NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
Walden University NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How to Write the Body for NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
NURS 6053 Week 3 Discussion Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues
Healthcare systems, networks, and providers focus on offering quality care using innovative delivery models that reduces the overall cost while increasing accessibility. Imperatively, they develop sound and targeted policies to attain these goals but face competing needs like the needs of the healthcare workforce, patients, and limited resources (Griffiths et al., 2020). For example, healthcare organizations can address the workforce needs and those of patients using policies aimed at having optimal nurse staffing levels to reduce nurse shortage, improve quality, and prevent burnout syndrome that leads to nurse turnover. However, these competing needs may mean that the organization increases its costs and reduce their profit margins. The use of sufficient workforce in healthcare organizations ensures that the facility offers quality care to diverse patient population. The increasing demand for care emanating from an aging population and reforms in healthcare that lead to increased access mean that organizations should employ more nurses to bridge the gap.
Specific Competing Needs that Impacts Nurse Shortage
Nurse shortage is a significant problem that requires organizations to develop effective policies because of their competing needs. Nurse shortage leads to high turnover rates and is associated with quality care outcomes. Nurse shortage leads to increased workload and burnout syndrome which implies that organizations should develop policies to ensure that they have optimal nurse levels or staffing levels to address the issue (Kelly & Porr, 2018). As a national health stressor, nursing shortage emanates from the competing needs between patients’ need for quality care and organization’s focus on becoming sustainability while navigating the delicate obligation to have sufficient workforce in their operations.
High costs of healthcare emerge in different areas like cost of drugs, provider reimbursement and even running nursing home care facilities and high costs of better medical equipment that impact the ability of facilities to hire sufficient levels of staff. The employment of more nurses alongside these expenses with the aim of delivering quality care compete with the need to offer quality patient care (Lucchini et al., 2020). The implication is that such facilities should develop policies that will lead to better staff levels and ensure quality care in different areas of care delivery. Policies to emphasize innovative solutions are essential in this case to help the organization address the competing needs of ensuring a happy and satisfied workforce, management of scarce or limited resources that include financial resources, and offering quality care.
Impact of Policy on Competing Needs
The use of new staff scheduling systems by developing a staffing pool can help address the staffing needs. Healthcare providers can use their staff more efficiently in attempts to reduce the overall labor costs and deliver quality care (Kelly & Porr, 2018). For example, hospital organizations can reduce the need to use nurses in moving patients to and from emergency units and instead use other health providers like nurse assistants. Such policies can save the organizations from increased cost of paying the nurses hourly wages for the services which they can plough back and compensate the nursing staff through benefits.
Further, the organization will reduce nurse workload and employee turnover (Milliken, 2018). Training new nurses and employees in general is costly. Having competitive package and benefits and maintenance of the current staff as well as recognition of their efforts is essential to address nursing shortage and improving quality of care for patients in different areas of care provision. Policies are intended to improve the quality of care and reduce the competing needs in healthcare organizations. Nurses’ needs can compete with the need of offering quality care as it implies that organizations must have sufficient levels of staff while this requires additional resources.
References
Griffiths, P., Saville, C., Ball, J., Jones, J., Pattison, N., Monks, T., & Safer Nursing Care Study
Group. (2020). Nursing workload, nurse staffing methodologies and tools: A systematic scoping review and discussion. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 103, 103487. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103487.
Kelly, P., & Porr, C. (2018). Ethical Nursing Care Versus Cost Containment: Considerations to
Enhance RN Practice. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1).
DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No01Man06
Lucchini, A., Iozzo, P., & Bambi, S. (2020). Nursing workload in the COVID-19 era. Intensive
& critical care nursing, 61, 102929. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102929
Milliken, A. (2018). Ethical awareness: What it is and why it matters. OJIN: The Online Journal
of Issues in Nursing, 23(1). DOI:10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No01Man01
Name: NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Posting |
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.Supported by at least three current, credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
|
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
|
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Main Post: Timeliness |
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
|
First Response |
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.
|
Second Response |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.
|
Participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
|
Total Points: 100 |
---|

Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.