NURS 6501 Case Study Analysis Advanced Pathophysiology

NURS 6501 Case Study Analysis Advanced Pathophysiology

Case Study Analysis: Implications for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Based on Patient Characteristics

Understanding the intricacies of human health requires a holistic approach, considering not just the overt symptoms but also the nuanced differences that arise due to gender, racial, and ethnic variations. Diseases and disorders, especially in the realms of fertility, infections, and hematologic disorders, often manifest distinctly based on such parameters. The following analysis explores the specific scenario of a 32-year-old female patient presenting with symptoms consistent with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).

Patient Presentation

A 32-year-old female presented to the emergency department (ED) with a constellation of symptoms including fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, vaginal discharge, left lower quadrant (LLQ) pain, bilateral lower back pain, and 99% on room air. Cardio-respiratory exam within normal limits with the exception of tachycardia but no murmurs, rubs, clicks, or gallops. Despite the absence of dysuria, the patient’s pelvic exam revealed significant findings, including copious foul-smelling green drainage, reddened cervix, and bilateral adenexal tenderness, suggestive of an active infectious process.

Lab Findings

The patient’s complete blood count (CBC) was significant for leukocytosis (WBC 18), which suggests an active systemic inflammatory process. The elevated sedimentation rate (46 mm/hr) and C-reactive protein (67 mg/L) further reinforced the presence of inflammation. The wet prep from the pelvic examination was positive for clue cells, while the gram stain demonstrated gram-negative diplococci. These findings are consistent with bacterial vaginosis and gonorrhea, respectively.

Factors That Affect Fertility (STDs)

Sexually transmitted diseases can significantly impact fertility in both men and women. Chlamydia and gonorrhea, in particular, can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in women, resulting in tubal blockage, which prevents the union of sperm and egg (Ogbonmwan et al., 2021). The patient in the scenario presented with foul-smelling vaginal discharge, a critical symptom indicative of STDs, specifically pointing towards gonorrhea given the presence of gram-negative diplococci. The presence of such infections, if left untreated, can pose risks to her fertility.

online nursing essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NURS 6501 Case Study Analysis Advanced Pathophysiology done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NURS 6501 Case Study Analysis Advanced Pathophysiology

An understanding of the factors surrounding women’s and men’s health, infections, and hematologic disorders can be critically important to disease diagnosis and treatment in these areas. This importance is magnified by the fact that some diseases and disorders manifest differently based on the sex of the patient.

nurs 6501 case study analysis advanced pathophysiology
NURS 6501 Case Study Analysis Advanced Pathophysiology

Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond the human systems involved. The impact of patient characteristics, as well as racial and ethnic variables, can also have an important impact..

An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in systems based on these characteristics is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6501 Case Study Analysis Advanced Pathophysiology

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

The factors that affect fertility (STDs).

Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.

Why prostatitis and infection happens. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

Why a patient would need a splenectomy after a diagnosis of ITP.

Anemia and the different kinds of anemia (i.e., micro and macrocytic).

Day 7 of Week 10

Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

Click the Module 7 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

Click the Module 7  Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “M7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.

If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.

Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Case Study Analysis

An understanding of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the fact that these two systems work so closely together. A variety of factors and circumstances that impact the emergence and severity of issues in one system can have a role in the performance of the other.

Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their capacity to work together. The impact of patient characteristics, as well as racial and ethnic variables, can also have an important impact.

An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in cardiovascular and respiratory systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

The Assignment

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following

  • The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.

By day 7 of Week 4

Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates

Links to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as MD2Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

NURS_6501_Module2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Module2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examing the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following:Explain both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.
30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 ptsGood

The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >22.0 ptsFair

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes reasons for the cardiovascular and/or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

22 to >0 ptsPoor

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include reasons for either the cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Explain how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.
30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

27 to >24.0 ptsGood

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

24 to >22.0 ptsFair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

22 to >0 ptsPoor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

22 to >19.0 ptsGood

The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

19 to >17.0 ptsFair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or explanations based on inappropriate evidence/research.

17 to >0 ptsPoor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.