NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips

Sample Answer for NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips Included After Question

NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips

NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips

This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered .For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned .

To support your work, use your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library .As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format .

Online Nursing Essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible .Respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings .Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion .Cite resources in your responses to other classmates .Complete your participation for this assignment by the end of the week .

For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study based on the course objectives and weekly content .The iHuman cases emphasize core learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum .Throughout your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing assessments and diagnostic skills, and to develop patient care plans that are grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice .

The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic way to enhance your learning .Material from the iHuman cases may be present in the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam .

Click here for information on how to access and navigate iHuman .

This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Sonya Phillips” .

After completing your iHuman Case Study, answer the following questions using the latest evidenced based guidelines:

Discuss the questions that would be important to include when interviewing a patient with this issue .

Describe the clinical findings that may be present in a patient with this issue .

Are there any diagnostic studies that should be ordered on this patient? Why?

List the primary diagnosis and three differential diagnoses for this patient .Explain your reasoning for each .

Discuss your management plan for this patient, including pharmacologic therapies, tests, patient education, referrals, and follow-ups .

Human Moodle Rubric

CriteriaExemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Subjective – 40%Determined by iHuman 40 pointsDetermined by iHuman 36 pointsDetermined by iHuman 32 pointsDetermined by iHuman 0 points40
Objective – 25%Determined by iHuman 25 pointsDetermined by iHuman 22 pointsDetermined by iHuman 20 pointsDetermined by iHuman 0 points25
Objective – 5% (Testing)Determined by iHuman 5 pointsDetermined by iHuman 4 pointsDetermined by iHuman 3 pointsDetermined by iHuman 0 points5
Assessment–5%Three differential diagnoses are supported by findings and include worst-case scenario.

Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources.

5 points
Three differential diagnoses include worst-case scenario, but one diagnosis might not be fully supported by findings.

Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources.

3 points
Differential diagnoses may or may not include worst-case scenario, and two differential diagnoses are not supported by findings.

Rationale for all differential diagnoses not provided by scholarly resources.

1 points
Fewer than three differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings and do not include worst-case scenario.

Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses.

0 points
5
Plan–25%Comprehensive plan includes all components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Appropriate and current guidelines cited.

25 points
Plan missing one of the identified components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Appropriate and current guidelines cited.

17 points
Plan missing two of the identified components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Guidelines are not current or appropriate for identified problem.

9 points
Plan missing more than three of the identified components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Guidelines for plan not cited.

0 points
25
Total Points100

A Sample Answer for the Assignment: NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips

Title: NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.