Sample Answer for NRS 455 CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Part 2 Included After Question

Assessment Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

Collaborate with your group from Topic 2 to develop a presentation using your instructor-approved article on a specific intervention or new treatment tool for the management of diabetes in the aging/elderly population or children. The article must be published within the last 5 years and relevant to nursing practice.

Create a 12-15-slide PowerPoint presentation (not including the title and references slides) on the study’s findings and how they can be used by nurses as an intervention. Include speaker notes for each slide and additional slides for the title page and references.

Include the following:

1. Describe, using the PICO(T) question format, the specific population and intervention or treatment tool used in the article.
2. Summarize the PICO(T) outcome evaluated by your selected article. The research presented must include pathophysiological findings that are current, thorough, and relevant to nursing practice.
3. Provide a description of how the treatment tool or intervention can be integrated into nursing practice. Provide evidence to support your discussion. Reflect how the treatment tool or intervention will affect nursing practice and the disease process.
4. Explain why psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects are important to consider for the patient population which your article reviews. Describe how support can be offered in these respective areas as part of a plan of care for the patient. Provide examples.
5. You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 2.3, 2.5, 4.1, and 4.2.

CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Part 2 – Rubric

LISTGRIDPRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total130 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Insufficient	3. Approaching	4. Acceptable	5. Target
Article	0 pointsCurrent article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is not present.	9.75 pointsCurrent article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is incomplete or incorrect.	10.27 pointsCurrent article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is present lacks detail.	11.57 pointsCurrent article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is detailed.	13 pointsCurrent article relevant to nursing practice with focus on specific intervention or treatment tool for diabetes management in adults or children is thorough and uses the PICOT method.
Intervention or Treatment Tool	0 pointsDescription of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is not present.	14.63 pointsDescription of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is incomplete or incorrect.	15.41 pointsDescription of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is present but lacks detail.	17.36 pointsDescription of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is detailed.	19.5 pointsDescription of the specific population and intervention and treatment tool used in the article is thorough.
Summary of Article	0 pointsSummary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is not present.	9.75 pointsSummary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is incomplete or incorrect.	10.27 pointsSummary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is present but lacks detail.	11.57 pointsSummary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is detailed.	13 pointsSummary of the PICOT outcome reviewed by the article, including pathophysiological findings that are current and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice, is thorough.
Treatment Tool or Intervention Integration	0 pointsDescription of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is not present.	19.5 pointsDescription of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is incomplete or incorrect.	20.54 pointsDescription of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is present but lacks detail.	23.14 pointsDescription of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is detailed.	26 pointsDescription of integration of treatment tool or intervention into nursing practice, including evidentiary support and effect on nursing practice and disease process, is thorough.
Psychological, Cultural, and Spiritual Aspects	0 pointsExplanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is not present.	14.63 pointsExplanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is incomplete or incorrect.	15.41 pointsExplanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is present but lacks detail or examples.	17.36 pointsExplanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is detailed and provides examples.	19.5 pointsExplanation of the importance of psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects for a patient population and how support can be offered in these areas as part of a plan of care is thorough and provides examples.
Presentation of Content	0 pointsThe content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.	9.75 pointsThe content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.	10.27 pointsThe presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.	11.57 pointsThe content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources.	13 pointsThe content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout	0 pointsThe layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.	4.88 pointsThe layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.	5.14 pointsThe layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.	5.79 pointsThe layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.	6.5 pointsThe layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience AwarenessIncludes sentence construction, word choice, etc.	0 pointsInappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.	4.88 pointsSome distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.	5.14 pointsLanguage is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.	5.79 pointsThe writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.	6.5 pointsThe writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of WritingIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.	0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.	4.88 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.	5.14 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.	5.79 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.	6.5 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/DocumentationUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.	0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.	4.88 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.	5.14 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.	5.79 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.	6.5 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.

A Sample Answer for the Assignment: NRS 455 CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Part 2

Title: NRS 455 CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes Part 2