NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION
Walden University NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How to Write the Body for NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION Included After Question
CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION
In Week 5 you will write the final section your Capstone Paper. The Assignment you will submit this week will combine the work you completed in Week 4 (Evidenced-Based Practice Plan) and will integrate the Resources and Conclusion details in approximately 3-5 paragraphs for your Capstone Paper. Be sure to include scholarly references identified in the literature review to support your EBP plan. Use appropriate and persuasive language that communicates meaning with clarity and fluency to readers, and is virtually error-free.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare for this Assignment:
- Review the Capstone Paper Assignment GuideDownload Capstone Paper Assignment Guide
- Locate the most current version of your Week 4 Assignment. You will add these sections to that document.
- Review the new expectations for Use of evidence and Credit to Source:
- http://academLinks to an external site.icguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoiceLinks to an external site.
- http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/scholarlywriting#s-lg-box-2773859Links to an external site.
- Review the Walden University Writing Center webpage: Using Evidence: SynthesisLinks to an external site.
- Review the Week 5 Assignment Rubric
- Review Chapter 5 in your Spath text for examples of practice improvement plans.
- Spath, P. (2018). Introduction to healthcare quality management (3rd ed.). Health Administration Press.
- Refer to Writing Center guidelines for how to write a summary.
Write a 3–4-page paper that addresses the following:
Introduction. Briefly review your practice problem and include a purpose statement. Include data to support the problem.
- Evidence-Based Practice Plan Explanation (Completed in Week 4)
- Provide a detailed explanation of the evidence-based practice quality improvement plan that you will use to address the practice problem.
- Support your plan with scholarly references (the sources you found in the analysis of the evidence).
- Resources (new in Week 5)
- Describe the resources needed to support the change in practice such as personnel time, supplies for staff education, cost of new equipment, or cost of software.
- Explain why each resource is necessary.
- Conclusion
- Discuss all key points addressed in this assignment.
BY DAY 7
Submit your Assignment
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_4220_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Content: Provided a detailed explanation of the evidence-based practice quality improvement plan used to address the practice problem. | 60 to >49.0 ptsExcellentProvided a fully developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.49 to >39.0 ptsProficientProvided a developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.39 to >29.0 ptsBasicProvided a minimally developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.29 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvided an under-developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. | 60 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Content: Described resources that will be needed to support the change in practice and explained why each resource is necessary. | 40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentProvided a fully developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.35 to >31.0 ptsProficientProvided a developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.31 to >27.0 ptsBasicProvided a minimally developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.27 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvided an under-developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. | 40 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Content: Provided a comprehensive concluding summary with no new additional information included. | 20 to >14.0 ptsExcellentProvided a fully developed summary with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.14 to >10.0 ptsProficientProvided a developed summary with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.10 to >5.0 ptsBasicProvided a minimally developed summary with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.5 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvided an under-developed summary with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. | 20 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization | 10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentContent is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.8 to >7.0 ptsProficientContent contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.7 to >6.0 ptsBasicContent contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.6 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization. | 10 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone | 10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentContent clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.8 to >7.0 ptsProficientContent demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.7 to >6.0 ptsBasicContent demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.6 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing. | 10 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas | 10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentContent reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.8 to >7.0 ptsProficientContent adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.7 to >6.0 ptsBasicContent somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.6 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference. | 10 pts | |
| Total Points: 150 | |||
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION
Title: NURS 4220 CAPSTONE PAPER, PART II: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, RESOURCES AND CONCLUSION
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.