DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why Included After Question

Review the “Literature Evaluation Table.”

Explain how the criteria on this table helps you evaluate the quality of a primary quantitative research article to determine if it will support a practice improvement project (DPI Project). Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why? How does the “Levels of Evidence in Research” chart support your search and the use of this table?

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Title: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Research is one of the efforts used to continue to promote the excellence of science and in practicing science. Some experts came together and have created guidelines for research publications, systematic reviews, and quality improvement projects. One of such groups is called Enhancing the quality and Transparency of Health Research Network (EQUATOR) (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This group provides a repository and clearing for using guidelines when reporting. It improves and maintains the reliability of any published health care research work and provides the transparency and accuracy or reporting information and encouraging a wider use of the guidelines which helps to show the strength of the evidence (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Literature review studies are very essential for any research work. It helps to present a total picture or scope of ideas of topics, methods, theories and synthesis of previous studies to increase knowledge and gives insight on how to develop studies (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018), (Loura, Bernardes, Baixinho, Henriques, Félix, & Guerreiro, 2022). Literature review helps researchers to search out relevant articles, retrieve and review them, analyze and integrate all the information from all the studies to present new information to implement in nursing knowledge and practice. Also, literature review of various studies helps with increased knowledge of effective decision making for clinical practices (Mohammadreza, Nasrullah, Najmeh, & Abdulghani, 2021). In recent times, literature reviews are regarded as a research method which follows a specific method or guidelines for conducting research that every researcher follows. It increases knowledge in any field when analyzing and critiquing materials which is different when compared to the previous traditional methods that were ad hoc, did not follow particular methods and often times were not thorough and lacked rigor and often generated questions about the validity and reliability of the research (Snyder, (2019).

There are different reasons for a literature review. One of such reasons is for the researcher to evaluate certain theories or evidence in a particular field. It can also be used to provide and overview of a research problem and identify the gaps in knowledge. It can also be used to develop theories, of building new conceptual theories or when used as a road map to research in a specific field.  (Snyder, (2019).  Therefore, researchers need to be able to critically evaluate reports to make sure the results are valid, reliable and applicable to nursing practice and hence replicable across board. Where scientific methods followed to maintain the validity of the research. This must be established before the results can be looked at. Qualitative research involves the use of statistical methods to analyze the research by determining the size of the research. Did it involve all aspects of a whole population or just some groups? The total number of sample size reported should equal the number of participants in the study to avoid attrition (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).

DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

The strength (i.e., level of evidence) and quality of an evidenced research article helps to guide research and promote its practicality and applicability for clinical practice. Hence, most research studies are based on different levels of evidence and different research designs. In addition to the levels of evidence, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2002), in Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt (2018) text, states that for any level of evidence to portray strength, it needs to show quality, quantity and consistency in research (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This will help to support my research or any research when the researcher follows the guidelines that have been established for any reputable research that will be published.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Review the "Literature Evaluation Table."
Explain how the criteria on this table helps you evaluate the quality of a primary
quantitative research article to determine if it will support a practice improvement
project (DPI Project). Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying
research article and why? How does the "Levels of Evidence in Research" chart
support your search and the use of this table

DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Title: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Research is one of the efforts used to continue to promote the excellence of science
and in practicing science. Some experts came together and have created guidelines for
research publications, systematic reviews, and quality improvement projects. One of
such groups is called Enhancing the quality and Transparency of Health Research
Network (EQUATOR) (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This group provides a
repository and clearing for using guidelines when reporting. It improves and maintains
the reliability of any published health care research work and provides the transparency
and accuracy or reporting information and encouraging a wider use of the guidelines
which helps to show the strength of the evidence (Melnyk, & Fineout-
Overholt, 2018). Literature review studies are very essential for any research work. It
helps to present a total picture or scope of ideas of topics, methods, theories and
synthesis of previous studies to increase knowledge and gives insight on how to
develop studies (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018), (Loura, Bernardes, Baixinho,
Henriques, Félix, & Guerreiro, 2022). Literature review helps researchers to search out
relevant articles, retrieve and review them, analyze and integrate all the information
from all the studies to present new information to implement in nursing knowledge and
practice. Also, literature review of various studies helps with increased knowledge of
effective decision making for clinical practices (Mohammadreza, Nasrullah, Najmeh, &
Abdulghani, 2021). In recent times, literature reviews are regarded as a research
method which follows a specific method or guidelines for conducting research that every
researcher follows. It increases knowledge in any field when analyzing and critiquing

materials which is different when compared to the previous traditional methods that
were ad hoc, did not follow particular methods and often times were not thorough and
lacked rigor and often generated questions about the validity and reliability of the
research (Snyder, (2019).
There are different reasons for a literature review. One of such reasons is for the
researcher to evaluate certain theories or evidence in a particular field. It can also be
used to provide and overview of a research problem and identify the gaps in knowledge.
It can also be used to develop theories, of building new conceptual theories or when
used as a road map to research in a specific field.  (Snyder, (2019).  Therefore,
researchers need to be able to critically evaluate reports to make sure the results are
valid, reliable and applicable to nursing practice and hence replicable across board.
Where scientific methods followed to maintain the validity of the research. This must be
established before the results can be looked at. Qualitative research involves the use of
statistical methods to analyze the research by determining the size of the research. Did
it involve all aspects of a whole population or just some groups? The total number of
sample size reported should equal the number of participants in the study to avoid
attrition (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).
The strength (i.e., level of evidence) and quality of an evidenced research article helps
to guide research and promote its practicality and applicability for clinical practice.
Hence, most research studies are based on different levels of evidence and different
research designs. In addition to the levels of evidence, the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2002), in Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt (2018) text, states
that for any level of evidence to portray strength, it needs to show quality, quantity and
consistency in research (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This will help to support my
research or any research when the researcher follows the guidelines that have been
established for any reputable research that will be published.

References:

Loura, D. D., Bernardes, R. A., Baixinho, C. L., Henriques, H. R., Félix, I. B., &
Guerreiro, M. P. (2022). Nursing students’ learning from involvement in research
projects: An integrative literature review. Revista Brasileira de
Enfermagem, 75(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0053

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing &
healthcare: A guide to best practice. LWW.
Mohammadreza, F., Nasrullah, A. Najmeh, A., & Abdulghani, A. (2021). Different types
of review studies and their role in promoting nursing knowledge: A narrative review.
Journal of Diabetic Nursing, 9(1), 1339-1355.
Loura, D. D., Bernardes, R. A., Baixinho, C. L., Henriques, H. R., Félix, I. B., &
Guerreiro, M. P. (2022). Nursing students’ learning from involvement in research
projects: An integrative literature review. Revista Brasileira de
Enfermagem, 75(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0053
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and
guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-
339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Title: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why

Scholarly research needs more than adequate time to assess, organize sources, and analyze previous literature about the research. This entails the researcher spending a great deal of time reading and summarizing other people’s work, engaging in critical thinking, assessing sources, doing some background research on the authors, and in the end looking out for biases and assess the validity and consistency of the various information/texts before using them to support his own research. (University of Washington Bothell, nd). It is essential to create a resource organizational table to use as a tool in identifying the different perspectives, thought processes, and variables that affect the question at stake (University of Washington Bothell, nd).

Therefore, it becomes imperative to complete a well-grounded literature review before developing a quality improvement project, bearing in mind the chances of biases, and focusing primarily on reducing the risks of such bias. (Watts, 2020). A great literature review requires the researcher to explore multiple databases (Bethel et al., 2021). Additionally, it is helpful to use a literature evaluation table because articles may be found on different databases but ordered and listed in a separate location. As stated earlier, the table serves as an organizational tool for easy identification of certain research trends and themes.  With a strong literature review, the study design, results, and outcomes will be valuable to the quality of the research, and even help to form the PICOT question, and at the same time provide supporting data to the PICOT intervention, thus lending viability to the research and DPI project.

References

University of Washington, Bothell. (nd) Integrating writing: assessing sources/writing a literature review. https://www.uwb.edu/wacc/resources/writing/reviews

Bethel, A. C., Rogers, M., & Abbott, R. (2021). Use of a search summary table to improve systematic review search methods, results, and efficiency. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109 (1), 97–106. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.809

Watts, K. (2020). How to conduct a literature review.  Podiatry Review, 77 (1), 14-15.