NSG 6435 iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive Perceptual Problems in Children

Sample Answer for NSG 6435 iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive Perceptual Problems in Children Included After Question

NSG 6435 iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive Perceptual Problems in Children

NSG 6435 iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive Perceptual Problems in Children

This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered. For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned.
To support your work, use your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.
Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for this assignment by the end of the week.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NSG 6435 iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive Perceptual Problems in Children:


For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study based on the course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases emphasize core learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing assessments and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.
The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic way to enhance your learning. Material from the iHuman cases may be present in the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam.
Click here for information on how to access and navigate iHuman.
This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Timothy Adams V3 PC”.
Apply information from the iHuman Case Study to answer the following questions:
What do you believe is your best course of action for this appointment?
What clinical or historical findings will indicate the need for diagnostic studies and why? Which diagnostic studies will you initially order and why?
What would be three differentials in this case?
Submission Details:
Post your initial response to the Discussion Area by Saturday. Respond to at least two posts by the end of the week, Wednesday. Week starts on Thursday and ends on the following Wednesday.
Your initial post is due on Saturday.
Your two peer responses are due no later than Wednesday. The expectation is that you reply to your peers on more than 2 days before Wednesday to receive full credit.
Please make sure you are using scholarly references and should not be older than 5 years. Your posts/references must be in APA format.
Please follow the discussion rubric to make sure you have addressed the discussion criteria.

Human Moodle Rubric

CriteriaExemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Subjective – 40%Determined by iHuman 40 pointsDetermined by iHuman 36 pointsDetermined by iHuman 32 pointsDetermined by iHuman 0 points40
Objective – 25%Determined by iHuman 25 pointsDetermined by iHuman 22 pointsDetermined by iHuman 20 pointsDetermined by iHuman 0 points25
Objective – 5% (Testing)Determined by iHuman 5 pointsDetermined by iHuman 4 pointsDetermined by iHuman 3 pointsDetermined by iHuman 0 points5
Assessment–5%Three differential diagnoses are supported by findings and include worst-case scenario.

Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources.

5 points
Three differential diagnoses include worst-case scenario, but one diagnosis might not be fully supported by findings.

Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources.

3 points
Differential diagnoses may or may not include worst-case scenario, and two differential diagnoses are not supported by findings.

Rationale for all differential diagnoses not provided by scholarly resources.

1 points
Fewer than three differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings and do not include worst-case scenario.

Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses.

0 points
5
Plan–25%Comprehensive plan includes all components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Appropriate and current guidelines cited.

25 points
Plan missing one of the identified components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Appropriate and current guidelines cited.

17 points
Plan missing two of the identified components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Guidelines are not current or appropriate for identified problem.

9 points
Plan missing more than three of the identified components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Guidelines for plan not cited.

0 points
25
Total Points100

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NSG 6435 iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive Perceptual Problems in Children

Title: NSG 6435 iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive Perceptual Problems in Children

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.