NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips

South University NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the South University NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips                         

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the South University NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips                       

The introduction for the South University NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips                         

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips Included After Question

This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered .For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned .

To support your work, use your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library .As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format .

Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible .Respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings .Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion .Cite resources in your responses to other classmates .Complete your participation for this assignment by the end of the week .

For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study based on the course objectives and weekly content .The iHuman cases emphasize core learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum .Throughout your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing assessments and diagnostic skills, and to develop patient care plans that are grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice .

The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic way to enhance your learning .Material from the iHuman cases may be present in the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam .

Click here for information on how to access and navigate iHuman .

This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Sonya Phillips” .

After completing your iHuman Case Study, answer the following questions using the latest evidenced based guidelines:

Discuss the questions that would be important to include when interviewing a patient with this issue .

Describe the clinical findings that may be present in a patient with this issue .

Are there any diagnostic studies that should be ordered on this patient? Why?

List the primary diagnosis and three differential diagnoses for this patient .Explain your reasoning for each .

Discuss your management plan for this patient, including pharmacologic therapies, tests, patient education, referrals, and follow-ups .

Human Moodle Rubric

Criteria	Exemplary Exceeds Expectations	Advanced Meets Expectations	Intermediate Needs Improvement	Novice Inadequate	Total Points
Subjective – 40%	Determined by iHuman 40 points	Determined by iHuman 36 points	Determined by iHuman 32 points	Determined by iHuman 0 points	40
Objective – 25%	Determined by iHuman 25 points	Determined by iHuman 22 points	Determined by iHuman 20 points	Determined by iHuman 0 points	25
Objective – 5% (Testing)	Determined by iHuman 5 points	Determined by iHuman 4 points	Determined by iHuman 3 points	Determined by iHuman 0 points	5
Assessment–5%	Three differential diagnoses are supported by findings and include worst-case scenario. Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources. 5 points	Three differential diagnoses include worst-case scenario, but one diagnosis might not be fully supported by findings. Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources. 3 points	Differential diagnoses may or may not include worst-case scenario, and two differential diagnoses are not supported by findings. Rationale for all differential diagnoses not provided by scholarly resources. 1 points	Fewer than three differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings and do not include worst-case scenario. Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses. 0 points	5
Plan–25%	Comprehensive plan includes all components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Appropriate and current guidelines cited. 25 points	Plan missing one of the identified components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Appropriate and current guidelines cited. 17 points	Plan missing two of the identified components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Guidelines are not current or appropriate for identified problem. 9 points	Plan missing more than three of the identified components: Diagnostic testing Pharmacologic intervention Non-pharmacologic intervention Referrals Patient education Follow-up Guidelines for plan not cited. 0 points	25
Total Points					100

A Sample Answer for the Assignment: NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips

Title: NSG 6330 Week 6 Discussion – iHuman Case Study – Sonya Phillips