NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis

The loss of a loved one is very distressing to the family of the deceased, but most people don’t think about the fact that it is distressing to the nurses that cared for them as well. Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses spend the most time with their patients and their families due to nurse-patient ratio assignments. As a result, they are the ones who will most likely need to be educated on bereavement when it comes to dealing with end-of-life cases. As a matter of fact, many ICU nurses report feeling underprepared to give the families the appropriate support when needed, especially during the event of sudden death of a patient (Shariff, Olson, Santos Salas, & Cranley, 2017). According to Shariff et al., nurses who frequently deal with death and dying face psychological, emotional, and physical consequences as a result (2017). A similar experience occurred for me not too long ago, I lost my grandfather while he was in the ICU and the nurse caring for him was not very good at comforting my family and I. This was not a big issue for me being in the field and knowing how busy it can be to be there for us the entire time. However, a physician assistant that was present at the time of my grandfather’s death made a difference. He was very emotionally supportive and that made a big impact on the whole experience. As a nurse, I was in the shoes of those families who experienced the death of a close relative, and it made me realize how important it is for us to seek education about dealing with grief, both for our own sake, and the patient families’ sake.

References

Shariff, A., Olson, J., Santos Salas, A., & Cranley, L. (2017). Nurses’ experiences of providing care to bereaved families who experience unexpected death in intensive care units: A narrative overview. Canadian Journal of Critical Care Nursing, 28(1), 21-29. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&sid=5bf75750-99d0-45f2-9fc9-86160e09dd3f%40sessionmgr4009

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines Quality of life (QoL) as a person’s view of their situation in life in the perspective of the culture and value systems where they live, and with regard to their expectations, goals, standards, and concerns (Sarwar et al., 2019). It is the physical and mental health that a person perceives over time. QoL is further defined as how a person is healthy, comfortable, and able to engage in or take pleasure in life events. The term QoL is innately ambiguous since it can refer to an individual’s experience of their life and the living conditions in which people find themselves (Sarwar et al., 2019). The purpose of this assignment is to describe the defining attributes of QoL, the antecedent and consequence, create a model case, and theoretically apply the concept.

Three Defining Attributes

The three defining attributes of QoL are: A feeling of satisfaction with one’s life generally; A satisfactory state of physical, emotional, social, and mental health as established by the person referred to; The mental ability to establish one’s own life as satisfactory (Van Leeuwen et al., 2019). For example, for a person to say they have a good QoL, they need to be satisfied with their overall life. Besides, they should be satisfied with their physical, emotional, social, and mental health. They should be satisfied with their body’s physiological performance to have balance and harmony with themselves and others. They should also have a positive self-esteem and body image and positive and productive social interactions, personal relationships, and social support (Van Leeuwen et al., 2019). Lastly, a person with a good QoL exhibits the mental ability to assess their life as satisfactory.

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet my deadline

Antecedent and Consequence of The Concept

An antecedent is not necessarily a causative factor, but it is important for the concept to occur and can contribute to its cause. An antecedent of QoL is an individual’s ability to make a decision (Haraldstad et al., 2019). An individual may feel that it is important to get on with life. However, the decision often depends on the limitations their QoL imposes, such as physical activity and socialization levels. Individuals evaluate their lives and make decisions, which can sometimes improve or worsen their QoL (Haraldstad et al., 2019). On the other hand, consequences refer to factors that follow the occurrence. A consequence of QoL is acceptance of one’s circumstances. The results of a positive QoL are coping, adaptation, and satisfaction with life (Haraldstad et al., 2019). However, the results of a negative QoL are a lack of satisfaction and risk-taking behavior beyond that of a person’s age.

Model Case

A model case is an example of the use of a concept that shows all of its defining attributes. The following is a model case for QoL: A 32-year-old man gets home from work one evening. As he parks his SUV in the parking lot next to his wife’s car, his two children, 5-year-old and 3-year-old, run and scream with joy to welcome him home. He can also see his wife smiling and waving at him at the door. The children hug him and help him carry some snacks he brought for them. When he gets to the house, his wife hugs and welcomes him and offers him a cup of tea. He sits and tells himself, “I have the life I was dreaming of; there is nothing I wish to change.” He reflects on how lucky he is to have a happy family, a successful business, good health, and supportive friends. Many people look upon him and wish their life was a fraction of his.

The model case demonstrates the quality of life. The three defining attributes are presented in the case. The man has an overall sense of happiness and satisfaction with his life. He has the mental ability to evaluate his life. Besides, he feels he is in good health since he can do the things he wishes to. Furthermore, other people also assess her life be of quality.

Theoretical Applications of the Concept

Peplau’s nursing theory applies to the concept of QoL. QoL is entrenched in Peplau’s theory as an indefinable, extensive phenomenon. Peplau considers QoL as a subjective view of the condition of an individual’s life, which is equal to a person’s wellbeing and psychological wellness and often connected with health (Hagerty et al., 2018). A relationship is fundamental in Peplau’s theory, whereas QoL is considered a by-product of the relationship and thus significant to the theory. Peplau proposed that QoL is mostly a subjective perception and varies with changing conditions; (time and situation-dependent) (Hagerty et al., 2018). Nonetheless, QoL is considered an intangible quality in the theory.

Reflection

QoL concept applies to advanced nursing practice (APN) since APRNs must understand that QoL is the degree to which individuals enjoy a good life. Besides, APRNs should understand that a person enjoys a good life when they attain a balance in their relations with themselves and others by creating and maintaining adequate conditions and personal potentials over the life course. QoL, without a doubt, is relevant to APN practice. Patients often consult NP on how to achieve the best possible QoL for themselves or their loved ones. For an NP to help these patients and their families, they must themselves reflect on what is meant by QOL.

NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis References

Hagerty, T. A., Samuels, W., Norcini-Pala, A., & Gigliotti, E. (2018). Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations: An Alternate Factor Structure for Patient Experience Data?. Nursing science quarterly, 30(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318417693286

Haraldstad, K., Wahl, A., Andenæs, R., Andersen, J. R., Andersen, M. H., Beisland, E., … & Helseth, S. (2019). A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Quality of life Research, 28(10), 2641-2650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02214-9

Sarwar, S., Aleem, A., & Nadeem, M. A. (2019). Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and its correlation with academic performance of medical students. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 35(1), 266–270. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.1.147

Van Leeuwen, K. M., Van Loon, M. S., Van Nes, F. A., Bosmans, J. E., De Vet, H. C., Ket, J. C., … & Ostelo, R. W. (2019). What does quality of life mean to older adults? A thematic synthesis. PloS one, 14(3), e0213263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213263

Concept Analysis Template

Name:

Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept:

The selected nursing concept for this analysis is compassion. Compassion is a durable concept that is largely used in nursing and healthcare. It has behavioral and emotional elements that influence the actions of nurses in their practice. Compassion is among the crucial elements and determinants of quality nursing care. Compassion has several definitions. For example, the Oxford dictionary defines it as sympathetic concern and pity for one’s suffering. The term also refers to the empathizing with a person who is suffering or harmed. It also refers to the feeling of being aware of another person’s suffering coupled with the intention to help them overcome the suffering (Tierney et al., 2019; Younas & Maddigan, 2019). Other authors have also defined it as a basic human kindness with deep awareness of others suffering coupled with the effort or wish to relieve it (Tierney et al., 2019).

Three defining attributes:

Compassion has several attributes. They include the authentic presence, noticing sufferings of others, and showing empathy towards the suffering. It is also the connectedness that nurses have with the suffering, engaging emotionally with others, and being motivated to assist or support others overcome their challenges. Compassion also has the attribute of seeking to empower the vulnerable to overcome their health problems, negotiating how to prevent or alleviate suffering, and using knowledge and skills to prevent, alleviate, or manage distress or suffering (Galetz, 2019).

1 Antecedent and 1 Consequence of the concept:

One antecedent of compassion is respect. Nurses must demonstrate respect to others for them to understand their sufferings or experiences. The respect helps them to understand the problem from the patient’s perspective and how to address it better. Respect also helps nurses to identify ethical practices that they can use to enhance the patient outcomes (Younas & Maddigan, 2019).

One consequence of compassion is trust between patient and the nurse. Compassionate care increases the trust that patients have towards the care given by the nurses. It also strengthens the professional relationship among them, which result in additional outcomes such as patient satisfaction, empowerment, and adherence to treatment plans. The strengthened trust also eliminates or reduces fear that patients could have towards healthcare systems and interventions (Younas & Maddigan, 2019). Therefore, patients are empowered to take responsibility for their health, hence, the realization of optimum outcomes in the care process.

Model Case:

A model case of compassion is a nurse involved in the care of a patient with terminal illness. The nurse must implement patient-centered interventions to promote peaceful death in such a patient. In this case, the nurse must demonstrate compassion by understanding the unique experiences of the patient, his or her sufferings, and attempt to implement interventions to minimize them. For example, the nurse administers analgesics to minimize pain in end of life care for patient’s psychological comfort and wellbeing.

Theoretical Applications of the Concept:

Dorothea Orem’s theory of self-care utilizes the concept of compassion. Accordingly, nurses must understand the experiences of their patients for them to assist the patients meet their needs. For example, nurses caring for a cancer patient understand the chronic pain that patients experience and implement interventions to reduce their suffering (Tierney et al., 2019).

Reflection:

I always apply the concept of compassion in my nursing practice. I always strive to understand what a disease means to the patient and explore evidence-based interventions to enhance treatment outcomes. I also go an extra mile to see that the additional factors that do not relate to the disease are addressed for optimum recovery. I also apply compassion by ensuring that the decisions that I make do not predispose patients to any unintended harm. Therefore, compassion is part of my professional practice.

NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis References

Galetz, E. (2019). The empathy-compassion matrix: Using a comparison concept analysis to identify care components. Nursing Forum, 54(3), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12353

Tierney, S., Bivins, R., & Seers, K. (2019). Compassion in nursing: Solution or stereotype? Nursing Inquiry, 26(1), e12271. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12271

Younas, A., & Maddigan, J. (2019). Proposing a policy framework for nursing education for fostering compassion in nursing students: A critical review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(8), 1621–1636. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13946

NR501NP-10808 Week 3: Concept Analysis

Week 3: Concept Analysis

Due Jan 29 by 11:59pm Points 175 Submitting a file upload

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete an analysis of a concept found in the nurse practitioner role supported by a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

CO 1: Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO 2, 5)

CO 4: Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and the application to advanced nursing practice. (PO 1)

Compassion Fatigue: Concept Analysis

Introduction

In nursing theory development, concept analysis plays a critical role, as they constitute scientific knowledge. Concepts also make up variables which can be measured or explained within a particular theory. In this paper, the analysis of compassion fatigue as a concept is critical in understanding the theory of care. Nursing theories influence the nursing profession in many ways and shape how nurses serve in their practice. They provide guidance and knowledge useful for individuals in the nursing profession. Similarly, theories provide a model that helps define and support the nursing practice, auspicious solutions for nursing problems or issues, and promote the quality of care patients receive. The theory of human caring by Watson is applicable to the nursing practice, particularly in helping nurses foreclose as regards compassion fatigue. This theory argues for the creation of a caring and loving relationship between the patient and the nurse (Pajnkihar, Štiglic, & Vrbnjak, 2017). The existence of such a relationship requires the nurse to exhibit empathy, compassion, and be authentically present in the course of providing care. This theory is useful in promoting the welfare of the nurses and patients as nurses who care about their own welfare tend to more likely promote the welfare of others. To provide the best care, nurses must possess a healthy body, spirit, and mind (Clark, 2016). The intention of this paper is to dig into the phenomenon of compassion fatigue in connection to the theory by Watson. The paper also provides recommendations for nurses in forestalling and managing compassion fatigue. First, compassion fatigue is defined and explained in connection with the theory. This is achieved in the definition and literature review sections. The paper then analyzes the attributes of compassion fatigue and look at its antecedents and consequences. The paper also analyzes the empirical referents, which are the objective ways in which compassion fatigue can be measured. Next, the paper presents three cases, one of which is a model case and two others, a borderline case and a contrasting case. The next section addresses the theoretical applications of compassion fatigue in relation to the theory. Finally, a conclusion is provided, which is a summary of the findings and a description of the link between compassion fatigue and Watson’s nursing theory.

Definition/Explanation of the Compassion Fatigue

Patients have numerous physical, spiritual, and emotional demands. Nurses working in emergency departments, hospice, pediatrics, oncology, family care, mental health, and public health might experience stress associated with patients’ death, trauma, suffering, and/or their chronic disease. If nurses do not manage these stressful demands, they could develop compassion fatigue. At times, nurses provide too much compassionate care of others that they forget to address their own needs (Nolte, Downing, Temane, & Hastings-Tolsma, 2017). People who choose the nursing profession do so knowing that they will be required to provide compassionate care to individuals with critical spiritual, emotional, mental, and physical needs. Nevertheless, nurses may experience stress when the needs of patients are exceedingly overwhelming.

Compassion fatigue denotes depletion in various needs linked to care provided to patients with considerable physical suffering and emotional instability. It refers to a distinctive type of burnout that people experience in the course of giving care. Professionals who are likely to experience compassion fatigue include those working in the emergency room, those who provide care for cancer patients, and first responders. The phenomenon is characterized by a personal experience of pain in the course of providing empathetic support to patients or their families (Nolte et al., 2017). This condition is common among nurses with weak communication and interpersonal skills. Self-assessment can significantly help nurses identify stressors that contribute to compassion fatigue.

Due Date:

Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 3. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

When the assignment is placed in the dropbox, it will automatically be submitted to Turnitin. You may submit the assignment one additional time before the due date to lower the Turnitin score. If you choose to resubmit, the second submission will be considered final and subject to grading. Once the due date for the assignment passes, you may not resubmit to lower a Turnitin score.

Total Points Possible: 175

Requirements:

Description of the Assignment

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of one concept that is important and useful to the nurse practitioner role.  The concept for this assignment must be supported by a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application as demonstrated through the creation of a model case. Theoretical applications of the concept are also discussed. Non-nursing theories may not be used. Scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is not allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance. Please note: the concepts of caring or cultural humility are not permitted for this assignment.

Adaptation

Burnout

Civility

Comfort

Compassion

Compassion fatigue

Competence

Empowerment

Engagement

Health

Leadership

Meaningfulness

Modeling

Noise

Pain

Quality of life

Resilience

Self-care

Sensory overload

Situational awareness

Criteria for Content

Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section only)

Support from nursing literature is required.

2. Defining attributes:

A minimum of three (3) attributes are required.

Support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation:  An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept.  For this question, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.

Antecedent and Consequence

1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.

1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.

Support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation:  An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that happens before an event. An antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept. A consequence follows or is the result of an event.  The selected consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.

4. Model Case

1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

Definition

All identified attributes

Theoretical Applications of the Concept

Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

Support from nursing literature is required.

Reflection

Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.

Self-reflection may be written in first-person.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The worksheet should be typed, double spaced, and written in complete sentences. (Concept Analysis Worksheet)Links to an external site.

Reference page and in-text citations must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.

The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing Non-nursing theories may not be used.

A minimum of 4 (four) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may not be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is not counted as one of the 4 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Please note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

Week 3: Steps of Concept Analysis

Hello Professor and Classmates

I chose pain as my concept analysis

Definition of pain

Pain is defined in the OED as (a) the sensation which one feels when hurt (in body or mind); (b) suffering, distress, the opposite of pleasure; (c) in specifically physical and psychical senses: bodily suffering; mental suffering, trouble, grief, sorrow; (d) trouble as taken for the accomplishment of something difficult.

Defining attributes is to list the characteristics that are associated with a concept. Any concept analysis will consist of more than one defining attribute; however, one needs to determine which attributes are appropriate for the purpose of exploration of the concept (Walker & Avant, 1995).

Based on this principle, the critical attributes of the concept of pain include: (a) unpleasant and distressful experiences originating from physical sensation and having both positive and negative meanings for an individual; (b) an individual human experience; (c) a state of feeling in both sensation and emotion (verbal), and behavioral components;

Description of one antecedent and one consequence of the concept

Antecedents are the events or incidents that happen before the existing concept (Walker & Avant, 1995).

personal values act as antecedents related to the concept of pain. The personal issue includes the individual’s current-physical and emotional condition, personality, gender and socio-economic class. Consequences are the events or incidents that happen as results of the concept (Walker & Avant, 1995).

The consequences of pain are related to pain reaction and the individual’s own interpretation of the meaning of pain (Bueno-Gómez, 2017). Pain reaction has a more physical and biological focus; coping with pain.

Identification of one empirical referent

Empirical references present how the concept is to be measured or what the observation of a phenomenon should in reality be. It is the event that demonstrates the existence of the concept.

Measuring pain should include the location, intensity and quality of the pain. Behavioral cues are used to assess patients’ pain and include crying, restlessness or avoidance of movement, and alterations in muscle tone (Bueno-Gómez, 2017).

Brief explanation of theoretical applications of the concept (how is the concept relevant to a nursing theory.

As a nurse practitioner pain assessment will be used daily when assessing, treating, and checking outcomes of patient care. Pain is relevant to Jean Watson’s Caring theory. Pain is subjective so understanding how to measure pain and how to treat each patient will be a unique. Person, environment, health, and nursing will definitely affect how pain is perceived by the patient, treated, and resolved.

Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2010). Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Boston, MA: Pearson.

pain. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/pain (Links to an external site.)

Bueno-Gómez, N. (2017). Conceptualizing suffering and pain. Philosophy, Ethics, And Humanities In Medicine: PEHM, 12(1), 7. doi:10.1186/s13010-017-0049-5

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category

Points

Description

Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY)

Support from nursing literature is required.

Defining Attributes

A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.

Support from nursing literature is required

Antecedent & Consequence

1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.

1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.

Support from nursing literature is required

Model Case

1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

Definition

All identified attributes

NP perspective

Theoretical Applications of the Concept

Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

Support from nursing literature is required.

Reflection

Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.

Self-reflection may be written in first-person.

Total CONTENT Points= [145 pts]

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT

Category

Points

Description

Paper Specifications

A nursing theory was used.

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.

Minimum of 4 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

APA Format (current edition)

References must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.

One deduction for each type of APA style error

Citations in Text

Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.

Writing Mechanics

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual.

Total FORMAT Points= [30 pts]

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 175 points

NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis

Three Defining Attributes

Antecedent and Consequence of The Concept

Model Case

Theoretical Applications of the Concept

Reflection

NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis References

Concept Analysis Template

Name:

Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept:

Three defining attributes:

1 Antecedent and 1 Consequence of the concept:

Model Case:

Theoretical Applications of the Concept:

Reflection:

NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis References

Galetz, E. (2019). The empathy-compassion matrix: Using a comparison concept analysis to identify care components. Nursing Forum, 54(3), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12353

Tierney, S., Bivins, R., & Seers, K. (2019). Compassion in nursing: Solution or stereotype? Nursing Inquiry, 26(1), e12271. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12271

NR501NP-10808 Week 3: Concept Analysis

Week 3: Concept Analysis

Due Jan 29 by 11:59pm Points 175 Submitting a file upload

Purpose

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

CO 1: Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO 2, 5)

CO 4: Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and the application to advanced nursing practice. (PO 1)

Compassion Fatigue: Concept Analysis

Introduction

Definition/Explanation of the Compassion Fatigue

Due Date:

Total Points Possible: 175

Requirements:

Description of the Assignment

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Adaptation

Burnout

Civility

Comfort

Compassion

Compassion fatigue

Competence

Empowerment

Engagement

Health

Leadership

Meaningfulness

Modeling

Noise

Pain

Quality of life

Resilience

Self-care

Sensory overload

Situational awareness

Criteria for Content

Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section only)

Support from nursing literature is required.

2. Defining attributes:

A minimum of three (3) attributes are required.

Support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation:  An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept.  For this question, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.

Antecedent and Consequence

1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.

1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.

Support from nursing literature is required.

4. Model Case

1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

Definition

All identified attributes

Theoretical Applications of the Concept

Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

Support from nursing literature is required.

Reflection

Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.

Self-reflection may be written in first-person.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The worksheet should be typed, double spaced, and written in complete sentences. (Concept Analysis Worksheet)Links to an external site.

Reference page and in-text citations must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.

The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing Non-nursing theories may not be used.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Please note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

Week 3: Steps of Concept Analysis

Hello Professor and Classmates

I chose pain as my concept analysis

Definition of pain

Description of one antecedent and one consequence of the concept

Antecedents are the events or incidents that happen before the existing concept (Walker & Avant, 1995).

Identification of one empirical referent

Empirical references present how the concept is to be measured or what the observation of a phenomenon should in reality be. It is the event that demonstrates the existence of the concept.

Brief explanation of theoretical applications of the concept (how is the concept relevant to a nursing theory.

Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2010). Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Boston, MA: Pearson.

pain. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/pain (Links to an external site.)

Bueno-Gómez, N. (2017). Conceptualizing suffering and pain. Philosophy, Ethics, And Humanities In Medicine: PEHM, 12(1), 7. doi:10.1186/s13010-017-0049-5

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category

Points

Description

Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY)

Support from nursing literature is required.

Defining Attributes

A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.

Support from nursing literature is required

Antecedent & Consequence

1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.

1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.

Support from nursing literature is required

Model Case

1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

Definition

All identified attributes

NP perspective

Theoretical Applications of the Concept

Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

Support from nursing literature is required.

Reflection

Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.

Self-reflection may be written in first-person.

Total CONTENT Points= [145 pts]

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT

Category

Points

Description

Paper Specifications

A nursing theory was used.

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.

Minimum of 4 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

APA Format (current edition)

References must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.

One deduction for each type of APA style error

Citations in Text

Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.

Writing Mechanics

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual.

Total FORMAT Points= [30 pts]

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 175 points

Rubric

NR501NP WK3_Concept Analysis_MAR20

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of Selected Concept

20 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.

18 pts

Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.

16 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited support from scholarly sources.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefining Attributes

25 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes Support from scholarly sources provided.

23 pts

Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Support from scholarly sources provided.

21 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Limited support from scholarly sources provided.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAntecedent & Consequence

25 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

23 pts

Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

21 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly literature was provided.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Applications of the Concept

25 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

23 pts

Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

21 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specifications

A nursing theory was used.

Minimum of 4 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

10 pts

Excellent

All critical elements present.

9 pts

Good

3 critical elements present.

8 pts

Satisfactory

2 critical elements present.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

1 critical element present.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 critical elements present.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style

APA Guidelines as per the current edition of the manual are:

– demonstrated for the citations and the reference page

– there is a reference for every in-text citation and visa versa.

-One deduction for each type of APA format error.

15 pts

Excellent

0 to 1 APA error was present.

13 pts

Good

2 – 3 APA errors were present.

12 pts

Satisfactory

4 – 5 APA were are present.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

6 – 7 APA were are present.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

8 or greater APA errors were present.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality

5 pts

Excellent

This section included all of the required elements.

4 pts

Good

This section included three of the required elements.

3 pts

Satisfactory

This section included only two of the required elements.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

This section included only one of the required elements.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

This section included none of the required elements.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Total Points: 175

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 6, but no more than 8 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6^th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.
A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.
References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance. Please note: the concepts of incivility and civility are not allowed for this assignment.

· Adaptation

· Burnout

· Caring

· Comfort

· Compassion

· Compassion fatigue

· Competence

· Cultural humility

· Empowerment

· Engagement

· Health

· Leadership

· Meaningfulness

· Modeling

· Noise

· Pain

· Palliative care

· Quality of life

· Resilience

· Self-care

· Sensory overload

· Situational awareness

NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Directions and Assignment Criteria

Assignment Criteria	Points	%	Description
Introduction	10	4	The introduction substantively presents all the following elements: · Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. · Identifies the selected nursing concept. · Identifies the nursing theory that addresses the selected concept. · Names the sections of the paper. · Scholarly support is required.
Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept	25	10	This section includes: · Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). · A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
Literature Review	35	14	This section requires: · A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept. · Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion. · Support from nursing literature is required.
Defining Attributes	25	10	For this section: · A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required. · A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required
Antecedent & Consequence	25	10	This section requires the identification of: · 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. · 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. · A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Empirical Referents	20	8	This section requires the identification of: · 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. · A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Construct Cases	30	12	This section requires: · 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: o Definition o All identified attributes · 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. · 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
Theoretical Applications of the Concept	30	12	This section requires: · Discussion of the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. · Explanation on how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. · A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Conclusion	10	4	This section requires: · Summarization of key information regarding: · Selected nursing concept. · Selected nursing theory. · Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing (specific to selected specialty track professional role and/or area of practice). · The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)
Paper Specifications	20	8	A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. Paper meets length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
APA Format (6^th edition)	10	4	Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6^th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. One deduction for each type of APA style error
Citations in Text	5	2	Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.
Writing Mechanics	5	2	Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual.
Total	250	100 %	A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria	Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance	Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance	Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance	Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance	Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance
Content Possible Points = 230 Points
Introduction	10 Points	9 Points	8 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Introduction	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.	Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
Definition/ Explanation of Selected Concept	25 Points	22 Points	20 Points	10 Points	0 Points
Definition/ Explanation of Selected Concept	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited support from scholarly sources.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.
Literature Review	35 Points	31 Points	28 Points	13 Points	0 Points
Literature Review	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in a disorganized fashion.
Defining Attributes	25 Points	22 Points	20 Points	10 Points	0 Points
Defining Attributes	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes Support from scholarly sources provided.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Support from scholarly sources provided.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Limited support from scholarly sources provided.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.
Antecedent & Consequence	25 Points	22 Points	20 Points	10 Points	0 Points
Antecedent & Consequence	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly literature was provided.
Empirical Referents	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	8 Points	0 Points
Empirical Referents	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.
Construct Cases	30 Points	26 Points	24 Points	11 Points	0 Points
Construct Cases	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
Theoretical Applications of the Concept	30 Points	26 Points	24 Points	11 Points	0 Points
Theoretical Applications of the Concept	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Conclusion	10 Points	9 Points	8 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Conclusion	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.	Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
Paper Specifications	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	8 Points	0 Points
Paper Specifications	This section included all of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.	This section included three of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.	This section included only two of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.	This section included only one of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.	This section included none of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
		Content Subtotal			_____of 230 points
Format Possible Points = 20 Points
APA Style	10 Points	9 Points	8 Points	4 Points	0 Points
APA Style	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric 2 – 3 APA errors were present	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA were are present	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA were are present	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present
Citations	5 Points	4 Points	3 Points	2 Points	0 Points
Citations	There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.	There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.	There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge	There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric	There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
Writing Quality	5 Points	4 Points	3 Points	2 Points	0 Points
Writing Quality	1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual	3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual	5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual	7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual	9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual

Format Subtotal	_____of 20 points
Total Points	_____of 250 points
Comments: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

Rubric

NR501NP WK3_Concept Analysis_MAR20

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of Selected Concept

20 pts

Excellent

18 pts

Good

16 pts

Satisfactory

10 pts

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefining Attributes

25 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes Support from scholarly sources provided.

23 pts

Good

21 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Limited support from scholarly sources provided.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAntecedent & Consequence

25 pts

Excellent

23 pts

Good

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No reflection included

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specifications

A nursing theory was used.

Minimum of 4 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

10 pts

Excellent

All critical elements present.

9 pts

Good

3 critical elements present.

8 pts

Satisfactory

2 critical elements present.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

1 critical element present.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 critical elements present.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style

APA Guidelines as per the current edition of the manual are:

– demonstrated for the citations and the reference page

– there is a reference for every in-text citation and visa versa.

-One deduction for each type of APA format error.

15 pts

Excellent

0 to 1 APA error was present.

13 pts

Good

2 – 3 APA errors were present.

12 pts

Satisfactory

4 – 5 APA were are present.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

6 – 7 APA were are present.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

8 or greater APA errors were present.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality

5 pts

Excellent

This section included all of the required elements.

4 pts

Good

This section included three of the required elements.

3 pts

Satisfactory

This section included only two of the required elements.

2 pts

Needs Improvement

This section included only one of the required elements.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 6, but no more than 8 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6^th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.
A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.
References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

Wow! What a horrible way to start out as a new nurse. Unfortunately, I have had several nurses tell me similar stories of not having adequate training which negatively impacted the lives of their patients. While I have never worked in the hospital as an RN, I worked on a med-surge floor as an LPN while attending RN school. This was at a small local hospital back between 2005-2007. I got plenty of on-the-job training and was not put out on my own until I felt comfortable doing so. I always had another LPN and an RN charge nurse working with me, so if I got into a situation I felt uncomfortable with, one of them would usually help me. I always felt very comfortable with my job responsibilities except for when they called a code. Thank God I had a great nursing supervisor who helped lead the code and we got most of these patients back. I can’t imagine working as a new nurse during the pandemic when the nursing shortage was horrible and people were dying left and right. It sounds like as a new grad, you were basically thrown out to the wolves and I’m very sorry you had to endure that. It sounds like in that situation that you were using empirics and going with your gut feeling that something was wrong with this patient. It’s just very sad that as a new grad, they chose not to listen to you and a 40-year-old woman had to lose her life because of poor nursing judgment on your preceptor’s part. I hope that things are better at the hospital now that the pandemic is hopefully over and that you never have to endure that situation again. I also hope that as a future nurse practitioner, you continue to use Carpers personal knowledge and be empathetic towards not only patients but new nurses as well that need your direction. You can be an active participant and use your story to help others in their nursing careers.

· Adaptation

· Burnout

· Caring

· Comfort

· Compassion

· Compassion fatigue

· Competence

· Cultural humility

· Empowerment

· Engagement

· Health

· Leadership

· Meaningfulness

· Modeling

· Noise

· Pain

· Palliative care

· Quality of life

· Resilience

· Self-care

· Sensory overload

· Situational awareness

NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Directions and Assignment Criteria

Assignment Criteria	Points	%	Description
Introduction	10	4	The introduction substantively presents all the following elements: · Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. · Identifies the selected nursing concept. · Identifies the nursing theory that addresses the selected concept. · Names the sections of the paper. · Scholarly support is required.
Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept	25	10	This section includes: · Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). · A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
Literature Review	35	14	This section requires: · A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept. · Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion. · Support from nursing literature is required.
Defining Attributes	25	10	For this section: · A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required. · A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required
Antecedent & Consequence	25	10	This section requires the identification of: · 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. · 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. · A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Empirical Referents	20	8	This section requires the identification of: · 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. · A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Construct Cases	30	12	This section requires: · 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: o Definition o All identified attributes · 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. · 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
Theoretical Applications of the Concept	30	12	This section requires: · Discussion of the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. · Explanation on how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. · A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Conclusion	10	4	This section requires: · Summarization of key information regarding: · Selected nursing concept. · Selected nursing theory. · Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing (specific to selected specialty track professional role and/or area of practice). · The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)
Paper Specifications	20	8	A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. Paper meets length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
APA Format (6^th edition)	10	4	Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6^th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. One deduction for each type of APA style error
Citations in Text	5	2	Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.
Writing Mechanics	5	2	Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual.
Total	250	100 %	A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

NR501 Week 3: Concept Analysis Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria	Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance	Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance	Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance	Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance	Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance
Content Possible Points = 230 Points
Introduction	10 Points	9 Points	8 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Introduction	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.	Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
Definition/ Explanation of Selected Concept	25 Points	22 Points	20 Points	10 Points	0 Points
Definition/ Explanation of Selected Concept	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited support from scholarly sources.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.
Literature Review	35 Points	31 Points	28 Points	13 Points	0 Points
Literature Review	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in a disorganized fashion.
Defining Attributes	25 Points	22 Points	20 Points	10 Points	0 Points
Defining Attributes	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes Support from scholarly sources provided.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Support from scholarly sources provided.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Limited support from scholarly sources provided.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.
Antecedent & Consequence	25 Points	22 Points	20 Points	10 Points	0 Points
Antecedent & Consequence	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly literature was provided.
Empirical Referents	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	8 Points	0 Points
Empirical Referents	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.
Construct Cases	30 Points	26 Points	24 Points	11 Points	0 Points
Construct Cases	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: · Definition · All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
Theoretical Applications of the Concept	30 Points	26 Points	24 Points	11 Points	0 Points
Theoretical Applications of the Concept	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Conclusion	10 Points	9 Points	8 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Conclusion	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.	Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
Paper Specifications	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	8 Points	0 Points
Paper Specifications	This section included all of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.	This section included three of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.	This section included only two of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.	This section included only one of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.	This section included none of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
		Content Subtotal			_____of 230 points
Format Possible Points = 20 Points
APA Style	10 Points	9 Points	8 Points	4 Points	0 Points
APA Style	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric 2 – 3 APA errors were present	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA were are present	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA were are present	APA guidelines, as per the 6^th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the · title page, · running head, · body of paper (including citations and headings), and · reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present
Citations	5 Points	4 Points	3 Points	2 Points	0 Points
Citations	There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.	There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.	There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge	There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric	There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
Writing Quality	5 Points	4 Points	3 Points	2 Points	0 Points
Writing Quality	1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual	3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual	5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual	7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual	9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6^th edition of the APA manual

Format Subtotal	_____of 20 points
Total Points	_____of 250 points
Comments: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric