DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Review the “Literature Evaluation Table.”

Explain how the criteria on this table helps you evaluate the quality of a primary quantitative research article to determine if it will support a practice improvement project (DPI Project). Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why? How does the “Levels of Evidence in Research” chart support your search and the use of this table?

REPLY TO DISCUSSION

Online Nursing Essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Research is one of the efforts used to continue to promote the excellence of science and in practicing science. Some experts came together and have created guidelines for research publications, systematic reviews, and quality improvement projects. One of such groups is called Enhancing the quality and Transparency of Health Research Network (EQUATOR) (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This group provides a repository and clearing for using guidelines when reporting. It improves and maintains the reliability of any published health care research work and provides the transparency and accuracy or reporting information and encouraging a wider use of the guidelines which helps to show the strength of the evidence (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Literature review studies are very essential for any research work. It helps to present a total picture or scope of ideas of topics, methods, theories and synthesis of previous studies to increase knowledge and gives insight on how to develop studies (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018), (Loura, Bernardes, Baixinho, Henriques, Félix, & Guerreiro, 2022). Literature review helps researchers to search out relevant articles, retrieve and review them, analyze and integrate all the information from all the studies to present new information to implement in nursing knowledge and practice. Also, literature review of various studies helps with increased knowledge of effective decision making for clinical practices (Mohammadreza, Nasrullah, Najmeh, & Abdulghani, 2021). In recent times, literature reviews are regarded as a research method which follows a specific method or guidelines for conducting research that every researcher follows. It increases knowledge in any field when analyzing and critiquing materials which is different when compared to the previous traditional methods that were ad hoc, did not follow particular methods and often times were not thorough and lacked rigor and often generated questions about the validity and reliability of the research (Snyder, (2019).

There are different reasons for a literature review. One of such reasons is for the researcher to evaluate certain theories or evidence in a particular field. It can also be used to provide and overview of a research problem and identify the gaps in knowledge. It can also be used to develop theories, of building new conceptual theories or when used as a road map to research in a specific field.  (Snyder, (2019).  Therefore, researchers need to be able to critically evaluate reports to make sure the results are valid, reliable and applicable to nursing practice and hence replicable across board. Where scientific methods followed to maintain the validity of the research. This must be established before the results can be looked at. Qualitative research involves the use of statistical methods to analyze the research by determining the size of the research. Did it involve all aspects of a whole population or just some groups? The total number of sample size reported should equal the number of participants in the study to avoid attrition (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).

DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

The strength (i.e., level of evidence) and quality of an evidenced research article helps to guide research and promote its practicality and applicability for clinical practice. Hence, most research studies are based on different levels of evidence and different research designs. In addition to the levels of evidence, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2002), in Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt (2018) text, states that for any level of evidence to portray strength, it needs to show quality, quantity and consistency in research (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This will help to support my research or any research when the researcher follows the guidelines that have been established for any reputable research that will be published.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Review the "Literature Evaluation Table."
Explain how the criteria on this table helps you evaluate the quality of a primary
quantitative research article to determine if it will support a practice improvement
project (DPI Project). Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying
research article and why? How does the "Levels of Evidence in Research" chart
support your search and the use of this table

DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Unread
Replies to Nkiruka Mgbemena
Research is one of the efforts used to continue to promote the excellence of science
and in practicing science. Some experts came together and have created guidelines for
research publications, systematic reviews, and quality improvement projects. One of
such groups is called Enhancing the quality and Transparency of Health Research
Network (EQUATOR) (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This group provides a
repository and clearing for using guidelines when reporting. It improves and maintains
the reliability of any published health care research work and provides the transparency
and accuracy or reporting information and encouraging a wider use of the guidelines
which helps to show the strength of the evidence (Melnyk, & Fineout-
Overholt, 2018). Literature review studies are very essential for any research work. It
helps to present a total picture or scope of ideas of topics, methods, theories and
synthesis of previous studies to increase knowledge and gives insight on how to
develop studies (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018), (Loura, Bernardes, Baixinho,
Henriques, Félix, & Guerreiro, 2022). Literature review helps researchers to search out
relevant articles, retrieve and review them, analyze and integrate all the information
from all the studies to present new information to implement in nursing knowledge and
practice. Also, literature review of various studies helps with increased knowledge of
effective decision making for clinical practices (Mohammadreza, Nasrullah, Najmeh, &
Abdulghani, 2021). In recent times, literature reviews are regarded as a research
method which follows a specific method or guidelines for conducting research that every
researcher follows. It increases knowledge in any field when analyzing and critiquing

materials which is different when compared to the previous traditional methods that
were ad hoc, did not follow particular methods and often times were not thorough and
lacked rigor and often generated questions about the validity and reliability of the
research (Snyder, (2019).
There are different reasons for a literature review. One of such reasons is for the
researcher to evaluate certain theories or evidence in a particular field. It can also be
used to provide and overview of a research problem and identify the gaps in knowledge.
It can also be used to develop theories, of building new conceptual theories or when
used as a road map to research in a specific field.  (Snyder, (2019).  Therefore,
researchers need to be able to critically evaluate reports to make sure the results are
valid, reliable and applicable to nursing practice and hence replicable across board.
Where scientific methods followed to maintain the validity of the research. This must be
established before the results can be looked at. Qualitative research involves the use of
statistical methods to analyze the research by determining the size of the research. Did
it involve all aspects of a whole population or just some groups? The total number of
sample size reported should equal the number of participants in the study to avoid
attrition (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).
The strength (i.e., level of evidence) and quality of an evidenced research article helps
to guide research and promote its practicality and applicability for clinical practice.
Hence, most research studies are based on different levels of evidence and different
research designs. In addition to the levels of evidence, the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2002), in Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt (2018) text, states
that for any level of evidence to portray strength, it needs to show quality, quantity and
consistency in research (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This will help to support my
research or any research when the researcher follows the guidelines that have been
established for any reputable research that will be published.
References:
Loura, D. D., Bernardes, R. A., Baixinho, C. L., Henriques, H. R., Félix, I. B., &
Guerreiro, M. P. (2022). Nursing students' learning from involvement in research
projects: An integrative literature review. Revista Brasileira de
Enfermagem, 75(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0053

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing &
healthcare: A guide to best practice. LWW.
Mohammadreza, F., Nasrullah, A. Najmeh, A., & Abdulghani, A. (2021). Different types
of review studies and their role in promoting nursing knowledge: A narrative review.
Journal of Diabetic Nursing, 9(1), 1339-1355.
Loura, D. D., Bernardes, R. A., Baixinho, C. L., Henriques, H. R., Félix, I. B., &
Guerreiro, M. P. (2022). Nursing students' learning from involvement in research
projects: An integrative literature review. Revista Brasileira de
Enfermagem, 75(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0053
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and
guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-
339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.