NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table

Healthcare organizations are dealing with pressing issues that require immediate attention. Medical errors, delayed patient discharge, hospital-acquired infections, and other issues are just some of the ways public health can suffer. Quality improvement, according to Sauers et al. (2017), is a concept that ensures healthcare practitioners provide high-quality, safe, timely, and patient-centered care. As a result, in order to improve healthcare services and promote population health, nurse leaders and managers should incorporate translational research into quality improvement programs. In this case, physical activity and healthy eating habits benefit population health. Drinking plenty of water and eating a well-balanced diet, according to Baumann, are critical for improving the health of the aging population (2019). Baumann (2019) discovered in a randomized control trial that elderly men and women who did not exercise and had poor eating habits had health issues such as increased body weight, joint issues, and cardiovascular-related issues. As a result, health-care researchers will be able to conduct translational research to determine whether physical activity and a healthy diet promote aging and longevity.

The development of health initiatives aimed at enhancing population health can be influenced by translational research. The four stages of translational research—T1, T2, T3, and T4—have been addressed throughout this course. Stage two (T2), which evaluates the efficacy and effectiveness of health programs, can be incorporated into the ongoing study to assess the relationship between physical activity and healthy eating habits and aging and longevity in the example presented. The results will show whether or not the proposed program would benefit the health of the people, especially the elderly.

Description:

The goal of this assignment is to provide research evidence to back up the PICOT you created for your chosen topic.

Search for 10 peer-reviewed translational research articles published within the last 5 years that support your PICOT. You may include previous research articles from this course’s assignments. Use the provided “Literature Evaluation Table” to assess the articles and explain how the research supports your PICOT.

When your instructor returns this assignment, go over the feedback and make any necessary changes. If your instructor instructs you to choose different articles in order to meet the assignment criteria or to better support your PICOT, do so. You will use the literature evaluated in this assignment for all subsequent assignments you develop in this course and in NUR-590 as part of your evidence-based practice project proposal, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

Re: Topic 5 DQ 1

Healthcare organizations face pressing problems that require swift solutions. Examples of problems include medical errors, delayed patient discharge, hospital-acquired infections, and any others, which in one way or another affects population health. According to Sauers et al. (2017), quality improvement is a concept that ensures health care providers provide high-quality, safe, timely, and patient-centered care. Therefore, to improve population health, nurse leaders and managers should incorporate translational research in developing quality improvement initiatives to improve health care services. For example, in this discussion, physical fitness and healthy eating habits positively impact population health. For instance, Baumann (2019) opined that healthy eating and drinking quality water play a vital role in improving health status among the aging population. In a randomized control trial, Baumann (2019) found that older men and women who did not participate in physical exercise and engaged in bad eating habits experienced health conditions such as increased body weight, joint problems, and cardiovascular-related problems. Therefore, with translational research, health care researchers can assess and evaluate whether physical activities and good eating habits would improve aging and longevity.

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature

Translational research can be used to influence the development of health initiatives aimed at improving the health population. This course has emphasized that translational research involves four stages, T1, T2, T3, and T4. In the given an example, stage two (T2) which test efficacy and effectiveness of health initiatives can be integrated into the current research to evaluate the correlation between physical exercise and good eating habit and aging and longevity. The findings obtained will determine whether the proposed initiative will improve the healthy population, particularly among the elderly.

References

Sauers, A. D. L., PhD., Sauers, Eric L, Ph.D., A.T.C., F.N.A.T.A., & Valier, Alison R Snyder,

Ph.D., A.T.C., F.N.A.T.A. (2017). Quality improvement in athletic health care. Journal of Athletic Training, 52(11), 1070-1078. doi:http://dx.doi.org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.4085/1062-6050-52.10.15

Baumann, S. & (2019). Lost in Translation. Nursing Science Quarterly, 32 (1), 68-72. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0894318418807927

 

RESPOND HERE (150 WORDS, 3 REFERENCES)

Hello Listra,

I do agree with your statement that healthcare organizations face many daily challenges that range from simple operational problems to complex clinical and medical errors that put the lives of the patients in danger. Healthcare organizations and professionals have a responsibility of ensuring that they do offer quality care that helps promote the safety of patients, proper recovery and reduced chances of readmission. In order to achieve these objectives, it is imperative for healthcare organizations to carry out proper EBP and enhance translational research that will put the EBP outcomes into proper clinical practice (Weiss et al., n.d.). One example of clinical challenge where translational research is crucial is the reduction in catheter -associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) among patients in the renal department. The EBP research outcomes focuses on educational programs for the nurses and short-term indwelling as some of the efficient methods of reducing incidences of CAUTI (Atkins et al., 2020). Additionally, in order to achieve the desired objectives, it is imperative to enhance multidisciplinary teams’ approach and collaborative working.

References

Atkins, L., Sallis, A., Chadborn, T., Shaw, K., Schneider, A., Hopkins, S., Bunten, A., Michie, S., & Lorencatto, F. (2020). Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioural analysis of interventions. Implementation Science, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01001-2

Weiss, M., Bobay, K., Johantgen, M., & Shirey, M. (n.d.). Aligning Evidence-Based Practice With Translational Research: Aligning Evidence-Based Practice With Translational Research: Opportunities for Clinical Practice Research Opportunities for Clinical Practice Research. https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1606&context=nursing_fac

 

Also Check out: Describe the characteristics of performance-driven team

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table

Description:

Read “The Role of the Nurse in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety,” by Hickey and Giardina, from Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing(2019).

Reviewing the Literature: Essential First Step in Research, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice
Description:

Read “Reviewing the Literature: Essential First Step in Research, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice,” by Bernhofer, from Journal for Nurses in Professional Development (2015).

Clinical Preventive Services

Description:

Read “Clinical Preventive Services,” by Guerrero Ayres and Bradley, from Encyclopedia of Nursing Research (2017).

Reviewing the Literature

Description:

Read “Reviewing the Literature,” by Bryne, from Sage Research Methods’ Project Planner (2017).

How to Conduct a Literature Review

Description:

Read “How to Conduct a Literature Review,” by Watts, from Podiatry Review (2020).

Preventative Care Benefits for Adults

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table
NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table

Description:

Explore “Preventative Care Benefits for Adults,” located on the Healthcare.gov website.

My Healthfinder

Description:

Explore “My Healthfinder,” located on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website.

Healthy People 2030

Description:

Explore “Healthy People 2030,” located on the Healthy People 2030 website.

Health Communication and Health Information Technology

Description:

Read “Health Communication and Health Information Technology,” located on the HealthyPeople.gov website.

Using E-Health and Information Technology to Improve Health

Description:

Read, “Using E-Health and Information Technology to Improve Health,” located on the World Health Organization website.

Technology and the Future of Mental Health Treatment

Description:

Read “Technology and the Future of Mental Health Treatment,” located on the Mental Health Information page of the National Institute of Mental Health website.

Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (Protocol)
Description:

Read “Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (Protocol),” by Rouleau, Gagnon and Cote, from Systematic Reviews (2015).

Tasks

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-550 NUR-550-O503 Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature Table 150.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 100.0%
PICOT 5.0% The PICOT is omitted. NA NA NA The PICOT is clearly and accurately presented.

Setting and Sample 10.0% The setting and sample are omitted for one or more of the articles. The setting and sample are indicated for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. The setting and sample are indicated for each article. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. The setting and sample are adequately presented for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. The setting and sample in which the researcher conducted the study are detailed and accurate for each article. NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table

Research Question, Hypothesis, Purpose or Aim of Study 10.0% Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for one or more articles is omitted. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is presented, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is adequately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A discussion on the research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study is thoroughly and accurately presented for each article.

Methods 10.0% Method of study for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the methods of study are incomplete. The method of study is presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. The method of study for each article is presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies An adequate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented.

Analysis and Data Collection 10.0% Analysis and data collection for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the analysis and data collection are incomplete. Analysis and data collection are presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. Analysis and data collection for each article are presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. An adequate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the analysis and data collection for each article is presented.

Key Findings and Outcomes ten percent One or more articles’ outcomes and key findings have been omitted. Overall, the results and key findings are insufficient. For each article, outcomes and key findings are presented, but key information is consistently omitted. Throughout, there are inaccuracies. Each article’s outcomes and key findings are presented. One or two articles are missing key elements. There are a few minor errors. Each article includes a thorough discussion of its outcomes and key findings. Minor details are required for clarity or accuracy. For each article, a thorough and accurate discussion of the outcomes and key findings collection is provided.

Recommendations ten percent One or more of the articles lack researcher recommendations. The recommendations for three or more articles are either incorrect or incomplete. For each article, researcher recommendations are provided. Two of the articles’ researcher recommendations are incorrect or incomplete. Each article includes researcher recommendations. The researcher recommendations described in one article are either incorrect or incomplete. The researcher recommendations for each article are presented accurately. Minor details are required for clarity or accuracy. For each article, researcher recommendations are accurately and thoroughly described. NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Literature Evaluation Table

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Literature Evaluation Table Explanation of How Articles Aid in the Proposal of an Evidence-Based Practice Project ten percent For one or more of the articles, an explanation of how the article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is omitted. Three or more articles’ explanations are incorrect or incomplete. Each article is explained in terms of how it supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal. Two of the articles’ explanations are incorrect or incomplete. A general explanation is provided for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal. One article’s explanation is incorrect or incomplete. The evidence-based project proposal has widespread support. Each article is explained in terms of how it supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal. Minor details are required for clarity or accuracy. There is sufficient support for the evidence-based project proposal. Each article is explained in detail as to how it supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal. The evidence-based project proposal is clearly supported.

Writing Mechanics (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5% of the total Surface errors are so common that they impede meaning communication. Inappropriate wording or sentence structure is used. The reader is distracted by frequent and repetitive mechanical errors. There are inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice. The sentence structure is correct but unvarying. There are some mechanical errors or typos, but they are not distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure is used, as well as audience-appropriate language. Although there may be a few mechanical errors in the prose, they are minor. The author employs a number of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The author clearly understands standard written academic English.