

You are a charge nurse and one of your direct subordinates is also a personal friend of yours. You have noticed a decline in her/his professional performance as witnessed by tardiness, delayed patient response, failing to complete documentation, and altered peer relationships.

By Day 3 of Week 8 (Post First)

Explain how you would mentor and coach the subordinate nurse in the scenario. Specifically address the following:

Explain your expectations of the performance the nurse should be demonstrating.

Explain the type of feedback you would provide to the nurse. Be specific and provide examples grounded in the Resources on coaching and mentoring.

Explain how the AONL Competencies on Leadership and Professionalism and the ANA Magnet Standard on peer feedback support would inform your feedback choices.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond

NURS 6201 Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare Week 8 Discussion Coaching, Mentoring, and Effective Feedback
NURS 6201 Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare Week 8 Discussion Coaching, Mentoring, and Effective Feedback

to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Post to Discussion Question link, and then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember that once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts—and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Week 8

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days in one or more of the following ways:

Explain other performance expectations that you would recommend the nurse exhibit.

Provide suggestions on resources to support professional development of the nurse being mentored/coached.

Also Check Out: NURS 6201 Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare Week 6 Discussion How Do You Deal With Conflict?

Explain insights you gained about challenges and opportunities related to mentoring and coaching.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6201 Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare Week 8 Discussion Coaching, Mentoring, and Effective Feedback

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

 

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.