PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1

Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1 assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1 depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1 is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1 assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1 Included After Question

Principalism, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the lecture and topic readings in your response.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1

Title: PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1

Ethics are very important in the healthcare field. There are four biomedical ethical principles mainly used for the framework of patient care. The common category of principles of biomedical ethics are:

. Respect for autonomy – It is a principle that requires respect for the decisions, made by an autonomous person. This means the patient has the right to choose, hold the views and take an action in the interest of their beliefs and benefits.

. Beneficence – is a principle including a sense of taking action to protect others from harm, providing health benefits against risks and cost of treatment.

. Nonmaleficence – it is a principle that includes the strategies for a person not to harm others. this principle is based on the maxim premium non-nocere, which means, “above all, do no harm” or “first of all, do no harm.”

. Justice – the characteristics of this principle based on what is due or merited according to fairness and impartially. In other words, we can say it is a distribution of benefits, risks, and costs to a general population regardless of any partiality.

It is very initial to recognize that these principles do not function as moral absolutes or laws. there are some misconceptions that individual principles should never be conceived” as trumps that allow them alone to determine a right outcome” (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013, p. viii). under the article Beauchamp and Childress The Four Principles by Douglas J. Burks. (n.d.). it is explained clearly the purpose and importance of these principles in health care enforcement. The other information regarding principles is the prima facie binding. By meaning prima facie the principles or duties must be fulfilled unless they conflict on a particular occasion with an equal or stronger principle, duty, or obligation (Ross, 2007). Prima facie is a classification of the duties that reflects our moral convictions seems actually to reveal. convections are being claimed on the bases of the nature of the knowledge. while following the rules for convections and the nature of knowledge the list of authentic conditional duties is correct as for as it goes through not necessarily complete.

In my opinion, all the principles are important in healthcare decisions, but I will support the principle of beneficence at the first rank because it is covering all the knowledge about protecting someone from harm, risks, and emotional and mental stress. nonmaleficence and justice are similar to the protection from harm and the distribution of services to provide benefits without any difference. Respect for autonomy is an important principle to protect the privacy of individuals, respect the right to choose, and respect a decision made by an individual, but protection from harm or dander comes first.

References

Douglas J. Burks. (n.d.). Beauchamp and Childress The Four Principles. Wilmington College. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/refresh/cont-ed-62/olli/22-winter/bioethics%20four%20principles.pdf

Paul J. H. (2020). Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative. Practicing Dignity an Introduction to Christian Values and Decision Making in Health Care. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/3

Ross W. D. (2007). The Right and The Good. CLARENDON PRESS • OXFORD. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/readings/ross.pdf

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1

Title: PHI 413V Week 3 Topic 3 Discussion 1

The order of principles of autonomy would start with non-Maleficence in the context of the Christian biblical narrative. The most common statement to do no harm, would be the worst concept in the view of Christianity. Special circumstances in which harming others is sometimes regarded as permissible include self-defense, punishment, consent by the person harmed, or causing someone minor harm to prevent worse harm to the same individual (DeGrazia et al.,2021). My second choice would be the moral rules associated with beneficence which include protecting and defending the rights of others, helping those with disabilities and anyone in distress or danger. The third choice of justice requires that everyone should be treated equally by others, but the principle does not specify how to determine equality or similarity. But it does not mean that one individual will always have the advantage. The principle of respect for autonomy supports several specific moral rules, including telling the truth, respecting privacy, maintaining confidentiality, assisting people in making important decisions and informed consent.

There are bioethics resource groups such as the American Scientific Affiliation (ASA) and the Canadian Scientific and Christian Affiliation (CSCA), that welcome conversation among Christians on bioethics challenges without requiring particular conclusions (Peterson, 2019).

Reference:

DeGrazia, D.,Millum, J. (2021). Chapter 4 – Nonmaleficence and Negative Constraints. Published online by Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Core.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/theory-of-bioethics/nonmaleficence-and-negative-constriants/2FBCD2DOE272CDE1D8E3AC6838BEA2OC

Peterson, J. (2019). Bioethics from a Christian Perspective. The Biologos Foundation.

https://biologos.org/articles/bioethics-from-a-christian-perspective.

Plagiarism, LopesWrite & Most Common Formatting Errors

I am posting this as these are some of the most common assignment errors and concerns for plagiarism that have occurred throughout the past years of teaching at THE UNIVERSITY.

Currently THE UNIVERSITY uses the 7th edition of the APA Publication Manual. THE UNIVERSITY has APA resources in the Student Success Center as well as resources in the THE UNIVERSITY Library.  The APA Publication Manual and the THE UNIVERSITY resources are the only supported references by the University. Purdue OWL is not a supported resource by the University. Please ensure you are submitting according to APA style when the assignment directions call for them.   A title page is required for submissions which require APA style formatting.   You may choose to follow APA guidelines for professional papers which includes a running head in anticipation for completion of your scholarly project (see formatting of title pages in Chapter 2 of the APA Manual). An Author Note is not required on the title page. Reference lists need to be double checked for accuracy prior to submission (as I will be checking links).

The following includes some of the most common mistakes:

Format: Going significantly over or under the assignment word count. Points are reduced for either going over or under this requirement, there may also be a separate section on the rubric based on the assignment for word count. Not following correct indentation of the paragraphs or headings. Writing in the first person rather than 3rd person when opinion is not required for the rubric or student has not performed the research being presented in the assignment.

Spelling: points are reduced for distracting mistakes

Supporting details: not including citations to support information/writing of a section. If the rubric states area needs supporting details, students are not including citations to support the details of their writing.

APA/References: This is the area most of point reductions occur:

Currently THE UNIVERSITY uses the 7th edition of the APA Publication Manual. THE UNIVERSITY has APA resources in the Student Success Center as well as resources in the THE UNIVERSITY Library. The APA Publication Manual and the THE UNIVERSITY resources are the only supported references by the University, Purdue OWL is not a supported resource by the University. Please ensure you are submitting according to APA style when the assignment directions call for them.

1. Running Head: if you follow professional paper guidelines, ensure this is according to APA style. There are specifics regarding capitalization as well as number of characters allowed. (Section 2.8 & 2.18, APA, 2020).

2. Title/Cover page: Ensure the required elements are present, these requirements have changed since the 6th edition. In placing a professor’s/faculty member’s name on the title page, ensure you have provided the accurate information (e.g., Dr. or Professor), (Section 2.3, APA, 2020). An Author Note is not required on the title page.

3. Body of the text: this is the area most struggle on.

• A sample of a professional paper can be found starting on page 50 (APA, 2020)
• General writing rules of the English Language are to have at minimum 3 sentences in a paragraph. This writing rule will be used for grading of rubrics.
• APA writing is typically in the third person; me, myself, I, we and/or us, is all first person and should be used only where personal opinion is required per rubric.
• Abbreviation guidelines can be found in sections 6.24-6.31 (APA, 2020)
• Formatting of in-text citations (Sections 8.10-8.22, APA, 2020).
• Principles of paraphrasing (Section 8.23 & 8.24, APA, 2020).
• Students appear to be concerned about missing a citation. It is not APA format to cite the same author multiple times in a paragraph unless one of two things. 1. there is a new citation between or 2. if there is generalized information and then a direct quote – A sample of writing can be found in the Manual (Section 8.16, APA, 2020).
• Direct quotes need a page number, paragraph number, or section of original work. Principles of quotations can be found in the Manual (Sections 8.25-8.29, APA, 2020).
• Font, spacing and indentation are not consistent (Sections 2.19, 2.21 & 2.24 APA, 2020).
• It is not needed to restate the journal article titles or journal title in the body of the text as the citation will lead the reader to this information.
• Each and every piece of intellectual knowledge, which is not your own personal research, needs to be cited. If it is your personal observation, wording must be in the third person such as “this researcher has observed….” or something along that nature. If you are using someone’s intellectual property word for word without correct APA formatting, this is considered plagiarism – whether or not you have used a citation in the paragraph.   The Manual discusses plagiarism and self-plagiarism (Sections 8.2 & 8.3, APA, 2020).

4. Reference page most common concerns.

• Chapter 9 in the Manual is regarding the Reference List and Chapter 10 in the Manual is regarding Reference Examples (APA, 2020).
• Reference page is not on a new page, flush to top.
• Order of required elements is not correct.
• Not all required elements are found in the reference.
• Authors and year are not formatted according to APA.
• Capitalization in journal article titles are not according to APA.
• Formatting and capitalization of journal titles are not according to APA.
• Order of the references is not according to APA.
• Wikipedia references and the like are not considered scholarly work and will not be accepted as appropriate reference.
• All references in course are required to have a date and be within the past 5 years unless it is a primary sources such as the original theory written. The Manual discussed primary vs secondary sources (Section 8.6, APA, 2020).

I strongly encourage obtaining a copy of the APA manual, it will help you in your graduate studies going forward with appropriate references as per the Manual.