NUR 550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

NUR 550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

NUR 550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NUR 550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Use the \”Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template\” to compare three types of translational research with traditional (qualitative or quantitative) research. Make sure to include methodology, goals, and data collection in your organizer.

The population identified for the research involves African Americans suffering from Type 2 diabetes. African Americans are considered to have a higher risk of type 2 diabetes compared to other races. In most cases, obesity, genetic traits, as well as insulin resistance contributes to the risk of type 2 diabetes. Black Americans have the highest rates of diabetic complications as a result of the racial disparities in the healthcare system and poor glycaemic control. Afro-Americans suffering from diabetes often possess atypical presentation that simulates type 1 diabetes, however, there succeeding clinical course is a typical type 2 diabetes. Socially, the assistance from nurses, structured disease management protocols, diabetic educators, as well as the interventions of other medical professionals are some of the effective measures when it comes to the management of type 2 diabetic among the African Americans in the United States (Carpenter, DiChiacchio & Barker, 2019). Type 2 diabetes is the most common type of diabetes and it begins after forty years. The body is unable to make enough or properly use insulin which results in increased blood sugar levels. Research indicates that black adults are at higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to white adults.

Synthesis of Nursing Science, Determinants of Health, and

Epidemiologic and Genetic Data

The application of nursing science is essential in the management of type 2 diabetes among African Americans. With the application of evidenced-based practices as well as the community interventions, African Americans who have low income can access the medical system and nursing care that can enable them control physiological factors that can lead to type 2 diabetes. For instance, nursing interventions that are geared towards reducing obesity are some of the essential factors when it comes to the management or control of obesity among African Americans. Changing the lifestyle, nutritional practices, and creation of a healthy environment are some of the health determinants that can be used to manage type 2 diabetes or factors that may lead to it among African Americans (Hu et al., 2016). The epidemiological approaches and genomic studies among African Americans are some of the approaches that can be used to identify the best intervention approaches in the management of type 2 diabetes or the conditions associated with it such as obesity.

The foundation of handling type 2 diabetes is lifestyle changes. The use of pharmacological agents should supplement diet and exercise and should not replace them. Research reveals that intensive lifestyle interventions prevent the progression of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes effectively than metformin. Nevertheless, African Americans lack intensification of treatment and thus do not achieve adequate glycemic control. The population does not comply with self-monitoring or adhere to treatment due to economic factors, literacy levels, sociocultural factors and lack of diabetes education (Chlebowy et al., 2019). These challenges can be dealt with if providers follow the recommendation from the American Diabetes Association. The presence of genetic data may impact the population health management. In other words, the data may be used in the study of other factors or conditions that may be associated with type 2 diabetes. For instance, data on obesity among African Americans may be applied in the determination of the presence of hemoglobin A1C, a genome linked to the type 2 diabetes.

Potential Solution for Solving the Problem of Type 2 Diabetes

Among African Americans

One of the potential solution to type 2 diabetes is lifestyle change. Embracing physical exercise and eating healthy is essential in reducing health complications that lead to diabetes. Also, there is the need for interventions, facilitating preventive factors and practices that can lower in the incidences if type 2 diabetes among African Americans (Konstantinos, 2018). The adoption or application of the nurse-led diabetes self-assessment education may often lead to the reduction of complications caused by the conditions, as well as other conditions such as end-stage renal diseases. Assessments are important in ensuring earlier diagnosis and as well as the development of appropriate interventions that may enable patients adhere to the control measures aimed at prolonging their lives.

PICOT Statement

African Americans are vulnerable to type 2 diabetes due to their lifestyle and the inability to get quality care from healthcare institutions. When compared to other races, African Americans lead with the highest number of infections of type 2 diabetes.

PICOT Question

What are some of the potential solution to type 2 diabetes among African Americans?

How the Solution Incorporate Health Policies

The solution to type 2 diabetes among African Americans incorporate different health policies and goals that support healthcare quality. The general goals of the healthcare institution is to ensure a healthy population. Encouraging physical exercise and lifestyle change is a general call that ensure reduction in the cardiovascular diseases associated with type 2 diabetes. Health policies also stipulate that prevention is better than cure. Therefore, with the intervention mechanisms from both the healthcare system and personal decisions, it will be much easier to control diabetes among African American population. Increasing the quality of life among the African Americans who have Type 2 diabetes is an essential step that would ensure a reduction in deaths as well as the severity of the disease.

References

Carpenter, R., DiChiacchio, T., & Barker, K. (2019). Interventions for self-management of type 2 diabetes: An integrative review. International journal of nursing sciences, 6(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.12.002

Chlebowy, D. O., Batscha, C., Kubiak, N., & Crawford, T. (2019). Relationships of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress with Adherence to Self-Management Behaviors and Diabetes Measures in African American Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 6(1), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-018-0500-3

Hu, J., Amirehsani, K. A., Wallace, D. C., McCoy, T. P., & Silva, Z. (2016). A family-based, culturally tailored diabetes intervention for Hispanics and their family members. The Diabetes Educator, 42(3), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721716636961

Konstantinos, K. (2018). Self-Care Management of African American Men with Type 2 Diabetes. Walden University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4930/

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

 

Also Check Out: NUR 514 Week 1 DQ2 From your experience, how can developing strong interprofessional relationships increase collaboration and benefit patient outcomes or organizational initiatives?

 

   Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research Why the distinction between basic (theoretical) and applied (practical) research is important in the politics of science Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology  Translation research requires the researcher to be directly involved with the variables to ensure the intended outcome is reached (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015). The researcher controls dependent variable during the research process.

 

 

 

 

Methodologies used in traditional research for data collection included face-to-face focus groups, interviews, surveys (Roll-Hansen, 2013). Both are complex and hypothesis-oriented researches

In both research, the researcher designs and actively participate in the research process. Also, in both, the end objective of the research is not directly specified in the beginning and the process results in solving the intended research problem.

Goals  Translation research is a highly interdisciplinary field and the goal is primarily to combine the assets of these various disciplines, resources, and expertise into one group to improve the global healthcare system significantly (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015). The results are to promote enhancements in prevention, diagnosis, and therapies in health care. Traditional research is a systematic process that requires a standard scientific method (Al-Hadithy, 2015). The research is used to improve knowledge by the researchers (Roll-Hansen, 2013). The difference between translational and traditional research is that fundamentally translational research focuses on improve practice rather than producing knowledge as with traditional research (Al-Hadithy, 2015).

Translational research is also requires high demand for personal commitment and involvement unlike in comparison to traditional research.

Data Collection Translation research utilizes standardized questionnaires or interviews are utilized when preforming data collection (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015).

 

 

 

 

Traditional reserch can use phone interviews, online surveys, and structured questionnaires (Roll-Hansen, 2013). The reserch can have a large sample size and hence demands more time to ensure high quality data is collected. Data management programs are also utilized as randomizing, trending, and predicting instrument, which help the researchers processes and analyze data. In both methods, the researchers utilized questionnaires and interviews when collecting their data.

In translational research, the researchers had freedom of controlling the dependent variables to ensure the desired outcomes were achieved, while in traditional research, the researcher answers the questions that the research aimed to answer.

References

NUR 550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template
NUR 550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NUR 550 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

Roll-Hansen, N. (2013). “Why the distinction between basic (theoretical) and applied (practical) research is important in the politics of science” (PDF) (Report). The London School of Economics and Political Science.

Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., Mercier, S. (2015). “Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research”, European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier Ltd, 42 (28): 3140–3148, doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.07.020.

Al-Hadithy, T. (2015). The Traditional Vs. The Modern Translation Classroom: A Need for New Directions in the UAE Undergraduate Translation Programs. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,192, 180-187. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.026 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples

Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template

 

  <Type Translational Research Type Here> <Type Traditional (Qualitative or Quantitative) Research Type Here> Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology  

 

 

 

 

 

   
Goals  

 

 

 

 

 

  Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples
Data Collection  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples rubric

Course Code Class Code
NUR-550 NUR-550-O101 Translational Research Graphic Organizer 100.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Translational Research Graphic Organizer 100.0% Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples
Comparison of Research in Relation to Methodology 25.0% A comparison of research in relation to methodology is not included. A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present. A comparison of research in relation to methodology is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to methodology is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Comparison of Research in Relation to Goals 25.0% A comparison of research in relation to goals is not included. A comparison of research in relation to goals is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of research in relation to goals is present. A comparison of research in relation to goals is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to goals is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Comparison of Research in Relation to Data Collection 25.0% A comparison of research in relation to data collection is not included. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison research in relation to data collection is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Presentation 10.0% The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100% Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples

In this class we will be exploring translational research and Evidence Based Practice as well as forming a PICOT question. This will be a very busy week as translational research may be a new topic for you and you will need to decide on a population and intervention to begin your PICOT question. Our goals for this week are:

Identify the different levels of translational research.
Differentiate translational research from evidence-based practice.
Discuss the application of translational research to population health management.
Evaluate sources of translational research.
Select a valid nursing practice problem for an evidence-based practice project proposal.

Please proceed to the Class Wall and tell us a little about yourself. When you complete your introduction be sure to read the policies, syllabus and weekly expectations.

You will be expected to submit answers to two DQs and to respond to at least three peers. Two posts will be your DQs and you need a minimum of 3 responses in addition to your 2 DQs. Each DQ must be at least 150 words or 12 sentences and must have two references and citations. Quotes are not allowed. Responses must be at least 75 words or 5 sentences and have one reference and a citation.

As your PICOT question must be based on a mortality/morbidity indicator related to a clinical problem affecting a population, make sure to review all of the Study Materials and locate the website for your state or county health department. DO NOT include any information about nurse staffing, staffing ratios, staffing levels (shortages), or major system-level changes in your question. Your materials include a template for the beginning of your PICOT question. This template must be followed.

Please be sure to use the link to the GCU library provided and then click on Translational Research on the left as you will need this site to search for the literature you will need and to answer your DQs.

Refer to the calendar for the due date of the assignments. Be sure to submit your papers to LopesWrite to evaluate for plagiarism. However, please note that your first paper due this week does not need to be submitted to LopesWrite.

Please use the Questions to Instructor forum for your questions or your Private Forum for private communication. You may also reach me at between the hours of 8AM-8PM EST. All questions are welcome.

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-550 NUR-550-O500 Translational Research Graphic Organizer 100.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Translational Research Graphic Organizer 100.0%
Comparison of Research in Relation to Methodology 25.0% A comparison of research in relation to methodology is not included. A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present. A comparison of research in relation to methodology is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to methodology is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison of Research in Relation to Goals 25.0% A comparison of research in relation to goals is not included. A comparison of research in relation to goals is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of research in relation to goals is present. A comparison of research in relation to goals is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to goals is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison of Research in Relation to Data Collection 25.0% A comparison of research in relation to data collection is not included. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present. A comparison of research in relation to data collection is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison research in relation to data collection is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Presentation 10.0% The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some

Name:  Assignment Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month. 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values.

An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague.

The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing.

An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing.

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing.

Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month. 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Assignment Rubric