Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

Chamberlain University Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion                  

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion                  

The introduction for the Chamberlain University Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion                  

After the introduction, move into the main part of the Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion                  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion                  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion Included After Question

Sample Answer for Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion Included After Question

For those developing a quant study, what would the implication be for advanced practice if the hypothesis is accepted?

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

Title: Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

For my particular study, if the hypothesis were accepted, it would mean that prophylactic antibiotics are effective in reducing surgical site infections.  Through research and in my current practice, I have found that prophylactic antibiotics are very beneficial in reducing infections.  The implication would be that all surgical patients should be treated prophylactically before surgery with an antibiotic.  However, there are definitely some flaws in this thinking. From my research I have learned that there are many variables that could not be included in the PICOT question and variables so significant that in my opinion may question the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic use.  Some of the major variables include the type of surgery, the length of surgery, co-morbidities, wound classification, and how invasive the surgery.  Much of the surgeries that involve percutaneous “sticks” for access do not require antibiotics beforehand although many in the industry, including my own department, use them.  This type of research could be considered very useful as it is evidence based and could help to improve patient outcomes significantly (Schub & Walsh, 2017). I’m excited upon completion of this research to take to my team of physicians and PA’s to review our current practices for our patients.

Schub, E. B., & Walsh, K. C. (2017). Evidence-Based Nursing Practice: Implementing. CINAHL Nursing Guide

The difference between statistically significant results and clinical significance is very interesting. For this discussion, respond to each of the following topics.

• Distinguish between statistical and clinical significance of results.
• Would it be possible to have research study results that supported the acceptance of the null hypothesis and demonstrate clinical significance? Provide a hypothetical example that supports your answer.
• If you question the credibility of the results from a qualitative study, would the information have clinical significance for your practice area? Why or why not? Provide a hypothetical example that supports your answer.

ORDER NOW FOR INSTRUCTIONS-COMPLIANT, ORIGINAL PAPER Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

Title: Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

Statistical and clinical significance of research are both very important within the medical community and both are only productive when they bring change or influence on the patient population. According to El-Masri (2016) a statistically significant result shows the observed effect is not likely due to chance. For example, the values assigned to rule out the null hypothesis are based on pre-determined criteria. Statistical significance allows the researcher to make determinations based on the study findings and data as to the true value this research will have on the patient population. Clinical significance measures the magnitude of the relationship between the independent variable and the outcome variable (El-Masri, 2016). Clinical significance is measured by the value it brings to quality of life, patient outcomes, and cost. Healthcare professionals must be careful to ensure the results of the study are credible and they can be transferred to positively impact a patient population.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

Title:Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

Title: Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

In my opinion, I believe you can accept the null hypothesis and still demonstrate clinical significance. My understanding of clinical significance is the impact it brings to the patient population from the research data available whether the results show productive change or harmful change. “Was the treatment plan effective?” and “Does it have significance within the clinical practice?” are questions that help determine clinical significance. For example, a hypothetical research study on a group of clinically depressed patients utilizing cognitive behavior therapy as the independent variable showed no statistically significant difference between the control group and the independent group than the null hypothesis is accepted. However, the clinical results of the data showed many participants responded well to cognitive behavior therapy and verbalized improved mood, outlook, and quality of life. The researcher could look at confidence intervals to determine if cognitive behavior therapy had clinical significance on the depressed patient population and could produce change within the clinical setting such as improved quality care outcomes, patient satisfaction, or a reduction in hospital stays. Clinical significance refers to the real-life impact of research findings (El-Masri, 2016).

According to Connelly (2014) the clinical significance of a study must be determined by the clinician because they know the needs of their patient population and the practice setting in which they operate. In my opinion, if I questioned the credibility of the qualitative study I could still potentially find clinical significance in my practice area. For example, a hypothetical study on veterans’ suicide risk post deployment with in-depth interviews on a sample size of approximately 20 veterans to discuss their experience with re-integration into society and the effects on their mental health needs. The credibility of the data could be in question simply because the saturation of the data did not occur. However, as a clinician working in a rural setting with a large veteran population, I see how certain questions regarding post deployment and mental health needs could improve the quality of life and possibly reduce the suicide risk within my patient population then I have discovered clinical significance while questioning the credibility of the study.

Connelly, L.M. (2014). Statistical and clinical significance. Medsurg Nursing: Official Journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, 23(2), 118-9.

El-Masri, M. M. (2016). Statistical versus clinical significance in nursing research. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research = Revue Canadienne De Recherche en Sciences Infirmieres, 48(2), 31-32. doi:10.1177/0844562116677895

A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

Title: Statistical And Clinical Significance NR 505 Week 6 Discussion

In regards to research ethics, there has been times in history when human rights were completely violated. One time that is one of the most memorable is the Tuskegee Syphilis’s study. In this study these were racially targeted events and had severe effects on people who were not directly in the group (Alsan et al., 2019). This is known as peripheral trauma (Alsan et al., 2019). When this study was released to the public, it promoted mistrust in African American men in medicine. Whenever there is any participation of human’s subjects, sometimes there is studies that are of significant risk and sometimes they are not, this can bring about an ethical dilemma. Institutional review boards were created to review research that containing human subjects to ensure that they are protected(White, 2020) In the studies that I reviewed, I don’t believe that researchers did every single thing they could in order to protect the right of human subjects. Some measures that I would recommend is ensuring that every single participant in research can read at least an 8^th grade level to. Communication needs to be strong throughout any kind of research. If there is a specific community that is being researched making sure that rapport is being built.

Alsan, M., Wanamaker, M., & Hardeman, R. R. (2019). The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis: A Case Study in Peripheral Trauma with Implications for Health Professionals. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(1), 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05309-8Links to an external site.

White M. G. (2020). Why Human Subjects Research Protection Is Important. The Ochsner journal, 20(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.5012