NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation

Grand Canyon University NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation                         

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Online Nursing Essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

How to Write the Body for NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation Included After Question

Assessment Description

Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.). Assess the readiness of the health care organization or network you chose in regard to meeting the health care needs of citizens in the next decade.

Prepare a 1,000-1,250 word paper that presents your assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness. Include the following:

  1. Describe the health care organization or network.
  2. Describe the organization’s overall readiness based on your findings.
  3. Prepare a strategic plan to address issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.
  4. Identify any current or potential issues within the organizational culture and discuss how these issues may affect aspects of the strategic plan.
  5. Propose a theory or model that could be used to support implementation of the strategic plan for this organization. Explain why this theory or model is best.

ou are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation

Title: NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation

Healthcare organizations encounter multiple challenges in management of public health and delivery of quality care services to patients and diverse health populations. Imperatively, they must develop organizational cultures and creates strategic plans that will help them navigate the ever-transforming healthcare sectors and make informed decisions on the best practices, interventions, and approaches to take to improve overall care quality and attain patient satisfaction (Dearing, 2018). The purpose of this paper is to present an assessment of Kaiser Permanente as one of the leading health networks in the country and propose a strategic plan that will ensure its readiness in meeting the health care needs of American citizens in the next ten years.

Description of Kaiser Permanente

Kaiser Permanente was established in 1945 and considered one of the leading non-for-profit health entity in the United States. According to its website, the organization operates in eight states and the District of Columbia (D.C) and serves over 13 million individuals or members. The organization provides holistic or total care for its members and patients guided by their personal Permanente Medical Group that comprises of physicians, specialists, and teams of caregivers across its different facilities (Kaiser Permanente, 2022). The organization asserts that its medical and caring teams are empowered and get support from leading technological advances in health industry and tools that allow them to promote health, develop programs for disease prevention, offer state-of-the-art care delivery, and world-leading management of chronic diseases.

Kaiser Permanente is dedicated to care innovations, clinical research, health education and health equity as well as improving community health. With a mission focuses on provision of high-quality, affordable care and improvement of health of its members and the communities that it serves, Kaiser Permanente health system is one that closes the critical gap in service provision for millions of Americans that it serves across the nation. Kaiser Permanente employs over 211,000 experts and healthcare providers in its 39 hospitals and over 380 medical units and offices (Kaiser Permanente, 2022b). The organization has conducted over 4,000 research studies to help it meet the needs of its members and the communities that it serves.

Readiness to Meet Needs of its Members, Patients and Communities

Kaiser Permanente is one of the leading health care organizations that conducts several research studies on a host of issues that impact communities and health populations. The organization’s main focus areas include prevention and primary health, health education and care management, especially for chronic conditions. The organization’s focus on chronic conditions through its programs on cardiovascular diseases and cancer, hypertension and diabetes have led to a significant reduction of mortality among patients served and allowed communities to embrace primary health interventions to reduce their susceptibility and chances of getting such conditions (Kaiser Permanente, 2020; Cooke, 2018). Further, the organization is dedicated to the care of its members and communities’ needs through focusing on social and environment issues that create barriers to healthcare services’ access with the aim of attaining positive health outcomes. The organization shows its readiness in management of chronic conditions through its holistic programs that comprise of state-of-the-art treatment, specialized interventions, and ongoing monitoring to assist individuals live well.

Kaiser Permanente is one of the healthcare systems that conducts a progressive Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) every three years through collection of data that includes online surveys and public data to identity existing health needs of its members and the communities that it serves. The information provides the systems with data and robust partnerships to develop improvement goals and implement changes required in the community (Kaiser Permanente, 2022). The report also offers data on the required investment and planning designed to support economic opportunities within the community.

The economic needs of members and communities served by Kaiser Permanente are essential as they allow them to have resources to access health insurance and services. consequently, Kaiser Permanente partners with different organizations in the community, public health advocates, leaders, and governments at local, state, and even federal levels to ensure that these communities have economic endeavors and activities (Kaiser Permanente, 2020). Further, Kaiser partners with these entities to incorporate values, considerations and improve the health status among the different communities and develop policies on a host of health issues. Kaiser Permanente has always issued reports on the different ways to deal with social and economic determinants of health.

Strategic Plan on Network Growth, Nurse Staffing, Resource Management and Patient Satisfaction

The demand for healthcare will continue to rise due to an aging population and increased prevalence of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases like the Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) as well as occurrence of natural disasters and public health emergencies (Helbig, 2018). Therefore, Kaiser Permanente should focus on expansion of its network, ensure that it has adequate nurse staffing levels and optimal management of its resources and improving patient satisfaction.

Expansion of the network and increasing the influence of the organization on the American healthcare and the communities it serves should one of its core goals. Imperatively, Kaiser Permanente should continue to develop partnerships with other providers, communities and government agencies while expanding its research efforts. The organization should focus on a multidisciplinary approach in management of public health issues, and leverage the increased use of technologies like telemedicine and telehealth to reach rural populations (Cooke, 2018). Based on its research studies, it should expand its network through collaborations with physician offices and recognizing the critical role that nurses play in healthcare provision.

The issue of low staffing levels is likely to occur and the organizations should develop strategies like increased recruitment and retention, especially of new nurses, education of new staff members and supporting their efforts to advance their education (Dearing, 2018). The organization can develop a program where it targets nursing students at different levels to ensure that it has sufficient nursing staff levels. The management of resources, including human resources, in the organization requires effective models that focus on optimization and cost reduction approaches to offer quality services as it expands. The organization can enhance patient satisfaction through increased levels of nursing staff who will offer quality care services, especially preventive and primary care approaches through patient and community education and health awareness to manage chronic conditions like diabetes and hypertension.

Potential Issues in Organizational Culture and Effects on Strategic Plan

Overcrowding in emergency rooms and long waiting time can have an effect on the strategic plan leading to reduce levels of patient satisfaction and experience. Such issues leas to negative outcomes that include potential complications and increased cost of care for patients due to the added need for testing and prolonged stays in hospitals. Staffing shortage can be the main cause of such issues as witnessed in California where over 4,000 mental health employees of Kaiser Permanente went on strike (Klivans & Leitsinger, 2019). The implication is that many affected patients had adverse outcomes and complications due to delayed mental health treatment because of the strike and the high nurse-to-patient ratios. Some of the implications of this delay include potential relapse, increased morbidity and mortality.

Kaiser Permanente can deal with these issues through increased nursing numbers and leveraging technology through implementation of telemedicine and telehealth for its mental health patients. Using technology increases the ability of the organization to offer quality services to many patients in different settings, right from its inpatient to its outpatient as well as those at home with chronic conditions. The use of technology reduces the cost of care, leads to efficiency and effectiveness of the system and lowers admissions, transfers and readmissions while allowing patient to have self-care management and interventions to improve their overall health outcomes.

Assessment Description

Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.). Assess the readiness of the health care organization or network you chose in regard to meeting the health care needs of citizens in the next decade.

Prepare a 1,000-1,250 word paper that presents your assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness. Include the following:

  1. Describe the health care organization or network.
  2. Describe the organization’s overall readiness based on your findings.
  3. Prepare a strategic plan to address issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.
  4. Identify any current or potential issues within the organizational culture and discuss how these issues may affect aspects of the strategic plan.
  5. Propose a theory or model that could be used to support implementation of the strategic plan for this organization. Explain why this theory or model is best.

ou are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation

Title: NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation

Nurse leaders and nurse managers are important in nursing because they have a major influence
in reengineering of health care. “They act as change agents by developing strategies for quality
improvement” (Helbig, 2018). They are the ones that see the trends in patient care in their
organizations and propose to implement a change if it’s needed. In addition to reshaping the care
delivery, it would also enhance an organization’s culture (Thew, 2018). This is not only limited
to quality care and safety for patients but for the nursing staff also. They make sure the workflow
conditions are smooth, the staff is well educated with the latest practices, and the morale of the
unit is appropropriate. Strong nurse leaders and managers will be proactive leaders and empower
other nurses (Thew, 2018). They are the biggest advocates for nurses. Without the influence of
nurse leaders and managers, nurses today would not have the voice to help make changes in the
standards of the nursing profession or the respect it deserves.

References

Helbig, J. (2018). Reengineering Health Care Management. Nursing Leadership & Management:
Leading and Serving. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs451vn/nursing-leadership-and –
management-leading-and-serving/v1.1/#/chapter/5

Thew, J. (2018). 3 ways nurse leaders influence change in healthcare. Retrieved from
https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nursing/3-ways-nurse-leaders-influence-change-healthcare

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation

Title: NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation

Hi Dorothy,
According to Bell, “the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted more than ever how important strong
leadership is for the nursing profession. The pandemic forced the nursing profession to respond
to a rapidly changing and increasingly complex healthcare environment.”

All of this change does have a silver lining. “The pandemic served as a catalyst for change and
innovation as nurse leaders from all levels of nursing responded to the new challenges presented
by COVID-19,” said Bell.
In order to accommodate the increased demands of managing patient care during the pandemic,
“nurse leaders [across all levels of the profession] created new models of care and new
workflows using technology such as videoconferencing and telemedicine to communicate with
patients and with other healthcare workers. They also identified ways to prevent shortages from
the overuse of scarce resources such as personal protective equipment (PPE). ” Bell said.
Now that the pandemic appears to be turning a corner, the innovations created by nurse leaders
across the healthcare setting will endure, helping to advance the profession as we move into the
future.www.snhu.edu/…/health/what-is-nurse-leadership

Criteria Description

Health Care Organization or Network

5. Excellent

27 points

Health care organization or network is clearly and accurately described.

4. Good

22.95 points

Health care organization or network is described. Some detail is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Health care organization or network is summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies related to the representation of the organization or network.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Health care organization or network is partially presented. There are significant omissions and inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health care organization or network is not described.

Criteria Description

Assessment of Overall Organizational Readiness

5. Excellent

27 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described in detail. Degree of organizational readiness is established. Strong evidence and rationale support the assessment.

4. Good

22.95 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described. Degree of organizational readiness is generally established. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is summarized. Degree of organizational readiness is partially established. More information, rationale, and support are needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is partially presented. There are significant omissions. Degree of organizational readiness is not established.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is omitted.

Criteria Description

Strategic Plan

5. Excellent

36 points

The strategic plan is well developed. Network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction are addressed in detail. The plan is supported with strong evidence and rationale.

4. Good

30.6 points

The strategic plan addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.

3. Satisfactory

27 points

The strategic plan generally addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. More information, rationale, and support are needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

23.4 points

Strategic plan is partially presented. Plan contains major omissions. The plan fails to address issues outlined in the assignment criteria.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Strategic plan is omitted.

Criteria Description

Identification of Current or Potential Issues in Organizational Culture and Impact of These to Strategic Plan

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are clearly identified. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is thoroughly described and supported with evidence and rationale.

4. Good

22.95 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the potential impact of these on the strategic plan are discussed. Some evidence or rationale is needed.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are generally discussed. The impact of these on the strategic plan is summarized. Evidence and rationale are needed to support claims.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are partially summarized. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is unclear. There are omissions and inaccuracies throughout.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the impact of these to strategic plan are omitted.

Criteria Description

Theory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan

5. Excellent

27 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates strong support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. Compelling rationale supports why the theory or model is the best choice.

4. Good

22.95 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. General rationale is provided for why the theory or model is the best choice.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates some support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. It is unclear why this theory or model is the best choice. More information is needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is partially described. It is unclear how the theory or model would support implementation of strategic plan for the organization.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is omitted.

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

9 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

7.65 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

6.75 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.85 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

9 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

7.65 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

6.75 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.85 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

9 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

7.65 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

6.75 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.85 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

3.6 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

3.06 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

2.7 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.34 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

5.4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

4.59 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

4.05 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.51 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 180 points

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.