NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison

https://www.onlinenursingessays.com/nur-550-evidence-based-practice-project-proposal-research-design-comparison/

Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

 

  < Nephrology Research> < The distinction between structured (practical) and unstructured (theoretical) research in clinical trials > Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology  

The T1, T2 and T3 translational studies compel the researcher to directly participate in the study variables with the sole intention of achieving the research objectives. The research full controls both the independent and dependent variables throughout the life of the study. For each of the three studies, the following methodologies are seen:

T1: Case studies, Phases I & II Clinical Trials, and observational studies.

T2: Phase IV Clinical trials, Diffusion research, Dissemination research and Implementation Research.

T3: Evidence synthesis, Guidelines, Observations, and Phase III Clinical Trials

 

 

 

 

Traditional practices also have their own methodologies. They are different as thus:

Qualitative: Boyack et al. (2014) reveals that qualitative studies have adopt observations, focus groups, observation, and individual depth interviews to obtain data.

Quantitative: These studies utilize methods such as surveys, simulations and audits to get data.

Translational research and traditional research are complex endeavors that lead to the adoption of hypothesis in order to formulate clinical decisions.

Further, the researchers in both studies are required to establish a design and then take part in the research process.

However, translational research undertakings are monitored closely so as to answer certain biomedical issues.

Goals  

T1: Formulating treatments as well as interventions (Harrington & Hauskeller, 2014).

T2: Implementation and Dissemination of research outcomes to effect system-wide change (Ullah, 2017).

T3: Testing efficaciousness and effectiveness of the formulated interventions and treatments (Ortiz, 2015).

 

 

 

 

The qualitative studies are used to formulate a comprehension of the underlying causes as well as motivations (Boyack et al., 2014). They further reveal prevalent trends in opinions and thoughts. On the other hand, quantitative studies seek to identity data and then make a generalization of the results predicated upon a certain sample to the population that a researcher is interested in studying. Translational research addresses a certain health care policy with a view of integrating evidence-based solutions into practice. Nevertheless, traditional research seeks to examine human behavior as well as discover facts concerning a certain phenomenon in the social sphere.
Data Collection The data for the studies were obtained from clinical trials, practice-based research networks as well as population –based interventions.

 

 

 

 

 

The collection of data for qualitative studies occur through participant observation. However, when it comes to quantitative research, the same process is achieved through measuring of variables. Whereas translational research entails the implementation of research study outcomes in practice, traditional studies principally entail analyzing obtained data using multifarious statistical tools.

 

 

 

References

Boyack, K. W., Patek, M., Ungar, L. H., Yoon, P., & Klavans, R. (2014). Classification of individual articles from all of science by research level. Journal of Informetrics8(1), 1-12.

Harrington, J., & Hauskeller, C. (2014). Translational research: an imperative shaping the spaces in biomedicine. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies5(1), 191-202.

Ortiz, A. (2015). Translational nephrology: what translational research is and a bird’s-eye view on translational research in nephrology. Clinical kidney journal8(1), 14-22.

Ullah, M. H. (2017). TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH. Advances in Basic Medical Sciences (PMDC Recognized)1(1).

Re: Topic 1 DQ 1

Translational research is form of clinical research that was first seen around 1993 (Rubio et al, 2010). So as far as research goes this is a fairly new was to look into things. There is also no clear definition of translational research, but essentially it encompasses two areas of translation one being the information obtained in pre-clinical studies, lab research and the other being the adaptation of best practices in the community with their cost effectiveness (Rubio et al, 2010). There are three levels of translational research, starting with T1, which involves the beginning research or development of an intervention, including the lab research, observational research and phase I and II clinical trials (Translational Research, n.d.). The second level is T2 the translation to patients, testing these interventions and their efficacy on the patient populace, including phase III clinical trials, studying how these new interventions work with disease processes and creating new guidelines with up-to-date information (Translational Research, n.d.). The third level is T3 disseminating and implementation of all the research into daily practice, creating the research evidence found into evidence-based practices across the profession (Translational Research, n.d.).

From this information there isn’t a difference between evidence-based practice and translational research, it is just a way to get to evidence based practice. By following the ‘three T’s’, the final step is to put all of this research into practice, as evidence-based practice. For public health this means the most up to date care and information as the natural progression of translational practice ends with practice. If there is no research being done in the area however, this has a negative impact on the population, as there is not up to date EPB related to that disease process and/or its co morbidities.

Rubio, D. M., Schoenbaum, E. E., Lee, L. S., Schteingart, D. E., Marantz, P. R., Anderson, K. E., Platt, L. D., Baez, A., & Esposito, K. (2010). Defining translational research: implications for training. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges85(3), 470–475. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccd618

Translational Research – Defining the “T’s” | Translational Cancer Research Network. (n.d.). Www.Tcrn.Unsw.Edu. Retrieved June 18, 2021, from http://www.tcrn.unsw.edu.au/translational-research-definitions

 

RESPOND HERE (150 W0ORDS, 2 REFERENCES)

 

This is insightful Sarah, translational research is form of clinical research that was first seen around 1993. So as far as research goes this is a fairly new was to look into things. Translational research refers to a form of study that seeks to produce more applicable, meaningful and valid outcomes that can directly impact human health. The main objective or purpose of the translational research is to translate essential science discoveries more quickly and efficiently into practices (Eske, 2020). Translational research has been applied frequently by different researchers to enhance research processes geared towards achieving quality treatment processes and effective patient outcomes. There are three major level of translational research including T1, T2, and T3. These levels need to be incorporated into the research processes to ensure accuracy and effective outcomes in the research processes (Woolf, 2018). Level I or T1 often involves development of interventions to ensure that the entire research processes is done effectively in line with the set objectives.

References

Woolf, S. H. (2018). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. Jama299(2), 211-213. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/1149350

Topic 2 DQ 1

Description:

Explain the value of biostatistics in population health research. Describe the role of epidemiology in researching and addressing population health challenges. How are epidemiology and biostatistics significant to your evidence-based practice proposal?

Topic 2 DQ 2

Description:

Consider ecological and global issues, social determinants of health, principles of genetics, and genomics. Explain how translational research can be applied in these areas to address the burden of global disease.

Topic 2 Participation

Description:

Topic 2: Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Genetics, and Genomics

Description

Objectives:

  1. Describe the role of epidemiology in researching population health challenges.
    2. Describe the role of epidemiology in addressing population health challenges.
    3. Explain the value of biostatistics in population health research.
    4. Discuss the application of translational research to global issues.
    Study Materials

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison

Description:

Read Chapter 19 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.

Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness

Description:

Read Chapters 2 and 3 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.

Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare

Description:

Read Chapters 2 and 3 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare.

Biostatistics

Description:

Read “Biostatistics,” by Minkoff, from Magill’s Medical Guide (2018).

Population Health

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison
NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison

Description:

Genomics

Description:
Tasks

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-550 NUR-550-O503 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison 100.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 100.0%
Nursing Practice Problem (Revision) 10.0% The nursing practice problem was not included, or the required revisions were not made. The changes failed to meet the criteria for a relevant nursing practice problem for an evidence-based practice project proposal. Additional revisions are still required for approval. Revisions were made accordingly to improve the proposed nursing practice problem, but some aspects are inaccurate or unclear. Additional revisions are still required for approval. NA The nursing practice problem is clearly presented and approved. No revision was required, or all necessary revisions are were made.

Translational and Traditional Articles 15.0% More than two articles selected do not meet the assignment criteria. At least one article is omitted. Two articles do not meet the assignment criteria. It is unclear how one or two of the articles support the proposed nursing practice problem. One article does not meet the assignment criteria. Overall, the articles generally support the proposed nursing practice problem. The proposed problem would be better supported with the selection of one or two different articles. The articles meet the assignment criteria and provide adequate support for the proposed nursing practice problem. A quantitative article and a qualitative article were each compared to a translational research article. The articles are peer-reviewed, published within the last five years, and pertain to the nursing practice problem. The assignment criteria are fully met.

Comparison of Methodology Between Translational and Traditional Research 15.0% The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is omitted. The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear. The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity. The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of translational and traditional methodologies is demonstrated.

Comparison of Goals Between Translational and Traditional Research 15.0% The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted. The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear. A comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity. The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.

Comparison of Data Collection Between Translational and Traditional Research 15.0% The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted. The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear. The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity. The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.

20.0 percent observations (similarities and differences) There is no discussion of the similarities and differences between translational and quantitative research or translational and qualitative research. The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative research, as well as translational and qualitative research, are only discussed in passing. The story is hazy and contains inaccuracies. The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative research, as well as translational and qualitative research, are discussed. More details are required. There are a few minor errors. There are similarities and differences between translational and quantitative research, as well as translational and qualitative research. For clarity or accuracy, some detail is required. The parallels and differences between translational and quantitative research, as well as translational and qualitative research, are detailed and informative.

Writing Mechanics (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5% of the total Surface errors are so common that they impede meaning communication. Inappropriate wording or sentence structure is used. The reader is distracted by frequent and repetitive mechanical errors. There are inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice. The sentence structure is correct but unvarying. There are some mechanical errors or typos, but they are not distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure is used, as well as audience-appropriate language. Although there may be a few mechanical errors in the prose, they are minor. The author employs a number of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The author clearly understands standard written academic English.

Source documentation (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5% of the total The sources are not cited. Source documentation is inconsistent or incorrect, depending on the assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented in accordance with the assignment and style, though some formatting errors may occur. The sources are documented as needed for the assignment and style, and the format is mostly correct. Sources are fully and correctly documented, in accordance with the assignment and style, and the format is error-free.

Translational Research Graphic Organizer State the nursing practice problem for your evidence-based practice project. If your nursing problem has not yet been approved, make any required changes or revisions to your nursing practice problem prior to starting the assignment. Using your proposed topic, conduct a literature search and complete the tables below. Nursing Practice Problem: The problem that this project seeks to address is the incomprehensive hand-off during nurse change-overs. Roslan & Lim (2017) characterized the problem as the communication breakdown that happens during nurse-to-nurse change-overs. The problem arises because nurses use ineffective handover practices that increase the risks of miscommunication. For example, nurses practice bedside handovers whereby information is verbally shared between off-shift and incoming nurses (Fealy et al, 2018). There is also no structured procedure, framework, and/or checklist used to conduct handovers (Fealy et al, 2018). As a result, inaccurate, incomplete, and misleading information is transferred. This is a significant problem because it increases the risks of medical errors thus compromising patient safety. Comparison 1: Translational Research vs. Qualitative Research Criter ia Peer-Reviewed Translational Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Article and Permalink/Working Permalink/Working Link: Link: Fealy, G., Donelly, S., Doyle, G., Brenner, M., Patterson, A., McIntire, E., Hughes, M, Mylotte, E.,…Ziki, M. (20 …