NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent

Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1

Review the evidence-based practice project ideas you described in Topic 5 DQ 1. Based on your initial ideas, what types of scholarly nursing research (such as quantitative or qualitative research, peer-reviewed resources, etc.) would be required to further investigate the issue? Identify the criteria you would use to evaluate the appropriateness of the research. Why is it important to select research that meets these criteria?

Re: Topic 6 DQ 1

My evidenced-based project idea focuses on implementing a community education program that focuses on prevention in regard to stroke risk factors. When implementing any new program, it’s imperative to gather evidence and analyze how it can improve patient outcomes, health policies, service and programs as evidence allows for increased accountability (DeNisco & Barker, 2016). When gathering evidence for any project it’s important to understand different types of research and the different levels of evidence (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019). Evidence strength is dictated by three key characteristics, quality, quantity and consistency (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019). When selecting research for any topic it should be quality research that has results that are valid and not influenced by biases or occur by chance (art). Quantity can be evaluated by identified the number of studies on said topic, the size and population of the studies and the impact of the treatments (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019). Consistency is when results that are similar are found across a few different studies (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019).

When selecting research for my topic I would typically select research topics that are considered level on in the hierarchy of evidence. These are RCT, systematic review of an RCT and metanalysis if an RCT (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019). Under this topic I would likely consider including a mixture of quantitative and qualitative research. When working with prevention practices its important to understand how behavior plays a role in changing health practices and that why it’s important to analyze qualitative research in addition to quantitative.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent Reference

DeNisco, S. M., & Barker, A. M. (2016). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Glasofer, A., & Townsend, A. B. (2019). Determining the level of evidence. Nursing Critical Care, 14(6), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccn.0000580120.03118.1d

RESPOND  HERE (150 WORDS, 2 REFERENCES)

This is insightful Meagan, the implementation of the new research program requires collection and analysis of evidence to improve patient outcomes as well as increased accountability. Understanding different forms of research and levels of evidence are critical in enhancing the validity, reliability, and applicability of the research and evidence-based practice processes. When selecting the research process, it is necessary to consider the level of evidence. Levels of evidence, sometimes called the hierarchy of evidence, are always assigned to the studies on the basis of methodological quality of their validity, design, as well as applicability to patient care (Glasofer & Townsend, 2021). A combination of qualitative and quantitative research processes is always required to enhance the research processes’ effective outcomes. Quantitative research designs require adherence to the data collection and analysis processes. The quantitative approaches are necessary for ensuring the establishment of valid, reliable, as well as applicability of the research outcomes (Bansal et al., 2018). To select a viable research study process, it is necessary for the researcher to consider the hierarchy or level of evidence.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4004

Glasofer, A., & Townsend, A. B. (2021). Determining the level of evidence: experimental research appraisal. Nursing2021, 51(1), 60-63. https://journals.lww.com/nursing/Abstract/2021/01000/Determining_the_level_of_evidence__Experimental.15.aspx

Re: Topic 6 DQ 1

My idea from Topic 5 DQ 1 was workplace violence (WPV), and my initial topic was much too broad. Before finding the best current evidence, I need to identify a specific clinical problem to best search for an answerable question (DeNisco & Barker, 2016). Using the PICOT template: population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time, will help create that searchable question.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 

Population: Healthcare Workers

Intervention: Education and Training

Comparison: Workplace Violence

Outcome: Prevent or Minimize

Time: 1-year Period

The next step is searching. I recommend a good starting point in PubMed, mostly because articles are specific to nursing and many are free to access. My organization allows access to the commonly used databases such as the Cochran Library, CINAHL, Medline and is a benefit to avoid paying fees for full review articles.  GCU library also offers students access to these same resources.

After obtaining multiple sources of evidence, critical appraisal or grading evidence is next, from the strongest to weakest evidence (DeNisco & Barker, 2016). The gold standard and strongest evidence is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials or clinical guidelines based on systematic reviews. Evidence sources may include qualitative or quantitative studies, reviews or clinical expertise, or patient preferences and values. The need is to quickly determine whether it is valid evidence and applicable to practice. Critical appraisal tools exist and ask specific questions based on the methodology or design of the study you are evaluating. Besides validity and usefulness, other criteria to assess include when last updated, clinical context and environment, and patient values and preference. One of my personal favorites, UpToDate, uses a graded approach, 1A being strongest whereas, 2C means a weak recommendation to use an intervention based on both quality of the evidence and patient preference.

Inquiry and asking the best clinical question in a PICOT format is critical to searching and finding the best evidence. Appraising the evidence and integrating this with patient values and preferences is necessary to make evidence-based-practice decisions within nursing.  My Cochrane Library search resulted in very low-to low-quality evidence, with the common databases searched and seven studies being included. There is limited evidence that some interventions might reduce aggression toward healthcare workers (Spelten et al., 2020).  April is National WPV Month and a great place to start to recognize that more research is needed. I recognize I need more experience in this process too.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

DeNisco, S. M., & Barker, A. M. (2016). Advanced practice nursing: essential knowledge for the profession. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Spelten E;Thomas B;O’Meara PF;Maguire BJ;FitzGerald D;Begg SJ; (2020, April 29). Organizational interventions for preventing and minimizing aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32352565/.

RESPOND TO BARBARA HERE

This is insightful, Barbara, consideration of the PICOT question is necessary for undertaking different research processes (Abbade et al., 2016). Also, it is always necessary to identify the ideal sources of information such as databases that may be applied in supporting the research process. Most of the databases contain essential forms of information that may be applied in addressing various aspects of the project. CINAHL, Cochran Library, and Medline are some of the databases that can be applied to review some of the best sources of information that can be used to authenticate the information required in the research processes. The quality of research processes often depends on the levels of evidence (Glasofer & Townsend, 2019). The level of evidence is always assigned to the studies on the basis of methodological quality of their validity, design, as well as applicability to patient care. To better develop a quality, reliable, valid, and applicable research process, sticking to the PICOT question is necessary. In other words, different researchers need to consider the PICOT question in ensuring the achievement of quality outcomes.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

Abbade, L. P., Wang, M., Sriganesh, K., Mbuagbaw, L., & Thabane, L. (2016). Framing of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature. BMJ open, 6(11). https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e013175.short

Glasofer, A., & Townsend, A. B. (2019). Determining the level of evidence. Nursing Critical Care, 14(6), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccn.0000580120.03118.1d

GINA

Re: Topic 6 DQ 1

My evidence-based practice would be centered around the utilization of new technologies by bedside nurses. I would do a literature review of peer-reviewed studies to further investigate this issue. Then I would develop a framework and intervention with said technology that could be both quantitatively and qualitatively measured. Both quantitative and qualitative data would be important because it would be necessary to study the numerical data regarding technology use, and it would also be important to know both nurse and patient responses to interventions, which could be gathered through surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. When researching, data would have to be recent, within the last five years, peer-reviewed, with adequate sample sizes.

DeNisco and Barker say it best, “Not all evidence is created equal, and there is a need to use the best available evidence,” (2016, p.465). Peer-reviewed research is essential, because it helps maintain the quality of the research. Critical appraisals of research by other academic minds can both validate, provide transparency, ensure professionalism, academic integrity and ethically conducted research (Kelly, et al., 2014). Additionally, research should be recent. Just like the rest of the world, data ages and isn’t always applicable as people, the world, the population, and societies adapt and change. You want sources that reflect the newest and most up to date research available. And finally, data in research can be easily statistically manipulated, so sample sizes matter. If a sample size is too small, it often holds less statistical significance and cannot often be used to generalize to a population.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

DeNisco, S. M., & Barker, A. M. (2016). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Kelly, J., Sadeghieh, T., & Adeli, K. (2014). Peer review in scientific publications: Benefits, critiques, and a survival guide. EJIFCC, 25(3), 227–243. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975196/

RESPOND  HERE

This is insightful, Gina; in general, the application of technology is on the rise, which calls for increased research processes to enhance the understanding of different ways to integrate technological approaches in the research processes (Spelten et al., 2020). The utilization of technology by the bedside nurses is critical in ensuring quality treatment outcomes and patient safety. Usually, the integration of technology in the healthcare processes reduces the errors associated with general care. The literature review is essential in the study processes because it enhances the understanding of past research outcomes that may be applied in addressing some of the research processes’ aspects. In the research process, it is also necessary to consider qualitative and quantitative research approaches to enhance the achievement of valid, reliable, and applicable research processes (Bansal et al., 2018). While undertaking a literature review, it is necessary for the researcher to consider different databases that have authentic, reliable, and applicable sources of information that can be utilized in identifying the required information.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

Spelten E;Thomas B;O’Meara PF;Maguire BJ;FitzGerald D;Begg SJ; (2020, April 29). Organizational interventions for preventing and minimizing aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32352565/.

Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4004

My topic 5 Discussion Question covered the prevalence of UTI in a healthcare facility, more specifically in the elderly population who are not always able to make their needs known. Qualitative and quantitative research would be vital in decreasing the amount of UTI seen frequently in this population. Qualitative research would dig in to find out why these frequent UTIs occur and set forth interventions to help prevent or decrease the prevalence. The research article states: “Qualitative research empowers researchers to investigate the what, how and why of interventions in real-life setting. Qualitative research can play a critical and instrumental role in designing behavioural change strategies with high impact on practice. The results of this research were used to design a complex intervention informed by social marketing.” (Duane, 2016)

This article relates to my topic and the information is both appropriate and supported. There are several authors who share extensive research, and the article was found using Google Scholar through Grand Canyon University Library. The purpose is to inform the public of the need for qualitative research to find a solution of prevalent but preventable UTIs and to teach health care facilities and health care workers how to give a measure of quality care to resolve the problem.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent Reference

Duane, S., Domegan, C., Callan, A., Galvin, S., Cormican, M., Bennett, K., Murphy, A. W., & Vellinga, A. (2016). Using qualitative insights to change practice: exploring the culture of antibiotic prescribing and consumption for urinary tract infections. BMJ Open, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008894

The topic I discussed was about the completion of nighttime observation rounds in psychiatric facilities. At night, it is difficult for staff to complete these observation rounds because patients are sleeping and the lights are off, so flashlights must to used to visualize patients. Using lights to observe patients at night can disrupt patient sleep patterns, leading to worsening of mental health conditions. To further investigate this issue more clinical, qualitative, and peer reviewed research will need to be taken into account.  

There is a preliminary, qualitative research study that looked at the use of AI to assist nighttime observation rounding in the psychiatric setting (Barrera et al., 2021). The AI is a non-invasive sensor that is installed into patient rooms and can measure patients’ respirations and pulse with a live video feed (Barrera et al., 2021). Using technology like this can improve patients’ quality of sleep, experiences, and overall outcomes. Additionally, this technology can reduce the chance for human errors, or staff not completing observation rounds properly, which can improve patient safety as well.  

The CRAAP Test is an acronym to use when deciding whether an article is reliable and credible enough for an academic research paper. CRAAP stands for currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose (New Jersey Institute of Technology, 2022). It is important to select research articles that meet this criteria because it ensures the research is credible and unbiased. It is imperative for researchers to ensure articles do not fabricate data or have conflicts of interest. Not meeting the CRAAP standards may indicate that a research article should not be used in evidence-based papers or journals.  

The article I mentioned above meets the CRAAP Test standards. Currency: The article has been published and revised within the last five years. Relevance: The article is relevant to my topic of completing nighttime observation checks in psychiatric facilities. The intended audience of the research is healthcare professionals and developers who work in the mental health field. Authority: The authors of this study are researchers at an accredited and well-known university and the contact information for the lead researcher is included (Barrera et al., 2021). Additionally, the study uses 26 references and cites others in their field, and the study has been cited about 20 times by other researchers (Barrera et al., 2021). Accuracy: The information in this research came from a qualitative study and has been peer-reviewed and published in a credible academic journal (Barrera et al., 2021). Purpose: The purpose of this article was to inform others of the research findings and to encourage more research be conducted with AI in the psychiatric setting. There were also no conflicts of interest reported by the researchers and the point of view appears to be objective.  

References 

Barrera, A., Gee, C., Wood, A., Gibson, O., Bayley, D., & Geddes, D. (2021). Introducing artificial intelligence in acute psychiatric inpatient care: Qualitative study of its use to conduct nursing observations. Evidence Based Mental Health, 23(1), 34-38. http://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2019-300136 

New Jersey Institute of Technology. (2022). How to evaluate information sources. https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP 

REPLY 

Scholarly nursing research can involve quantitative research, qualitative research, and peer-reviewed sources. In the chosen evidence-based practice project ideas, health care in the prison system and environmental risk factors were highlighted as an area that needed improvement. Qualitative research is the method chosen to further discover this issue. Qualitative research cannot be measured but rather observed. This method of research is helpful for nurses because it enables the consideration of the situation in its context while interrelating with the patients and considering the differences on an individual basis (DeNisco & Barker, 2019). 

Solell and Smith (2019), describe a qualitative research study that investigated how US nurses experience barriers to providing person-centered care for those incarcerated individuals. The research was conducted by analyzing nurses’ perceptions and experiences in the prison system. Data was collected through an online survey tool. Open-ended and demographic questions were used through a convenience sample of 78 nurses. Solell and Smith (2019) concluded that research shows nurse-patient-centered barriers are with the incarceration environment and security.  

The Currency Relevance Authority Accuracy Purpose (CRAAP) is a study tool used to appraise information sources (New Jersey Institute of Technology, 2022). The article falls under the CRAAP criteria because it is current (less than five years old), the publication date is clear, and the links are functional. This article is relevant since the information included pertains to the topic discussed and is clear and concise directing the reader to the main points, objectives, and answers to the questions. The authority of the authors is direct, and their references contain plenty of journal articles. Accuracy is established since this article has been peer-reviewed, submitted, and then published. The article is supported by evidence. The purpose of the article is to inform the audience yet provides other viewpoints. The intentions and purposes are clear and defined. 

It is key to select research that has been scrutinized to avoid biased material, and discredited information, and identify websites that are not credible sources (New Jersey Institute of Technology, 2022). The CRAAP standard of judging sources assists the researcher in avoiding material that has not been validated. The internet can be very helpful with instant information; however, this can also lead to information that lacks authority, currency, relevance to the topic, accurate information, and purpose. 

References 

DeNisco, S.M., & Barker, A.M. (Eds.). (2019). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge 

        for the profession (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN-13:9781284176124 

New Jersey Institute of Technology. (2022, June 9). https://researchguides.njit.edu New Jersey 

Institute of Technology: https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP 

Solell, P., & Smith, K. (2019). If we truly cared’: understanding barriers to person-centered nursing in correctional facilities. International Practice Development Journal, 9(2), 1–16. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.19043/ipdj.92.007 

REPLY 

The evidence-based practice idea that I talked about for the topic discussion concerns post operative delirium. To further investigate the topic, experimental clinical research through controlled clinical trails can pave the way for evidence-based improvement of this issue. Collecting information through observational studies represents a stepping stone into descriptive and analytical studies. These two types of studies provide determinants of specific factors associated with the issues introducing possible hypotheses needed as well as the actual testing of the hypotheses utilizing statistical data. These studies fall under population research and include things such as health, disease and injuries. Case studies and expert opinions can also contribute significantly to this topic. Case study comparisons can reveal similarities and differences associated with the problem and experts that specialize in the diagnosis can weigh in on the problem and shed some light on risk factors, reasons, biological causative factors and implementation of the best intervention options (DeNisco, 2019). 

I found an article that talks about recent advances that have been made in the prevention and management in postoperative delirium. The criteria I would use based on the CRAAP (stands for currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose) test is as follows: The article is current and is three years old, the source meets my research needs creating a window into up-to-date information regarding prevention and management of the problem, both authors are from a department of anesthesiology within reputable universities, information within the source is accurate with more than 80 citations, and the purpose of the article is informative and has multiple viewpoints within (Vlisides, 2019). 

The CRAAP criteria for this particular article helps to ensure the research is up to date being published within the last the last 5 years, whether or not the source is relevant to the issue I am researching, investigating the authors of the research and any affiliations that may create self-fulfilling intentions, if the research can be verified by multiple resources, and what is the purpose of the research and is there any other viewpoints included. 

It is important to select research that meets these criteria to evaluate the reliability and trustworthiness of sources. This ensures that misinformation is not spread and that you keep your name reputable. Utilization of the CRAAP test builds up competence to recognize problematic information and levels up critical thinking skills related to advanced research. 

Citations 

DeNisco, S. M., & Barker, A. M. (Eds.). (2019). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN-13: 9781284176124 

Vlisides, P., & Avidan, M. (2019). Recent advances in preventing and managing postoperative delirium. F1000Research, 8, F1000 Faculty Rev-607. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16780.1 

REPLY 

The topic that I used in topic five is preventing falls in the geriatric population. Older adults are at higher risk for falls, which can be a significant burden. However, falls can be preventable (Injury Prevention and Control, 2020). Qualitative research is best for my topic because it will allow me to focus on participant observation of one group. The group that I will focus on is older adults, which will help me to analyze the group and find the possible cause that increases the risk of falls and how to prevent them (Aspers et al., 2019. pp 139-160).

The article I will use is Chronic health conditions as a risk factor for falls among the community-dwelling US older adults: A zero-inflated regression modeling approach. This article meets the criteria according to CRAAP, which is currency (C): the information has been revised and updated, and the link still works. Relevance (R): the article’s information relates to the topic I want to discuss. The intended audience is the medical field community and professors educating new incoming medical students on the awareness of falls. Therefore, I feel comfortable using this article in my research paper. Authority (A): The author is Yoshita Paliwal,1 Patricia W. Slattum,1, and Scott M. Ratliff. The publisher information is in the article. Accuracy (A) The article has references and evidence related to the topic of fall prevention. The information for this article has been reviewed. There is no bias in this article. This article’s purpose (P) is to prevent falls in older adults by assessing chronic health problems and educating about preventable fall sources. The information is a fact based on research and evidence. To ensure reliable research information, my research must meet the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) criteria. 

References 

Aspers, P., Corte, U.(2019). What is qualitative research?. Qual Sociol 42, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7 

Injury Prevention and Control. (2020, December 16). Retrieved from centers for disease control: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/features/older-adult-falls/index.html 

Paliwal, Y., Slattum, P. W., & Ratliff, S. M. (2017). Chronic health conditions as a risk factor for falls among the community-dwelling US older adults: a zero-inflated regression modeling approach. BioMed Research International, 2017, 1–9. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1155/2017/5146378 

How to Evaluate Information Sources. (2022, September 8). Retrieved from New Jersey Institute of Technology: https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP 

REPLY

what an interesting and needful area of research. Fall prevention has become a very serious issue in the elderly population. Qualitative research allows observation rather than numbered measurement as you stated, “Qualitative research will allow you to focus on participant observation of one group.” DeNisco and Barker (2019) further state that this type of research is profitable to the nurse because they can see the situation in its context. In order to analyze the how’s and why’s of falls in the elderly population, the nurse needs to be able to observe the risks and causes. Utilizing The Currency Relevance Authority Accuracy Purpose (CRAAP) screening method will assist in the discovery of relevant information which will be helpful in understanding what the latest prevention tools are. 

References 

DeNisco, S.M., & Barker, A.M. (Eds.). (2019). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge 

        for the profession (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN-13:9781284176124 

REPLY 

older adults, are indeed vulnerable to falls. Therefore, healthcare stakeholders spend a significant budget on preventing the aged population from falling and treating the other complications associated with these falls. Some older adults may need a reliable support system to lessen their risks of falling. Nursing research provides reliable information that can be used to prevent and mitigate falls among the aged population (Allobaney et al., 2020). Qualitative research is suitable for handling falls in healthcare facilities. The research design focuses on participant observation of one group. The focus allows nurses to get reliable information for critical decision-making. 

Similarly, different peer-reviewed articles can be integrated into qualitative research to improve the quality of the outcome (Lee et al., 2020). There are different materials that nurses can use in nursing research. Unfortunately, some materials may be less significant and inaccurate. Therefore, nurses should be keen when choosing research designs and sources of information. Meeting the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) criteria confirms the credibility of scholarly nursing research.  

  References 

Allobaney, N. F., Nashwan, A. J., & Mohamed, A. S. (2020). Nursing Research during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. Open Journal of Nursing, 10(10), 952-959. DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2020.1010066  

Lee, J. Y., Lee, S., & Oh, E. G. (2020). Conceptualization of person-centered care in Korean nursing literature: A scoping review. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 32(4), 354-363. 10.7475/kjan.2020.32.4.354 

Week 6 DQ 1 

The idea on the previous topic was on the prevention of hospital acquired infections and the topic is broad because of the presence of infections such as CLABSI, CAUTI and many others. Before identifying suitable evidence, it is important to identify a specific clinical problem so that there is an answerable question. A technique such as the use of the PICOT system will help in the development of a searchable question (McClinton, 2022). Searching for the resources for the study would involve the sues of various databases such as PubMed, these are all provided for by Grand Canyon University in their online library. 

After acquiring various resources that are associated with Hospital Acquired Infections, critical appraisal of the evidence is important to help in determining the strongest evidence. Mata analysis of random controlled trials and clinical based guidelines is the recommendable gold standard in getting the strongest form of evidence. The various sources of evidence many include qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews or clinical expertise or patient preferences and values. Qualitative and quantitative data will provide facts and figures relating to the issue being assessed, the reviews will also help in looking at previous studies relating to the issue and patient preferences will also help in getting the views of the patients concerning the issue (Grove and Gray, 2018). All these factors play an important role in efforts of reducing infections and therefore there will be no preference on the type of research that will be used. What is important is determining the validity and applicability of the evidence that has been obtained. 

Developing the PICOT question is important because it will help in searching and finding the most suitable evidence. Evidence appraisal and integration with patient values and preference is important in evidence-based practice implementation in nursing. Additionally, research needs to be recent the world and society has undergone many changes and data from the previous ages may not be applicable. 

References. 

Grove, S. K., & Gray, J. R. (2018). Understanding nursing research e-book: Building an evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences. 

McClinton, T. D. (2022). A guided search: Formulating a picot from assigned areas of inquiry. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12598 

The evidence-based project practice involved improving the approach of care delivery in the clinical nurse specialist practice using the holistic nursing theory. Continuous quality improvement process requires critical review and analysis of the nursing scholarly research and developing up-to-date and effective practice interventions. Reviewing quantitative research and peer-reviewed journals is required to further investigate the issue of poor patients’ outcomes in the clinical nursing specialist practice. Such researches provide reliable and credible evidence to support the causative factors to the existence of the issue and based on the report, proper recommendations can be developed to improve the nursing practice.

Various factors are considered in evaluating the appropriateness of a research. First, the research must have employed an appropriate study design and recruited sufficient sample population (Claydon, 2015). For example, the sample population characteristics must represent the true features and experiences of the general population. Enough and appropriate sample population is required to produce credible and reliable research findings. Additionally, the study must have a clear data analysis tool and statistical tests. Randomized control trials are preferred in the clinical research because they present strong evidence to support causality or the existence of a given phenomenon among the populations of interest (Ten Ham-Baloyi & Jordan, 2016).

Selecting an appropriate research is important for evidence-based nursing practice recommendation. The checklists help in ensuring that the conclusion derived from the research is reliable and can be inferred to the general population. Poor choice of the research may lead to misinterpretation of the existing clinical problems; therefore, it may be impossible to fully address the issue because of the lack of sufficient scholarly evidence. Furthermore, the research ought to be based on the targeted population characteristics to be relevant.

References

Claydon, L. S. (2015). Rigour in quantitative research. Nursing Standard, 29(47), 43.

Ten Ham-Baloyi, W., & Jordan, P. (2016). Systematic review as a research method in postgraduate nursing education. Health Sa Gesondheid, 21(1), 120-128.