NHS 5004 Collaboration, Communication,& Case Analysis for Health Care Master’s Learners Unit 1 Assessment

NHS5004 Collaboration, Communication,& Case Analysis for Health Care
Master’s Learners.

Unit 1 Assessment

Assessment
Instructions

Preparation

Health care
leaders often find that resolving a problem in delivering safe, high-quality
health care requires the combined effort of a number of agencies, departments,
and individuals.

For this
assessment, identify a quality-related situation or problem relevant to your
professional practice or area of interest that requires the collaborative
effort of several departments and individuals to resolve. You will assume the
role of team leader and draft a proposal for the organization’s executive
leadership that outlines why this interprofessional team is necessary, who
should take part in the collaboration, how the team will function, and how
progress will be reported.

A project
proposal should identify the situation or problem, identify the causes or
contributing factors, present a plan of action, provide details about the plan,
and provide reasons why the plan should be undertaken.

Note:
Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for
feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this
assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback
if you plan on using this free service.

Proposal
Requirements

Write a
proposal for assembling an interprofessional team. As you begin drafting your
proposal, consider your goal and the needs of the leaders whose decisions will
be based on the information you provide.

Note: The
requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the
Interprofessional Collaboration scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address
each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level
descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are
provided an example proposal that illustrates what proficient-level work for
this assessment looks like.

Proposal
Format and APA Style

Use the
simplified Project Proposal Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your
proposal. You may organize the content of your proposal in a format used in
your organization. An abstract is not required.

Your
proposal should be 4–6 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title
page and reference page.

Apply
correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references.

Use Times
New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing

Be concise,
but thorough. Your readers need sufficient and accurate information on which to
base their decisions, and do not have time to sift through information that is
not pertinent.

Express
your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently.

Use correct
grammar and mechanics.

Be sure to
support your claims, arguments, and conclusions with credible evidence from 3–5
current, scholarly or professional sources.

Proofread
your writing.

Plan
Content

Analyze the
factors that have contributed to the problem. ( Hint: Examine the reasons for
ineffective communication, not just the communication itself. Reasons may
include staff burnout, workload, staffing shortfalls, attitudes, assumptions,
and so on.)

Consider
whether certain combinations of factors might be contributing to the problem.

Explain why
an interprofessional team is needed to address the problem and achieve expected
project outcomes.

Determine
who should be on the team. Identify the disciplines or areas team members
should come from and any specific job titles prospective team members should
hold.

Describe
the knowledge and expertise each discipline has to offer in resolving the
situation. In addition, consider the level of creativity and problem-solving
skills that are needed.

Assess the
effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining
interprofessional collaborative relationships. Consider how effective that
approach is in:

Encouraging
participation by all team members.

Engaging
reluctant or resistant team members.

Maintaining
a respectful platform for members to voice their ideas.

Develop a
strategy for communicating progress by the team to executive leadership.

Determine
which approach to communicating with leaders will be most effective and
efficient.

Determine
whether you will have regular meetings and generate status reports.

Develop a
collaborative plan for resolving the problem.

Identify
the ethical or political issues that are relevant factors in your proposed
solution.

Identify
the social, cultural, or economic factors that are relevant to your proposed
solution.

Explain how
you would address the ethical, political, social, cultural, or economic factors
you have identified as relevant to your plan.

Describe
your role as a leader in implementing the proposed solution.

Determine
how the practitioner-scholarmodel might be applied in resolving the problem.

Consider
how theory, research, and the published work in the field, in conjunction with
your own experience and professional knowledge, might be used to develop
strategies to analyze and resolve the problem.

Note: Your
instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your
writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing
information.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NHS 5004 Collaboration, Communication,& Case Analysis for Health Care Master’s Learners Unit 1 Assessment

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Read Also:    MSN 6030: Unit 1 Discussion DQ1 Preliminary Literature to Support Need and Population

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NHS 5004 Collaboration, Communication,& Case Analysis for Health Care Master’s Learners Unit 1 Assessment

Title: NHS 5004 Collaboration, Communication,& Case Analysis for Health Care Master’s Learners Unit 1 Assessment