NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University

Wilkes University NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Wilkes University NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University                         

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Wilkes University NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University                       

The introduction for the Wilkes University NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University                         

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NSG 604 Module IV: Discussion 1 Wilkes University assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Locate a published study utilizing one of the four descriptive study designs. Summarize the study and its findings for us. Do you feel this was an effective method for studying the topic of interest? Why or why not? Share a visual representation of the study results (one of the tables in the article) with us and explain it. Do you feel this was the best way to share the study results? Why or why not?

When you respond to your classmates, let them know if you agree or disagree and why. 

Post your initial response by Wednesday at 11:59 PM EST. Respond to two students by Saturday at 11:59 PM EST. The initial discussion post and discussion responses occur on three different calendar days of each electronic week. All responses should be a minimum of 300 words, scholarly written, APA formatted (with some exceptions due to limitations in the D2L editor), and referenced.  A minimum of 2 references are required (other than the course textbook). These are not the complete guidelines for participating in discussions. Please refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion found in the Course Resources module. 

In April 2020, Japan limited the amount of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing used to detect COVID-19, even though there This upsurge caused worry that the Japanese government may have misjudged the disease’s epidemiology. To determine the prevalence of people with COVID-19, in April 2020, Doi et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional study in Kobe City with a population of 1,518,870. A cross-sectional study employs observational studies that analyze data from a population at a single point in time (Wang & Cheng, 2020). Kobe City, located in the center of Japan, was an ideal place to test for COVID-19.

In a prior study, Doi et al. (2020) attempted to find the prevalence of the number of people in Japan infected with SARS-CoV-2. Results indicated that of 1,000 samples, 33 were positive. The problem with that study is Doi et al. (2020) used immunoglobulin G (IgG) serology assays for test samples. Serology assays at that time were not particularly sensitive, meaning they could not always determine the disease from test samples. Since then, serology assays have become more sensitive and specific. In addition, for this present study, Doi et al. (2020) used two serology assays manufactured by different pharmaceuticals: Kurabo and Abbott.

Participants for the study were patients who attended an outpatient clinic in Kobo City between May 26 to June 7, 2020. The researchers obtained 1,000 test samples categorized by sex and decade of birth of the participants.

Results indicated that tests using the Kurabo assays produced 18 positives for SARS-CoV-2 antibody out of 1,000 samples, and Abbot assays produced two positives for SARS-CoV-2 antibody out of 1,000. Only two test samples had positive results with both Kurabo and Abbot assays, and 16 uncounted test samples had errors.

Table 1 – Sample characteristics.

Ages	Male	Test positive (Kurabo)	Test positive (Abbott)	Female	Test positive (Kurabo)	Test positive (Abbott)
Under 10-year-old	5	0	0	5	0	0
10–19	8	0	0	11	0	0
20–29	19	0	0	37	2	0
30–39	53	2	0	73	1	0
40–49	75	2	0	75	0	0
50–59	75	2	0	75	1	1
60–69	75	4	0	75	2	0
70–79	76	0	0	76	1	1
80–89	75	1	0	75	0	0
Over 90	18	0	0	19	0	0
Total	479	11	0	521	7	2

Doi et al. (2020) suspect the Kurabo assays produced several false positives, and the Abbot assays were more sensitive and specific. Compared to Doi et al. (2020) prior study prevalence of COVID-19 was much lower. The researchers suspect that COVID-19 prevalence is much higher in Kobe City than the results showed. They suspect there are probably many people undiagnosed.

At the time of this study, countries were scrambling to understand COVID-19. Although Doi et al. (2020) admit that their results were likely off, it is an effort to try and find the prevalence of COVID-19 in Kobe City, Japan. Moreover, Doi et al. (2020) research most likely helped future efforts with COVID-19 research in Japan.

Reference

Doi, A., Iwata, K., Kuroda, H., Hasuike, T., Nasu, S., Nishioka, H., Tomii, K., Morimoto, T., &   Kihara, Y. (2021). A cross-sectional follow up study to estimate seroprevalence of  coronavirus disease 2019 in Kobe, Japan. Medicine 100(48), e28066.

Wang, X. & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and  recommendations. Chest, 158(1S), S65-S71.

The study design I chose was a cross-sectional study. The research in question was to examine the effect of income disparities in the United States on influenza vaccination coverage.  The total participants were 138,679 and they used a 2014-2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) of self-reported adults. The research was for whether the participants received the influenza vaccine in the last 12 months as well as their family income. They used multivariable logistic regression to obtain odd ratios. The overall key finding was that adults in lower-income-level categories had decreased odds of being given the influenza vaccine compared to adults with a total family income of greater than $100,000.  They concluded that lower income adults should be considered a health priority for increasing vaccination coverage (Gaskin et al., 2023).

The study represented the targeted population as they were using the income as the exposure variable. They used the federal poverty level (FPL) to classify the income levels. They had inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection of the population, which is a strength in the study. The data was collected by an in-person survey. This can introduce reporting bias as adults could alter their incomes. The survey was administered by in-person surveys through a series of questionnaires. The study specified that they used trained interviewers, therefore, reducing interviewer bias. The study adjusted the income with the logistic model of regression to adjust bias due to confounding. I feel like they focused on the exposure variable, which was the income disparities in this case, the study represented their target well.

Table 1.

In this table we can appreciate that the income was divided in 5 categories, and they used the logistic regression model to adjust confounding bias. The patients had received the vaccination in the previous 12 months and the age of the population survey was between 18 and 65 years old, with more females than males. The race difference is notable as the participants were not in the same baseline, on the other hand it is understandable as they were interested in the family income. Most participants had a level of education. The geographic location was unequal as they surveyed more participants in the South and most participants were unemployed.  This may have been maybe because the young participants were in college, or the older participants were retired.

In conclusion, I believe that the evidence presented in this study is good and has good external validity. There are other many factors influencing vaccinations that we have discussed in the class already. The annual average cost of influenza to healthcare is approximately $11.2 billion (Putri et al., 2023). This is alarming as providers we must help to alleviate these disparities in health care to improve the cost of care.

References

Gaskin, C. M., Woods, D. R., Ghosh, S., Watson, S., & Huber, L. R. (2023). the effect of income disparities on influenza vaccination coverage in the United States. Public health reports, 138(1), 85–90. https://doi-org.wilkes.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/00333549211069190

Putri, W. C. W. S., Muscatello, D. J., Stockwell, M. S., & Newall, A. T. (2018). Economic burden of seasonal influenza in the United States. Vaccine, 36(27), 3960–3966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.057