NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Conflict and Collaboration Recent
Sample Answer for NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Conflict and Collaboration Recent Included After Question
NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Conflict and Collaboration Recent
NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Conflict and Collaboration Recent
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Conflict and Collaboration Recent
Conflict and Collaboration
Please watch the video and listen to the dialogue before posting. Second Life Video Transcript At times the needs of our families conflict with our work responsibilities. Could this possibly be the underlying issue here?
Explain the conflict resolution skills displayed by the leader in the scenario. On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate those of the leader.
How might earlier collaboration have been beneficial?
Some organizations utilize non Registered Nurses in the Case Manager role. What additional skills, knowledge and attributes would the BSN-prepared Registered Nurse bring to case management in this scenario?
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Conflict and Collaboration Recent done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Conflict and Collaboration Recent
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources:Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include:Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals:Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStormto check your writing.
Participation: RN-to-BSN
In discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
1. Attendance
Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.
2. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions
PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:
- Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
- Integrate scholarly resources
- Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates
- Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner
Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.
Participation points: It is expected that you will meet the minimum participation requirement described above. If not:
- You will receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if your response to the initial question is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
- You will also receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if you do not post at least three (3) times in each thread on at least two (2) separate days.
3. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
4. Participation Guidelines
You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline.
5. Grading Rubric
| Discussion Criteria | A (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance | B (87%) Very good or high level of performance | C (76%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance | F (0) Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week. 16 points | Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts. 16 points | Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts. 14 points | Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts. 12 points | Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s). 0 points |
| Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.* ( APA format not required) 12 points | Integrates evidence to support your discussion from:
Sources are credited.* 12 points | Integrates evidence to support discussion from:
Sources are credited.* 10 points | Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.* 9 points | Does not integrate any evidence. 0 points |
| Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week. 14 points | Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion. 14 points | Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion. 12 points | Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion. 10 points | No response post to another student or instructor. 0 points |
| Communicates in a professional manner. 8 points | Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 8 points | Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 7 points | Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 6 points | Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). 0 points |
| PARTICIPATION: Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T. | 0 points lost Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT. | -5 points Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT. | ||
| PARTICIPATION Total posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days. | 0 points lost Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days. | -5 points Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days. | ||
| NOTES: * Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required. | ||||
| ** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites. | ||||
| *** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings. | ||||
| NOTE: A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned. | ||||
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Conflict and Collaboration Recent
TITLE: NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Conflict and Collaboration Recent
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.