NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
![NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]](https://onlinenursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-11.png)
Walden University NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment] assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment] depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment] is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment] done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How to Write the Body for NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment] assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment] assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
The provision of quality healthcare is the aim of the American government. Achieving this objective entails a consideration of a number of issues. One of them is increasing the number of people who are covered by the medical insurance schemes. The other one is increasing the affordability, availability, and accessibility of high quality care. There is also a need to improve the cost efficiency of healthcare services.
Accordingly, the best available care should be provided with a focus on the optimization of the healthcare resources. In a bid to achieve these objectives, the Affordable Care Act was adopted in the US in 2010. The policy has been effective in delivering the objectives. The success can be seen from evidences such as increased insurance coverage for citizens, expanded accessibility of care, and reduction in costs of healthcare over time in the state (Morrison & Furlong, 2019).
Despite these improvements, there have been policy recommendations to either repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act. Consequently, there is an increased need for the investigation of the effects, politics, and options associated with this policy. Therefore, this research paper explores the proposed policy to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act. It explores aspects that include the definition of the policy issue, application of policy analysis framework, policy options, and building consensus on it.
Definition of Policy
The Affordable Care Act is perceived as one of the policies that have significantly shaped the healthcare system in America. The policy has expanded alongside improved insurance coverage in the U.S. in two mechanisms. Firstly, it has expanded the total number of citizens covered by the medical insurance. This has been achieved using Medicaid expansion and the provision of cost subsidies to those purchasing private insurance exchanges.
The second way entails the fact that the policy has upgraded the scope of the coverage through its enhancement of benefit design (Willison & Singer, 2017). Despite these benefits, there have been policy initiatives aiming at the repeal or replacement of the Affordable Care Act. The first attempt to repeal the policy was between 2011 and 2012 where the Republicans and Democrats voted for the repealing of the Job-Killing Health Care Law act.
However, the Democrats voted it down in the house of Senate, thereby, prompting Obama not to adopt the policy recommendations. The proposal was also unsuccessful despite the pressure from President Trump (Béland, Rocco & Waddan, 2016). Therefore, repealing or replacing the affordable Care act remains a hotly debated policy initiative for the Americans in the modern era.
The Effect of the Policy on the Policy Arena
The proposed policy on whether the Affordable Care Act should be repealed or replaced has significant effect on the policy arena. One of the health policy stakeholders that have been keen on the proposed policy is the American Association of Family Practitioners. According to a statement from the organization, it does not support the proposal since it violates the fundamental right to access to quality healthcare by the citizens.
According to them, their organization strongly advocates patient access to primary medical care and healthcare coverage. It also strives to ensure that the high costs of healthcare are managed to increase the access of patients to their needed care (AAFP, n.d.). Therefore, they anticipate that repeal or replacement of the Affordable Care Act will worsen the existing disparities in access to healthcare.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]:
The American Nurses Association has also provided their insights into the proposed policy. According to association, the Affordable Care Act should not be replaced or repealed. As cited in their response, the proposal would affect adversely the universal access to care by the citizens through high costs of healthcare (ANA, 2017).
It will also hinder the optimization of the primary as well as community-based interventions that are utilized to promote health care access with cost-efficient innovative and value driven models of care.
It can be seen from the responses from the above organizations that the proposal to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act has significant effects on the policy arena. Firstly, it increases the need for the exploration of alternative and sustainable models of improving access, coverage, and cost of healthcare in the US.
Secondly, it raises the need for the policy makers to explore the ways in which the current provisions of the Affordable Care Act can be improved to achieve its goals. Lastly, it increases the relevance on the need for active stakeholder engagement in the exploration of the need to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act.
Current Politics of the Issue
Currently, the status of the proposed policy to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act is uncertain. The uncertainty arises from three main challenges that face its implementation. They include the issues that must be addressed in the regulatory implementation of the essential health benefits, barriers facing small group markets and individuals in most of the insurance exchanges, and the push for selling health insurance by the Trump administration across states.
Generally, the Republicans support the initiatives that aim at repealing or replacing the Affordable Care Act. Their support can be seen from 2011-2012 where their proposal to repeal the Job-Killing Healthcare Law. In 2013-2014, they proposed an act that aimed at repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. However, it was unsuccessful.
However, the Democrats have constantly opposed the move by the Republicans. According to the Democrats, repealing or replacing the act will result in significant adverse outcomes. One of them entails increasing the cost of care to the low-income earners in the country. They also argue that it will result in the potential collapse of the health insurance market in the U.S. Lastly, the proposal will lead to the elimination of the protections provided to the vulnerable in the country such as the mentally ill and elderly (Aron-Dine & Broaddus, 2018).
Health organizations such as the American Nurses association and American Association of Family Practitioners have supported the bases of opposition by the Democrats. Consequently, it remains evident that replacing or repealing the act is only possible if sustainable, practical, and all-inclusive plan is introduced in the state.
Level of the Policy in the Policy Making Process
The establishment of a policy in any state undergoes several steps. They include policy building, formulation, adoption, policy implementation, evaluation of its effectiveness, and termination. The proposed policy to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act has passed the building phase and is now at the formulation and adoption stage. The policy formulation and adoption stage is characterized by the policy makers coming up with an approach that can be utilized to solve a problem.
There is active involvement of different stakeholders that include the executive branch of the government, interest groups, and the courts. Often, parties are invited to provide their views concerning the proposal. There is also the involvement of the president in the process. The Congress and the Senate are required to vote as a way of determining whether it should be adopted or not.
The majority of the voters in both houses win and the proposal is either rejected or embraced. The proposal to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act is at this stage. Different stakeholders have been invited to provide their views concerning it. The Senate and Congress have also voted to express their views on the issue. The president is also involved in determining the effectiveness and appropriateness of the policy.
Policy Analysis Framework
The framework for policy analysis by Morestin (2012) will be used in this research. According to the framework, policy analysis is done with a consideration of dimensions that include effects and implementation. The analysis of the effects of the policy focuses on aspects that include effectiveness, unintended effects, and equity. On the other hand, implementation focuses on aspects that include the cost, feasibility, and acceptability of the policy. Therefore, the aspects are evaluated in considering the policy in terms of social, ethical, legal, historical, and financial contexts.
Social
The adoption of any policy should promote social good. In relation to the model, the social effectiveness, unintended effects, equity, cost, feasibility, and acceptability of the proposed policy should be explored. The effectiveness of the policy mainly focuses on its effects on the health issue being explored. Repealing or replacing the Affordable Care Act is likely to increase the social costs of health.
It will widen the existing inequalities in healthcare due to social determinants of health. It is also likely to increase the misrepresentation of the minority groups such as people of color in healthcare (Béland et al., 2016). Therefore, it is anticipated that the technical feasibility of the proposed policy is low due to it being socially unacceptable.
Ethical
Ethics mainly focuses on ensuring that one does what is considered socially and morally right. It encompasses the consideration of ethical principles such as justice, veracity, non-beneficence and maleficence, and informed consent. The proposed policy changes will promote a reduction in the spending of the state agencies on health.
However, there are unintended consequences associated with the decision such as increase in the costs of healthcare, widening of disparities in healthcare, and limiting the availability, access, and affordability of primary care (Morrison & Furlong, 2019). The cost, feasibility, acceptability, and equity impacts of the proposal imply that it will be violating the fundamental rights of the American citizens to affordable, available, accessible, and quality healthcare.
Historical
The historical facet of the policy analysis explores the developments that have influenced the need for policy change. As shown earlier, the adoption of the Affordable Care Act has resulted in significant benefits that include increase in the populations covered by the medical insurance and elimination of barriers to healthcare. The policy has however experienced some challenges.
They include the rising costs of healthcare incurred by the state despite the projections of reducing them with its use. Scholars are also concerned that the policy will not have the desired sustainability in the long-term. As a result, there is a need for either repealing or replacing the act. According to the framework by Morestin (2012), the weaknesses identified in the current policy should be considered in exploring the possibilities of policy changes in the future.
Financial Context
The financial context of policy analysis focuses on the cost efficiency and effectiveness of a policy. There is a need to focus on whether the policy has positive socioeconomic and political impacts. The earlier analysis has revealed that the proposed policy changes will increase the social costs of healthcare.
There is anticipated rise in the spending incurred by the citizens in seeking the care they need. The financial feasibility and acceptance of the policy are also low (Glassman, 2017). Therefore, there is a need to consider these financial implications when embracing the policy.
Theoretical Underpinnings of the Proposed Policy
There exist theoretical underpinnings for the repealing or replacing the Affordable Care Act. One of them is the assertion that the act is increasing the cost incurred in healthcare rather than reducing it. For instance, it is projected that the cost of healthcare spending is expected to increase more than $1.8 trillion in the next decade (Senger, 2015). The act also has limiting payment reductions in its long-term projections.
For instance, cutting the Medicare benefits by up to $700 billion by 2022 will affect adversely the ability of the elderly to access the care they need. There is also the assertion that the current policy has reduced the significance of the private insurance schemes. The introduction of benefit mandates in the new coverage schemes have led to health insurance cancellations for individuals who were privately insured.
Lastly, the policy has not met its exchange enrollment targets. The policy was expected to cause a significant rise in the original projections in the enrollment rate to the medical insurance cover. However, this has not been the case since the enrollment has been below the projected targets (Senger, 2017). Therefore, it raises the concerns on the long-term sustainability of the policy in the state.
The stakeholders of interest that have been actively involved in exploring the proposed policy change include the healthcare providers, health organizations, politicians, government, and non-governmental organizations. As shown earlier, the American Nurses Association has given its statement concerning the proposed policy change. Accordingly, it argues that the proposed policy changes limit equity in access to healthcare by increasing the costs of healthcare (ANA, 2017).
Policy Solutions
Three policy solutions can be embraced in relation to either repealing or replacing the Affordable Care Act. The first approach is not embracing any change on the current policy. This policy option assumes that the current state of the act should not be altered. It also assumes that the policy is effective in delivering its objectives.
It therefore implies that there should be minimal advocacy efforts and leadership requirements in implementing the needed change. The focus should be on maintaining the existing state. The need for inter-professional collaboration is minimal since the stakeholders are satisfied with the policy.
The benefits associated with this solution include minimal costs incurred in policy change, maintenance of status quo, and increased possibilities for the projected objectives of the policy being achieved (Glassman, 2017). However, it is associated with disadvantages that include the increased risk for continued rise in costs of healthcare, uncertainty in the future of the policy, and minimal or lack of inter-professional collaboration in analyzing the effectiveness of the policy.
The second option that can be considered is taking partial change. Here, some sections of the act can be repealed. A focus should be placed on improving the areas of the act that are prone to weaknesses and can undermine the sustenance of the policy. The assumptions in this decision are that some weaknesses exist in the policy that can affect its effectiveness.
It also assumes that some components of the policy are likely to threaten the realization of the long-term goals of the policy. Therefore, there is a need for the adoption of transformative leadership approaches in implementing this decision. The focus should be on ensuring active stakeholder participation in the policy analysis.
There is also a need for active inter-professional collaboration to ensure that the different views are taken into consideration in the policy making process. The benefit of this option is that the current policy will be strengthened by the elimination of its evident areas of weakness.
It also empowers different professionals due to their active participation. However, the option is associated with the disadvantage of high costs and too much time needed for dialogue (Cohen et al., 2015). Despite these weaknesses, this option remains the most feasible intervention that can be used to improve the Affordable Care Act.
The last level of policy solution that can be embraced is radical change. The most effective option in this case would be replacing the Affordable Care Act with a new policy. The assumption in this option is that the act is ineffective. There exist alternative pathways that can be explored to increase health-related metrics in the US.
The decision also assumes that the act is not sustainable in the long-term. This option requires significant advocacy interventions from the different stakeholders affected by it. There should be active stakeholder engagement to ensure that the new policy incorporates their diverse views. The leadership should also focus on ensuring sustainability of the new policy. It should be cost effective and practical in solving the issues in the current policy.
This decision is associated with the benefit of possibly transforming healthcare positively by introducing new policies. However, it is expensive and requires more time for inter-professional collaboration. The decision also fails to improve on the weaknesses of the current policy.
Therefore, rather than solving the uncertainty in some provisions, it is transferred to the new act (Cohen et al., 2015). This policy option is the least feasible among the three since radical policy change are difficult to be implemented in use.
Building Consensus
My recommended solution is the adoption of partial change. It is true that despite the affordable Care act being effective; it has some weaknesses that threaten its sustenance. The weaknesses can only be solved by repealing some of the sections and not replacing the act or taking no action. It is therefore recommended that two interventions that include use of open channels of communication and active stakeholder participation be utilized to build consensus.
There should be open communication on the changes that should be made on the policy. The different views should be incorporated into the process of changing the current policy. There should also be active stakeholder engagement. The different stakeholders should be involved in exploring the most effective options that can be adopted to improve the policy. Active stakeholder participation will also promote their empowerment and ownership of the policy alongside the sustainability of the policy provisions.
Conclusion
In sum, the Affordable Care Act has brought significant transformations to the US healthcare system. Similar to other policies, it is prone to some weaknesses that might threaten its effectiveness. As a result, a focus should be placed on improving its areas of weaknesses rather than replacing it. The whole process can be a success if active stakeholder engagement and open communication systems are embraced.
References
AAFP. (n.d.). aCa Repeal/Replace. Retrieved on 9th Feb. 2020 from https://www.aafp.org/media-center/kits/aca-repeal-replace.html
ANA. (2017). ANA Principles and Policy Priorities for Affordable Care Act, Replacement or Repair. Retrieved on 9th Feb. 2020 from https://www.nursingworld.org/~4afd6b/globalassets/practiceandpolicy/health-policy/repair-repeal-positions-comments_2017mar.pdf
Aron-Dine, A. & Broaddus, M. (2018). Latest Republican ACA repeal plan would have similar harmful impacts on coverage and health as all the others. Retrieved on 9th Feb. 2020 from https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/latest-republican-aca-repeal-plan-would-have-similar-harmful-impacts-on-coverage-and
Béland, D., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2016). Obamacare wars: Federalism, state politics, and the Affordable Care Act. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Cohen, A. B., Colby, D. C., Wailoo, K., & Zelizer, J. E. (2015). Medicare and Medicaid at 50: America’s entitlement programs in the age of affordable care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glassman, A. (2017). What’s In. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Morestin, F. (2012). A framework for analyzing public policies: Practical guide. Centre de collaboration nationale sur les politiques publiques et la santé, Institut national de santé publique Québec.
Morrison, E. E., & In Furlong, E. (2019). Health care ethics: Critical issues for the 21st century. Burlington, Massachusetts, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Senger, A. (2017). 8 Reasons why Obamacare should be repealed. Retrieved on 9th Feb. 2020 from https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/8-reasons-why-obamacare-should-be-repealed
Senger, A. (2015). Five reasons to repeal Obamacare. Retrieved on 9th Feb. 2020 from https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/five-reasons-repeal-obamacare
Willison, C. E., & Singer, P. M. (2017). Repealing the affordable care act essential health benefits: Threats and obstacles. American journal of public health, 107(8), 1225.
The Effect of the Policy on the Policy Arena
The proposed policy on whether the Affordable Care Act should be repealed or replaced has significant effect on the policy arena. One of the health policy stakeholders that have been keen on the proposed policy is the American Association of Family Practitioners. According to a statement from the organization, it does not support the proposal since it violates the fundamental right to access to quality healthcare by the citizens.
According to them, their organization strongly advocates patient access to primary medical care and healthcare coverage. It also strives to ensure that the high costs of healthcare are managed to increase the access of patients to their needed care (AAFP, n.d.). Therefore, they anticipate that repeal or replacement of the Affordable Care Act will worsen the existing disparities in access to healthcare.
The American Nurses Association has also provided their insights into the proposed policy. According to association, the Affordable Care Act should not be replaced or repealed. As cited in their response, the proposal would affect adversely the universal access to care by the citizens through high costs of healthcare (ANA, 2017). It will also hinder the optimization of the primary as well as community-based interventions that are utilized to promote health care access with cost-efficient innovative and value driven models of care.
It can be seen from the responses from the above organizations that the proposal to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act has significant effects on the policy arena. Firstly, it increases the need for the exploration of alternative and sustainable models of improving access, coverage, and cost of healthcare in the US.
Secondly, it raises the need for the policy makers to explore the ways in which the current provisions of the Affordable Care Act can be improved to achieve its goals. Lastly, it increases the relevance on the need for active stakeholder engagement in the exploration of the need to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act.
NURS 8100 Assignment 3 Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
In previous Discussions and Assignments, you examined various aspects of the policy process, such as policy unintended consequences, agenda setting, and policy recommendation analysis. You will have the opportunity to further develop your analysis skills in this Assignment by working through the policy analysis process. To be an effective agent of social change, you must be able to analyze policy logically and critically from multiple perspectives and contexts, and then present your findings in a concise and professional manner. This exercise will provide such an opportunity.
For this Assignment, you will examine a specific policy of interest to you (perhaps the one you chose for this week’s Discussion) and use a policy analysis framework to understand the impact of the policy’s implementation. You will then write a policy analysis paper, which is due on the fifth day of Week 11. This paper will also serve as your course’s Major Assessment.
To prepare:
Select a health care policy and a policy analysis framework to utilize for this Assignment. You may use the policy and framework you identified in this week’s Discussion or change your selection.
To complete:
Write an 8- to 10-page analysis paper (including references) in which you succinctly address the following:
- Part 1: Define the policy issue.
- How is the issue affecting the policy arena?
- What are the current politics of the issue?
- At what level in the policy making process is the issue?
- Part 2: Apply a policy analysis framework to explore the issue using the following contexts:
- Social
- Ethical
- Legal
- Historical
- Financial/economic
- Theoretical underpinnings of the policy
- Include in this section:
- Who are the stakeholders of interest?
- Is there a nursing policy/position statement on this health care issue? If so, who developed it?
- Part 3: Policy options/solutions
- What are the policy options/solutions for addressing the issue? Include at least three levels of options/solutions: no change; partial change; radical change or maximum change.
- What are the theoretical underpinnings of the policy options/solutions?
- What are the health advocacy aspects and leadership requirements of each option?
- How does each option/solution provide an opportunity or need for inter-professional collaboration?
- What are the pros and cons of each suggested change? Include the cost benefits, effectiveness, and efficiency of each option along with the utility and feasibility of each option.
- Part 4: Building Consensus
- Outline a plan for building consensus around your recommended option/solution for solving the policy issue.
- Part 5: References
- Limit your references so this section is no more than 2 pages.
Your written assignments must adhere to APA standards. Make sure to cite specific citations from appropriate Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as needed. To ensure that your in-text citations and reference list are correct, consult the American Psychological Association’s Publication Manual.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8100 Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper [Major Assessment]
By Day 7 of Week 11
This Assignment is due.
Continue to work on this Assignment, assigned in Week 4. You will need to incorporate any related topics addressed this week. Your policy analysis paper is due by Day 7 of this week.
By Day 7
Submit this Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please store your assignment with the extension “WK11Assgn3+last name+first initial. (extension).”
By clicking the Week 11 Assignment 3 Rubric, you may review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Go to the link for Week 11 Assignment 3. You can use “View Rubric” to see the grading criteria for this area.
Then, in the Attach File section, select Browse My Computer from the drop-down menu. Open the file named “WK11Assgn3+last name+first initial. (extension)” that you saved.
If applicable, in the Plagiarism Tools section, click the box next to I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 11 Assignment 3 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 11 Assignment 3 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To submit your Assignment:
Week 11 Assignment 3
Also Read: NURS 8100 Wk 11 Discussion: Nursing and Health Policy in Other Nations
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource
Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Paper
Program LOs: 4, 5
4: Professions/Collaborators
5: Effective Communicators
DNP Essentials: 5, 6
5: Healthcare Policy for Advocacy in Healthcare
6: Interprofessional collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health Outcomes
The policy I addressed was the Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act of 2019. This policy/bill expands and empowers nursing workforce development programs through FY2024 (Congress, n.d.). This bill builds on the Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2010) report that recommends nurses should achieve higher levels of education and training through an improved education system that promotes seamless academic progress. This policy/bill was first passed in 2017 and has required significant nursing leadership advocation. I utilized a framework by Fawcette and Russell (2001) to look at social, ethical, legal, and financial impacts of the policy.
Numerous options/solutions for addressing the policy were addressed including no change, partial change, and a radical change. A partial solution to the barrier of nursing education funding would be the proposal of the Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act. This could encourage the standardization of nursing programs and create one uniform degree requirement for entry level nursing. Nurses could also access clear instructions on how to advance their degree with various clinical pathways outlined. This solution requires nursing leaders to be a strong advocate both in policy reform and nursing organizations to fill the gap until a more radical solution could be proposed.
This can positively impact the nursing practice as it increases nurse education dollars and could improve staff to patient radios for improved patient outcomes. A radical change to address the nursing education pipeline would be providing free four-year education at a public university. This would take significant funding from taxpayers and bipartisan support. This radical solution would require nursing leaders to be highly involved in nursing legislature to ensure the solution was implemented. The cost of this radical option could be exorbitant and would require significant dedication, consensus, and support to obtain. The impact to the nursing profession as a result of this solution is unknown but one can posit that it would increase the number of healthcare professionals entering the field, improve staffing ratios and ultimately positively impact patient and organizational outcomes.
References
Congress. (n.d.). H.R. 728 Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act of 2019. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/728
Fawcette, J., & Russell, G. (2001). A conceptual model of nursing and health policy. Policy, Politics, & Nursing, 2(2), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/152715440100200205
Institute of Medicine (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health.
(Scroll down for table)
| ASSIGNMENT PROMPT | Target
5 points |
Acceptable
3 points |
Unacceptable
1 point |
Score/Level |
|
Policy analysis paper
Part 1: Definition of policy issue
Program LO: 4, 5
DNP Essential: 5, 6 |
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; how the issue affects the policy arena; current politics of the issue; level in the policy making process using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5. Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6. |
Well-developed good quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It fully meets expectations for graduate level work. Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5. Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6. |
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work. Insufficient to meet expectations for LOs 4, 5. Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 5, 6. |
|
| Part 2: Application of a policy analysis framework
Program LO: 4, 5
DNP Essential: 5, 6. |
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; social, ethical, legal, historical, economic, and theoretical contexts explored; stakeholders and position statements discussed using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5. Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6. |
Well-developed good quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses about 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It meets expectations for graduate level work. Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5. Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6. |
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work. Insufficient to meet expectations for LOs 4, 5. Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 5, 6. |
|
| Part 3: Presentation of policy options and/or solutions
Program LOs: 4, 5. DNP Essential: 5, 6. |
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; discussion of 3 policy options, including theoretical, advocacy and collaborative elements; pros and cons of each using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5. Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6. |
Well-developed good quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses about 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It meets expectations for graduate level work. Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5. Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6. |
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work. Insufficient to meet expectations for LOs 4, 5. Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 5, 6. |
|
| Part 4: Plan for building consensus
Program LOs: 4, 5. DNP Essential: 5, 6. |
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; discussion of 3 policy options, including and includes strategies for how to persuade others and / or build consensus using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review; instead, demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. Fully meets expectations for LOs 4 and 5. Fully meets expectations for Essentials 5 and 6. |
Well-developed good quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses about 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstration of content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. It meets expectations for graduate level work. Meets expectations for LOs 4, 5. Meets expectations for Essentials 5, 6. |
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work. Insufficient to meet expectations for LOs 4, 5. Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 5, 6. |
|
| Part 5: References and page requirements | The majority of references are from scholarly journals, supports the topic well, and are current. Paper stays within page requirements. APA format used correctly throughout.
Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work. |
Most references are from scholarly journals and support the topic. Most references are fairly current. The paper stays within requirements. APA format used with minimal errors.
Meets expectations for graduate level work. |
References are not sufficient or are mostly from the lay literature or out of date. The paper is either too long or too short. Weak writing quality and/or little evidence of correctness of APA format.
Work lags behind expectations for graduate level work. |
|
| Grammar and APA formatting | Up to 5 points (20%) may be deducted for errors in grammar and/or APA style. | |||
Assignment:
Write an 8–10-page analysis paper (including references) in which you succinctly address the following:
- Part 1: Define the policy issue. (5 points)
- How is the issue affecting the policy arena?
- What are the current politics of the issue?
- At what level in the policy making process is the issue?
- Part 2: Apply a policy analysis framework to explore the issue using the following contexts (5 points):
- Social
- Ethical
- Legal
- Historical
- Financial / economic
- Theoretical underpinnings of the policy
- Include in this section:
- Who are the stakeholders of interest?
- Is there a nursing policy / position statement on this health care issue? If so, who developed it?
- Part 3: Policy options / solutions (5 points)
- What are the policy options / solutions for addressing the issue? Include at least three levels of options / solutions: no change; partial change; radical change or maximum change.
- What are the theoretical underpinnings of the policy options / solutions?
- What are the health advocacy aspects and leadership requirements of each option?
- How does each option / solution provide an opportunity or need for interprofessional collaboration?
- What are the pros and cons of each suggested change? Include the cost benefits, effectiveness, and efficiency of each option along with the utility and feasibility of each option.
- Part 4: Building Consensus (5 points)
- Outline a plan for building consensus around your recommended option / solution for solving the policy issue.
- Part 5: References (5 points)
- Limit your references so this section is no more than 2 pages.
*Note: Up to 5 points (20%) may be deducted for errors in grammar and/or APA style.
| OLD | NEW | |
| Target | Worthy of a professional portfolio; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; | Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; |
| Acceptable | Needs revision to be worthy of a professional portfolio; addresses about 75% of the major subsections in the assignment | Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses about 80% of the major subsections in the assignment |
| Unacceptable | Needs substantial revision to be worthy of a professional portfolio; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment | Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment |
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.