DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?

Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging? assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging? depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging? is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging? assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging? Included After Question

DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?

DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?

DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2

Reflect on the material and assessment given in the course and what you have learned in this course, what aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging? Most rewarding?

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?

Title: DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?

Before I started my proposed DPI project there are a lot of ideas I have in mind that I can think of to use. I am so happy that the one I chose to do is feasible enough for my PICOT-D project. I was able to discuss my proposed DPI project first with my mentor and seek for her advice if this will be a better project that I should be concentrating and she agreed with me. At first, I wanted to concentrate on mortality rate of sepsis and septic shock and when I first placed it in my PICOT-D Dr. Etheridge suggested that it will be difficult to just concentrate with it and I agree with her feedback.Per Dr. Etheridge feedback it is important that I have correct data and I should include statistics to show. My proposed project is implementing sepsis bundle for early identification for severe sepsis and septic shock. Sepsis is a huge problem in our organization and we don’t have any protocol to follow and guide us when it comes to Sepsis. It is important to identify septic patients in ICU and optimal treatment should be performed immediately. The goal of my proposed project is better outcome and bundle compliance of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Early detection and early management in sepsis patients will improve and compliance should be included,

If my proposed DPI project is not feasible I would suggest if patient flow from ED to their respective unit will be acceptable. Delays in patient flow and a shortage of bed are common in a hospital. Improving patient flow in any organization is important for patient outcome and patient satisfaction. Crowding can negatively affect patient and staff performance and this leads to problems. Patient flow is a problem in our facility and I am a part of the patient flow committee and I see it everyday. I am very passion in making sure that patient needs to be boarded as soon as bed is available for patient comfort and for staff role as well. To improve patient flow it includes removing unnecessary testings, duplicate orders and identifying what the problem really is, I think that this will be a good project too if I will not be able to do my first proposed project.

References:

Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Phillips, G. S., Townsend, S. R., Schorr, C .A. Surviving sepsis campaign: Assocition between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5year study. Intensive Care Med. 2014; 40:1623-1633. doe: 10.1007/s00134-014-3496-0.

Rojas-Garcia, A., Turner, S., Pizzo, E., Hudson, E., Thomas, J., Raine, R.; Impact and experience of delayed pdischarge: A mixed studies systematic review; Health Expect, vol. 21, no. 1, pp41-56; 2018.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?

Title: DNP 801 Topic 8 DQ 2 What aspects of the doctoral pursuit do you find the most challenging?

Your reflection on the journey of initiating your proposed DPI project is well-captured and interesting. If your proposed DPI project is not feasible and you decide to suggest a new proposal, there are several factors to consider. First, the proposed topic should cover something you are passionate about for both project enjoyment and also averting the issues of burnout in case the project long time to complete. The proposed topic should also be relevant by striving to accomplish to meet a need or accomplish a goal (Bean & Melzer, 2021). You should perform a situation analysis by assessing possible issues related to the area chosen. The proposed topic should also be researchable. You can seek the help of a supervisor or research experts for guidance on review and how to constrict project focus. Alternatively, you can use a thorough literature review of the suggested topic to provide an in-depth understanding of how to develop or improve appropriate project knowledge and practice (Pawar & Patil, 2021). Finally, the proposed topic should make a positive impact on the nursing practice.

References

Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

Pawar, R., & Patil, S. (2021). Structured Approach to Enhance the Quality of Undergraduate Capstone Project: A Case Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(SP ICTIEE), 607-614. http://ischolar.info/index.php/JEETRIT/article/view/206232

Name:  Discussion Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

		Excellent90–100	Good80–89	Fair70–79	Poor0–69
Main Posting:Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.		40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three current credible sources.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible references.	31 (31%) – 34 (34%)Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Cited with fewer than two credible references.	0 (0%) – 30 (30%)Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible references.
Main Posting:Writing		6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Written clearly and concisely.Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Written concisely.May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Written somewhat concisely.May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Posting:Timely and full participation		9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.Posts main Discussion by due date.	8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Meets requirements for full participation.Posts main Discussion by due date.	7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Posts main Discussion by due date.	0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Does not meet requirements for full participation.Does not post main Discussion by due date.
First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.		9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.	8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.	7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.	0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
First Response:Writing		6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
First Response:Timely and full participation		5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.Posts by due date.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Meets requirements for full participation.Posts by due date.	3 (3%) – 3 (3%)Posts by due date.	0 (0%) – 2 (2%)Does not meet requirements for full participation.Does not post by due date.
Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.		9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.	8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.	7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic and may have some depth.	0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Second Response: Writing		6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response: Timely and full participation		5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.Posts by due date.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Meets requirements for full participation.Posts by due date.	3 (3%) – 3 (3%)Posts by due date.	0 (0%) – 2 (2%)Does not meet requirements for full participation.Does not post by due date.
Total Points: 100

Name:  Discussion Rubric