NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement

Walden University NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement                       

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement Included After Question

NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement

 Post a brief explanation of how you would identify a quality improvement practice gap in your practice or organization. Describe a potential quality improvement practice gap you might use for your DNP project, and explain why. Then, explain at least two types of tools and/or methods you might use to address this quality improvement practice gap, and explain why. Be specific and provide examples. 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement

Title: NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement

How to Identify a Practice Gap

            Quality improvement gaps are identified in the author’s organization by events, monthly and quarterly matrix, and adverse events that might occur that lead to a root-cause analysis (RCA). Leadership is made aware of the quality improvement gaps chair of the committees who present the monthly or quarterly findings to leadership. A gap in practice is a discrepancy between wanted outcomes and the obtained outcomes. A gap in practice is an opportunity to make changes to improve. One of the quality improvement gaps that currently impact healthcare is compassion fatigue (CF) and burnout (BO).

Quality Improvement Practice Gap

            In a demanding, complex work environment, compassion fatigue (CF) and burnout (BO) are familiar among healthcare professionals. Compassion, as defined by Dinc and Ekinci (2019) as “A deep awareness of someone’s suffering and acting or feeling of motivated to help” (p.193).  Caring is synonymous with nursing. As a well-known pioneer in nursing, Florence Nightingale provided care to patients in a compassionate, caring manner (Charlie, 2020). According to Dinc and Ekinci (2019), compassion is an individual’s attitude, attentiveness, and sensitivity. In contrast, compassion fatigue (CF) is defined as the lack of caring due to emotional and physical exhaustion, stress, and uncertainty (Dinc&Ekinci, 2019).  During the author’s frontline experience, she was able to identify these gaps in practice.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NURS 8302 Discussion Identifying Practice Gaps for Quality Improvement:

Healthcare professionals such as nurses seek to care for others while lacking self-care. Nurses in healthcare are at high risk for CF, as they are frequently exposed to traumatic, emotional, and stressful events. Nurses are overwhelmed, emotionally and physically exhausted, and fearful of lack of supplies, lack of staff, and lack self-care and enjoyment of their purpose; unfortunately,  CF leads to healthcare professionals leaving their profession(Fukumori et al., 2020; Watts & Thorne-Odem, 2020). It is essential to identify the causation and mitigate the issues, reduce staff resignations, and improve retention, patient and staff satisfaction, outcomes.  The author performed a literature review to help define and develop the proposed research question: “Is there evidence that suggests education intervention towards compassion fatigue compared to no education, increases knowledge and awareness of compassion fatigue amongst healthcare professionals?”

Two Types of Tools/Methods to Address the Quality Improvement Gap

            The two types of tools/methods the author will use to address the quality improvement gap are Lean Six Sigma and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA). Lean Six Sigma is a hybrid of two methodologies the work together well (Catalyst, 2018; Sipes, 2020). This hybrid method finds ways to remove the waste while improving processes to maintain consistency. Lean Six Sigma works well together to enhance the quality of care and improve outcomes. They are different in their methods but work well together. Six Sigma is metric-driven, while lean focuses on eliminating waste. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) is another tool to address the issue of a quality improvement practice gap. The PDSA four phases work together to improve quality, patient safety, care, and patient satisfaction, which focuses on translating ideas into actions to improve processes (Slootmans, 2018).  By utilizing these methods, the author will address the practice gap, improve patient outcomes, and enhance communication while making changes using evidence-best practice and mentoring.

References

Catalyst, N. (2018). “What is lean healthcare?” NEJM Catalyst. http://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10/1056/CAT.18.0193

Dinc, S., &Ekinci, M. (2019). Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability of compassion fatigue short scale. PsikiyatrideGuncelYaklasimlar, 11, 192-202

Fukumori, T., Miyazaki, A., Takaba, C., Taniguchi, S., &Asai, M. (2020). Traumatic events among cancer patients that lead to compassion fatigue in nurses: A qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manage, 59(2), 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.026

Slootmans, S. (2018). Project Management and PDSA-Based Projects (pp. 175–198). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71042-6_8 Watts, S. A., & Thorne-Odem, S. (2020). Nursing yourself away from burnout and compassion fatigue to resilience and joy at work. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy!, 18(6), 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NME.0000717684.70292.43

This is an outstanding work Andretta. The methodologies of identifying quality improvement gap in health care organization have been clearly identified. I concur with your post. Ideally, identification of quality improvement gap should be followed by addressing the gap and determination of quality of the service. However, evaluating the perceptions and expectations of patients concerning health care delivery and areas that need improvement remains a great challenge (Javed & Ilyas, 2018). Usually, surveys have been used to understand quality improvement gaps from the perspective of the patients and other stakeholders. However, another important methodology that organizations and providers can use is to compare the perceived and the expected quality of service and identify the gaps between them, utilize the feedback from the stakeholders to enhance quality, and evaluate the real experiences of health care (Lu et al., 2020). As service quality is increasingly becoming a critical aspect of corporate strategy in health care system, an approach of measuring the perception and understanding the gap between perception and expectation can be important in quality improvement initiatives (Dopeykar et al., 2018).

References

Dopeykar, N., Bahadori, M., Mehdizadeh, P., Ravangard, R., Salesi, M., & Hosseini, S. M. (2018). Assessing the quality of dental services using SERVQUAL model. Dental Research Journal, 15(6), 430. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243813/

Javed, S. A., & Ilyas, F. (2018). Service quality and satisfaction in healthcare sector of Pakistan—the patients’ expectations. International journal of health care quality assurance. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2016-0110

Lu, S. J., Kao, H. O., Chang, B. L., Gong, S. I., Liu, S. M., Ku, S. C., & Jerng, J. S. (2020). Identification of quality gaps in healthcare services using the SERVQUAL instrument and importance-performance analysis in medical intensive care: a prospective study at a medical center in Taiwan. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05764-8