NR 439 Week 8 Discussion Applying and Sharing Evidence Recent

NR 439 Week 8 Discussion Applying and Sharing Evidence Recent

NR 439 Week 8 Discussion Applying and Sharing Evidence Recent

After the data have been analyzed, conclusions are made regarding what the findings mean. Then, this information must be shared with your healthcare team.

Choose one of the articles from the RRL assignment, and discuss the findings. Would you apply the evidence found to your practice? Explain your answer, please.

Translating research into practice is the final and most important step in the research process. Review information you found in your Week 3 Assignment, and explain ways in which you would share the research-based evidence with your peers.

You may begin posting in this TD on Sunday for credit

As you evaluate results reported in the articles, consider using the 4 rules that we discussed last week. It is very important to identify the purpose of the study before moving forward with the evaluation of the results. If the study has an intervention or treatment, then it is likely that there will be dependent and independent variables (Chamberlain College of Nursing, 2017). The next step focuses on identification of data collection methods and how investigators measured these variables. Furthermore, discussion and conclusion sections of the report offer an interpretation of study results and may even incorporate investigators’ opinions or speculations regarding the findings (Chamberlain College of Nursing, 2017).

Online Nursing Essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 439 Week 8 Discussion Applying and Sharing Evidence Recent done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

A well-written research report contains strengths and limitations. Concerns with study limitations are especially important when investigators report results from a pilot study. Pilot studies are often designed to preliminary test the intervention to identify potential benefits; however, as we acknowledged, results from such a study are very hard to generalize to a greater population. Pay special attention to the sample selection for the study and resources needed to implement the proposed change. Last week we discovered that even though some results appear to be statistically significant, they may not have any clinical significance. Think about other barriers or challenges you might encounter while implementing a change and how you would overcome those challenges. Thank you, Dr Joy

Reference

Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2017). NR439 Week 7: Reading research literature, credibility, and significance [Online Lesson]. Downers Grove, IL: DeVry Education Group.

  • Choose one of the articles from the Week 5 RRL assignment, and discuss the findings. Would you apply the evidence found to your practice? Explain your answer.

The week 5 RRL article I will be discussing on is quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with Frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases. A pilot study. Fall is one of the leading cause of injury morbidity and mortality in older adults. People with history of falling may limit their activities because of fear of falling. Frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease are neuro-generative dementia with a wide prevalence of fall. The purpose of the study was to identify the relationship which gait, balance, and ambulation have with falls in normal aging versus patients with AD and FTD. Identifying the patterns of gait and balance in these patients helps to put in place appropriate interventions to prevent falls in these individuals. According to the study, balance and gait problems exist in normal elderly as well as patients with AD and FTD during dual tasking indicating the role of divided attention. The study states that patients with FTD have a tendency to tilt forward, while patients with AD have a tendency to tilt backward.

These indicates the different patterns of gait and balance in patients with FTD and AD. Differentiating gait and balance in these patients will help in formulating an individualized care plan for preventing falls. Working in long term care, I encounter many patients with dementia. Often times, it is very difficult to distinguish between patients with FTD and AD. There is no distinction between the types of dementia. The two main diagnoses of dementia that is common are unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances and unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances. Before applying the evidence in my practice, it must be a multidisciplinary approach involving every member of the healthcare team. The physician must first diagnose the patient with FTD or AD, and the interdisciplinary team will determine which intervention is appropriate for the patient by applying evidence from the study.

  • Translating research into practice is the final and most important step in the research process. Review information you found your nursing clinical issue and explain ways in which you would share the research-based evidence with your peers.

Evidence based research is very important in nursing. Research and evidence based practice go hand in hand with each other. Research leads to new knowledge and nurses use research findings as evidence during their practice. I will share the research based evidence with my peers by conducting meetings and in-services. Publishing the results of the research findings in the organization’s bulletin board, newsletters, and websites. I can also use statistical analysis such as tables, graphs, and pie charts when presenting research based evidence. Our week 7 lesson states that the research process is terminated by disseminating or communicating information about the research study through publications. An example of a clinical issue is the implementation of an evidence based clinical practice guideline to reduce the number of center acquired pressure ulcers on wheelchair and bed bound patients. Using a quantitative question in the research also provide a stronger level of evidence when sharing research based evidence with my peers. Quantitative research seeks to make conclusions about the effectiveness of an intervention. They can be broken down into PICO elements (population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) for easy understanding (Houser, 2017).

References.

CCN,( 2017). NR 439 week 7 lesson: Reading research literature, credibility, and significance. Online lesson. Downers Grove, IL: Devry Education Group.

Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=sitLinks to an external site.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 439 Week 8 Discussion Applying and Sharing Evidence Recent

Where Do You Go From Here?

How has your thinking changed about nursing research and evidence based practice as the result of this course? What challenges do you anticipate you will face in implementing EBP, and how will you overcome these challenges?

APA Writing Checklist

Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.

☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.

☐The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ Topic is well defined.

☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.

☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.

☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 439 Week 8 Discussion Applying and Sharing Evidence Recent

☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.

☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.

NR 439 Week 8 Discussion Applying and Sharing Evidence Recent

Scholarly Resources:Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.

Examples of Scholarly Resources include:Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.

Peer-Reviewed Journals:Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.

Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.

Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.

☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStormto check your writing.

Participation: RN-to-BSN

In discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.

1. Attendance

Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.

2. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions

PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:

  • Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
  • Integrate scholarly resources
  • Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates
  • Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.

Participation points: It is expected that you will meet the minimum participation requirement described above. If not:

  • You will receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if your response to the initial question is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
  • You will also receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if you do not post at least three (3) times in each thread on at least two (2) separate days.

3. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

4. Participation Guidelines

You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline.

5. Grading Rubric

Discussion Criteria  A
(100%)
Outstanding or highest level of performance
B
(87%)
Very good or high level of performance
C
(76%)
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
F
(0)
Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.
16 points
Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.

16 points

Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.

14 points

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.

12 points

Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).

0 points

Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.*
( APA format not required)
12 points
Integrates evidence to support your discussion from:
  • assigned readings** OR online lessons, AND
  • at least one outside scholarly source.***

Sources are credited.*

12 points

Integrates evidence to support discussion from:
  • assigned readings OR online lesson.

Sources are credited.*

10 points

Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson.

Sources are credited.*

9 points

Does not integrate any evidence.

0 points

Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.
14 points
Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

14 points

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

12 points

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.

10 points

No response post to another student or instructor.

0 points

Communicates in a professional manner.
8 points
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

8 points

Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

7 points

Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

6 points

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

0 points

PARTICIPATION:
Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) by
Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
0 points lost

Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

-5 points

Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

PARTICIPATION
Total posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days.
0 points lost

Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.

-5 points

Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.

NOTES:
* Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required.
** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.
*** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.
NOTE: A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned.

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.