NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT

Walden University NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT                     

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT                     

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT                     

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT                     

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT                     

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT Included After Question

I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT

Throughout this course, you have reviewed Learning Resources on various body systems and completed i-Human Patients Assignments for particular systems. For this i-Human Patients Assignment, you connect the knowledge and skills you gained from each individual assessment to perform a comprehensive head-to-toe physical examination.

Note: You must pass the Week 9 Assignment to pass the course.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

• By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign an i-Human Patients case for this Assignment. Note: Please see the Course Announcements section of the classroom for your i-Human Patients Assignment. 
• Review this week’s Learning Resources. Also review Learning Resources from previous weeks as needed. 
• Access and review this week’s i-Human Patients Case Study Assignment. 

Assignment

As you interact with this week’s i-Human Patients patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human Patients, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human Patients platform. 

Note: You must achieve a total score of at least 80% in order to pass this Assignment. You must pass the Week 9 Assignment to pass the course. Carefully review the Assignment and the rubric to be sure you fully understand the requirements of this Assignment. 

By Day 7 of Week 9

Upload your PDF from i-Human Patients to submit this Assignment. 

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6512_Week 9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome History: Complete an appropriate health history. (Scores are automatically calculated in the i-Human platform.)	20 pts ExcellentAchieves a score of 90–100% 15 pts GoodAchieves a score of 80–89% 10 pts FairAchieves a score of 70–79% 5 pts PoorAchieves a score of 60–69% 0 pts UnsatisfactoryAchieves a score of 59% or below	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Physical Exam: Complete an appropriate physical exam. (Scores are automatically calculated in the i-Human platform.)	20 pts ExcellentAchieves a score of 90–100% 15 pts GoodAchieves a score of 80–89% 10 pts FairAchieves a score of 70–79% 5 pts PoorAchieves a score of 60–69% 0 pts UnsatisfactoryAchieves a score of 59% or below	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome EMR Documentation History of Present Illness: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only	10 pts ExcellentComplete HPI meeting all 5 criteria. 8 pts Good4 requirements are met. 6 pts Fair3 requirements are met. 4 pts Poor1–2 requirements are met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome EMR Documentation Subjective Data Document Current Medications, Review of System: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only	10 pts ExcellentComplete HPI meeting all 5 criteria. 8 pts Good4 requirements are met. 6 pts Fair3 requirements are met. 4 pts Poor1–2 requirements are met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome EMR Documentation Objective Data Document Physical Exam Findings: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Objective findings only	10 pts ExcellentComplete HPI meeting all 5 criteria. 8 pts Good4 requirements are met. 6 pts Fair3 requirements are met. 4 pts Poor1–2 requirements are met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Key Findings: Organize the key findings with the most important first and least important last.	5 pts ExcellentThe key findings are complete and appropriately organized. 4 pts GoodThe key findings are complete but the organization is not correct. 3 pts FairThere are 1–2 key findings missing or organized inappropriately. 2 pts PoorThere are 3 key findings missing and organization is incorrect. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryThere are more than 3 key findings missing and organization is incorrect.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problem Statement: Document a brief and accurate problem statement using professional language that includes the following: 1.) Name or initials, age; 2.) Chief complaint; 3.) Positive and negative subjective findings; 4.) Positive and negative objective findings.	5 pts ExcellentAll requirements are met. 4 pts Good3 requirements are met. 3 pts Fair2 requirements are met. 2 pts Poor1 requirement is met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Management Plan: Use the expert diagnosis provided to create a pertinent, comprehensive, evidenced-based management plan. Address the following criteria in the plan: 1.) Diagnostic tests; 2.) Medications (write out a complete order, even for OTC meds); 3.) Suggested consults/referrals; 4.) Patient education; 5.) Follow-up, including time interval and specific symptoms to prompt a return visit sooner; 6.) Provide rationales for each intervention and include references to support your plan. Clinical practice guidelines should be utilized as applicable.	15 pts ExcellentAll requirements are met. 13 pts Good5 requirements are met. 10 pts Fair4 requirements are met. 7 pts Poor1-3 requirements are met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References and Format: Current APA citations for references in management plan. Use of clinical practice guidelines when applicable.	5 pts Excellent0–1 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable. 4 pts Good2–3 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable. 3 pts Fair4–5 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable. 2 pts Poor6–7 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryMore than 7 errors; clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.	5 pts
Total Points: 100

A Sample Answer for the Assignment: NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT

Title: NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT