NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process Included After Question

In 500-750 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.

Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.

Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.

Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.

Describe implications for practice and future research.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Note: After submitting the assignment, you will receive feedback from the instructor. Use this feedback to make revisions for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

Title: NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

Description of the Rationale for the Methods used in Collecting the Outcome Data

Utilization of various techniques for collecting the outcome data was informed by different reasons. For instance, questionnaires were used due to many essential elements that can be used to determine the rate of satisfaction in the whole process of data collection. Other techniques such as follow-ups, clinical interviews, and chart audits were utilized to support the participants and determine areas that needed improvement. Moreover, the test monitoring was utilized to trail the development of the project, establish the suitability of the implementation process, and gather the information to help in the future implementation efforts (Hennink et al., 2020).

The way Outcome Measures Evaluate the Extent to which the Project Objectives are Achieved

The outcome measures can help in assessing the extent to which the project objectives were achieved by evaluating the degree in which the project implementation has influenced the health outcomes for the target population. Moreover, the outcome measures can help to determine whether or not the project has achieved the objectives (Gibbons et al., 2016). In situations where the objectives are not met, the outcome measures can help in making changes to ensure realization of the objectives.

How the Outcomes will be Measured and Evaluated Based on the Evidence

The measurement and evaluation of outcome data will be conducted by standard data collection tools that have been proven to be effective (Stover et al., 2020). However, these tools are required to be realigned or developed to meet the local needs of the target population. Moreover, it is recommended to perform preliminary test prior to rolling out of the measures to the target population. On the other hand, the validity will be established if the data accurately measure what they are needed to measure. The reliability on its side will be determined if the outcomes measures match with standard deifications and methods. On the other side, the applicability will be determined when the outcome measures improves screening for cervical cancer among the target population.

Description of the Strategies to take if Outcomes do not Provide Positive Results

The ideal strategy the implementation team can use when the outcomes do not provide positive results is to take control, stay focused, and develop a centralized communication system to help in managing the project and taking it back to the right track. The other strategy is to design the project with flexibility that enables adjustment in case the outcomes fail to yield positive outcomes. The implementation team should also be able to recognize the root cause of the problem, acknowledge areas of problem, and take initiatives to address the problems, and strive to find solutions to the appropriate implementation path. Moreover, contingency plans should be in place, which are the fall back measures of the project (Kerzner, 2018).

Description of the Implications for Practice and Future Research

The aim of this project was to implement education program to help in creating awareness on the benefits of cervical cancer screening among women. Although nurse educators can play crucial role for the success of this project, they may face challenges of cultural competency educational interventions. Failure to take cultural practices and values while delivering educational programs on cervical cancer screening can lead to adverse outcomes (Purnell & Fenkl, 2019). Therefore, it is recommended that the future studies need to emphasize on adopting culturally responsive educational programs when dealing with diverse population like in the present project.

NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process References

Gibbons, E., Black, N., Fallowfield, L., Newhouse, R., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2016). Patient-reported outcome measures and the evaluation of services. In Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health. NIHR Journals Library. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK361255/

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage.

Kerzner, H. (2018). Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. John Wiley & Sons.

Purnell, L. D., & Fenkl, E. A. (2019). Transcultural diversity and health care. In Handbook for culturally competent care (pp. 1-6). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21946-8_1

Stover, A. M., Haverman, L., van Oers, H. A., Greenhalgh, J., & Potter, C. M. (2020). Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings. Quality of Life Research, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9

In 500-750 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.

Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.

Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.

Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.

Describe implications for practice and future research.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Note: After submitting the assignment, you will receive feedback from the instructor. Use this feedback to make revisions for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.