NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
Walden University NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How to Write the Body for NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
NURS 651 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns
Various health assessments information, diagnostic tests, evidence-based guidelines and ethical considerations are essential when treating and diagnosing unconscious patients with cardiac arrest. Case study two about a 33-year-old woman who has advanced stage breast cancer and is currently admitted at the emergency room with cardiac arrest. She has been accompanied by her boyfriend in the ambulance and she is not married illustrates how the emergency should be handled by an advanced nurse practitioner (Baker & Marco, 2020).
I will take a number of actions as an advanced nurse practitioner to handle the scenario. First, I will carefully evaluate the patient’s vital signs that include her heart rate, respiration, level of awareness, and blood pressure and are crucial for such a patient in this state, in order to determine how well she is doing. In addition, I would look into her medical background to see if she had ever received breast cancer treatment (Perkins & Nolan, 2022).
She is in cardiac arrest, thus the best course of action would be to start advanced cardiac life support, which includes performing CPR and giving the appropriate drugs, in accordance with current evidence-based guidelines. Evidence for resuscitation has long been compiled using therapeutic and scientific suggestions (Perkins & Nolan, 2022).
Also, I would take the input of the patient’s boyfriend, especially in terms
of decision-making. The boyfriend is capable to offer vital information at this stage. Potential questions to ask would include: (Baker & Marco, 2020).
- Has she had any previous hospitalizations especially for cardiac arrest? (Baker & Marco, 2020).
- Is there next of kin that needs to be contacted to follow up about their condition? (Baker & Marco, 2020).
- Previously has she stated any resuscitation or medication preferences if a cardiac arrest occurs? (Baker & Marco, 2020).
- Does patient have any cultural, religious or personal beliefs that should be considered during her resuscitation or treatment efforts? (Baker & Marco, 2020).
- How long she has been in that state (unconscious and nonresponsive)? (Baker & Marco, 2020).
- Does patient have planned advance directive? (Baker & Marco, 2020).
- What is the patient’s medical history? Does she have an underlying health risk factor or conditions for cardiac arrest? (Baker & Marco, 2020).
- Does she have any adverse reactions or allergies to medication? (Baker & Marco, 2020).
Advanced Practice Nurse Response
In terms of ethics, I would consider the advance decisions that medical professionals must make for patients who are unconscious or in a vegetative state. As there is no advance directive in this circumstance, I shall consult the medical ethics committee or local regulations and laws to identify the appropriate route of immediate action after establishing if patient had an advance directive intended (Zhang, et al., 2021).
Here, I will take into account the necessity to provide appropriate medical care while simultaneously protecting the patient’s rights and interests. In this situation, beneficence is the most relevant ethical factor to take into account. In this case, the medical staff has a moral duty to provide care that is in the patient’s best interests. If the results of the diagnostic tests indicate that her illness is terminal, it can involve providing therapies that aim to extend her life and provide comfort in this case (Baker & Marco, 2020).
When managing the case, an advanced nurse should follow evidence-based recommendations and nursing practice ethics. Before conducting tests, administering treatments, and making drug recommendations, the nurse will take the necessary precautions. Better outcomes for patient and partner will be made possible by careful adherence to the rules and ethical considerations. However, in the absence of explicit directives, discussing the patient’s condition with ethics committee would indeed be possible (Zhang, et al., 2021).
Legally, let’s say someone who is not the patient’s spouse brings the patient in. The healthcare professional in that situation will only divulge information to individuals who have lawfully gained their consent or to those who are permitted to do so by law. However, after confirming his relationship with the patient, the lover will be treated as a designated representative and permitted to obtain some information about the patient’s condition (Perkins & Nolan, 2022).
References
Zhang, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2021). Patient privacy and autonomy: A comparative analysis of cases of ethical dilemmas in China and the United States. Links to an external site.BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021- 00579-6
Perkins, G. D., & Nolan, J. P. (2022). Advanced life support update. Critical Care 26(73), https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-022-03912-6.
Baker, E. F., & Marco, C. A. (2020). Advance directives in the emergency department. J Am CollEmerg Physicians Open 1(3), 270-275
It is not uncommon for nurses advanced practice nurses to encounter situations where a patient’s wishes regarded their health are in conflict with the family’s wishes, professional experience, or evidence hence creating ethical dilemmas (Haahr et al., 2020). Therefore, it is important for an advanced practice nurse to make informed decisions that can positively impact the patient’s condition.
The case considered in this assignment is for a 60-year-old man who was diagnosed with inclusive body myositis several years ago and is currently facing a rapid decline in his condition. While the patient prefers to be at home and get end-of-life care from there, the wife is of the opinion that her husband is admitted to the inpatient care setting.
Making a better decision regarding this case requires particular assessment information. Inclusive body myositis exposes the patients to falls; hence this patient is at risk of falling (Weihl, 2019). I would assess the patient’s quality of life and ability to undertake daily life activities. Assessing the proficiency of the home caregiving would be key in determining whether the partner can offer good care and give moral support.
An appropriate response to this scenario requires that I consider ethics as an advanced practice nurse. Guided by nursing ethics, I would strive to educate the family and the patient to ensure that they have sufficient knowledge regarding the condition and how the family can help take care of the patient. After the assessment,
I would also collaborate with the patient’s wife and other family members to help come up with an appropriate care plan which is likely to have a better impact on the patient’s condition. These actions are in accordance with the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, which involve doing the right and good thing for the patient and doing no harm (McDermott-Levy et al., 2018). I would also ensure that I treat the patient’s medical details with confidentiality.
References
Haahr, A., Norlyk, A., Martinsen, B., & Dreyer, P. (2020). Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: A review. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0969733019832941
McDermott-Levy, R., Leffers, J., & Mayaka, J. (2018). Ethical principles and guidelines of global health nursing practice. Nursing Outlook, 66(5), 473-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2018.06.013
Weihl, C. C. (2019). Sporadic inclusion body myositis and other rimmed vacuolar myopathies. CONTINUUM: Lifelong Learning in Neurology, 25(6), 1586-1598. Doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000790
As an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient’s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family’s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?
In this Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.
To Prepare
Review the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your scenarios.
- Based on the scenarios provided:
- Select one scenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.
- What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?
- Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.
The Lab Assignment
Write a detailed one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.
By Day 6 of Week 11
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 11 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 6 of Week 11
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 11 Assignment
Week 11: The Ethics Behind Assessment
Consider the following scenarios:
- You are a nurse at a large county hospital. One of your patients is leaning toward selecting a certain radical treatment for cancer, to which the family is in opposition. The family is concerned about making the correct decision and asks for your advice.
- The state of Oregon has passed a “Death with Dignity” act that allows for euthanasia in certain situations. One of your patients suffering from terminal cancer is thinking of moving there to take advantage of this law and asks your opinion.
Throughout this course, you have explored a wide range of health assessments and abnormal examination findings. Although you have
predominantly focused on the procedural aspects of health assessment, this week, you will focus on ethical considerations that should be taken into account when advising patients or their families.
This week, you will consider how evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations factor into health assessments. You will also evaluate health assessment concepts related to sports physicals and well-child and well-woman examinations.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Apply evidence-based practice guidelines to make an informed healthcare decision
- Apply ethical considerations to a health assessment response
- Apply concepts, theories, and principles relating to sports physicals and well-child and well-woman examinations
- Identify concepts, theories, and principles related to advanced health assessment
Learning Resources
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
- Chapter 24, “Sports Participation Evaluation”In this chapter, the authors describe the process of a sports participation evaluation. The chapter also states the most common conditions encountered in a sports participation evaluation.
- Chapter 25, “Putting It All Together”In this chapter, the authors tie together the concepts introduced in previous chapters. In particular, the chapter has a strong emphasis on the patient-caregiver relationship.
Tingle, J. & Cribb, A. (2014). Nursing law and ethics (4th ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Document: Final Exam Review (Word document)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)
Module 4 Introduction
Dr. Tara Harris reviews the overall expectations for Module 4. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources for your Case Study Lab Assignment and your Final exam (3m).
The patient is in advanced-stage cancer, and the effective discussion should be on life care and discussion of wishes and needs. In the case presented, the patient has tested positive for advanced-stage cancer and is presented in the emergency unit for cardiac arrest. In this write-up, I will provide a detailed narrative explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis regarding the presented case.
I would determine the cardiac arrest using an ECG and the life-saving measures as defined in the ACL protocols (Nelson & Lewis, 2017). Once I am able to stabilize the patient, I would ask the boyfriend if the patient has an advanced directive or will concerning the resuscitation status. The advanced directive is a legal document relaying more information on the life savings of the patient (Rossetti, 2017).
In this case, I would ask the boyfriend who can connect to the next of kin in case the boyfriend is not the next of kin. This would happen if the patient is unconscious or does not have the mental capacity to make important decisions. Effective decisions for resuscitation would wait, but until then, I will make every attempt to stabilize the patient.
I will respect the wish of the patient and the family. If the patient and the family agree that they need all interventions and the patient is stable on life support machines, then further investigation into brain function and viability will be conducted (Ozmen et al., 2019). Diagnostic testing would reveal the extent of brain damage and cardiopulmonary stability that would aid in determining the status of my patient and viability. I will then discuss the patient’s condition with the family to get ready for any result that would come from the treatment offered to the patient.
A confirmation that the brain cells of the patient are dead and the family is not ready to stop the life support measures, the hospital can change the status of the patient to “do not resuscitate” with approval from two physicians (Nelson & Lewis, 2017). However, providers will ensure that the family confirms the decision. This would be important in avoiding ethical dilemmas.
References
Nelson, A., & Lewis, A. (2017). Determining brain death: basic approach and controversial issues. American Journal of Critical Care, 26(6), 496-500. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2017540
Ozmen, O., Aksoy, M., Atalay, C., Aydin, M. D., Dostbil, A., Ince, I., & Sener, E. (2019). Are unresponsive dilated pupils an indicator for brain death? an evaluation of Edinger Westphal nucleus in rabbits with brain death. Annals of Medical Research, 26(10), 2376-2381. https://annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/3711
Rossetti, A. O. (2017). Clinical neurophysiology for neurological prognostication of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 2, 76-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2017.03.001
Case study 2 depicts a single father who accompanies his 17-year-old daughter to a women’s health clinic and requests a pregnancy test for his daughter. The daughter does not consent to the test and appears uneasy. Vital health assessment information required to establish if the girl is pregnant includes her menstrual history (Dyer et al., 2018).
The nurse should inquire about the date of her last menstrual period (LMP), menstrual pattern, duration of her menses, and frequency. In addition, the nurse should obtain the client’s sexual history, including if she is sexually active, the contraceptives she uses, and the frequency of using contraceptives. The nurse should also gather information on presumptive signs of pregnancy, including amenorrhea, nausea, vomiting, generalized malaise, and breast tenderness (Gadsby et al., 2021).
This case presents an ethical dilemma since the girl’s father insists on a pregnancy test against her wish. The provider also has an ethical duty to promote the confidentiality of the patient’s information. Thus, I would ensure privacy when interviewing the girl in her father’s absence and assure her that the information she gives will be kept confidential. To address this ethical dilemma, I would observe the rule that the patient, in this case, is the girl and not the parent (Larcher & Brierley, 2018). Thus, I would only perform the pregnancy test if the girl consented. This is because conducting the test against the girl’s wish poses the risk of psychological harm.
Sharkey and Griffiths (2019) explain that children above 16 years are considered competent to consent to treatment, including pregnancy testing. Patients should be asked sensitively about the likelihood of pregnancy and offered a pregnancy test with their consent if there is doubt. If the girl continues to decline even after counseling her, I would inform her father that a pregnancy test cannot be conducted against the patient’s wish since it will violate her right to autonomy.
References
Dyer, J., Latendresse, G., Cole, E., Coleman, J., & Rothwell, E. (2018). Content of First Prenatal Visits. Maternal and child health journal, 22(5), 679–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2436-y
Gadsby, R., Ivanova, D., Trevelyan, E., Hutton, J. L., & Johnson, S. (2021). The onset of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03478-7
Larcher, V., & Brierley, J. (2018). Developing guidance for pregnancy testing of adolescents participating in research: ethical, legal and practical considerations. Archives of disease in childhood, 101(10), 980–983. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-310725
Sharkey, E., & Griffiths, S. (2019). The ethics of pregnancy testing. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 20(9), 511-514.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2019.06.006
Assignment 1: Lab
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6512_Week_11_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Write a detailed 1-page narrative (not a formal paper) addressing the following:
· Explain the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). |
Points Range: 30 (30%) – 35 (35%)
The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included. |
Points Range: 24 (24%) – 29 (29%)
The response accurately explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included. |
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 23 (23%)
The response vaguely explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number, correct or inaccurate, included. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response lacks and/or inaccurately explains assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number inaccurate or missing. |
|
| · Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature. | Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with clear, accurate, and thorough justification using three or more different references from current evidence-based literature. |
Points Range: 39 (39%) – 44 (44%)
The response accurately explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with accurate justification using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature. |
Points Range: 33 (33%) – 38 (38%)
The response vaguely explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with vague and/or inaccurate justification using two to three different references from current evidence-based literature. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 32 (32%)
The response inaccurately explains or lacks evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with inaccurate or missing justification using two or fewer references from current evidence-based literature. |
|
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
|
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
|
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 651 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
LAB ASSIGNMENT: ETHICAL CONCERNS
As an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient’s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family’s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?
In this Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
TO PREPARE
Review the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your scenarios.
· Based on the scenarios provided:
o Select one scenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.
o What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?
o Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.
THE LAB ASSIGNMENT
Write a detailed one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.
BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 11
Submit your Assignment.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_6512_Week_11_Assignment_Rubric
| NURS_6512_Week_11_Assignment_Rubric | ||||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a detailed 1-page narrative (not a formal paper) addressing the following:· Explain the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). |
| 35 pts | ||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature. |
| 50 pts | ||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
| 5 pts | ||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
| 5 pts | ||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
| 5 pts | ||||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.