NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion

Chamberlain University NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion                     

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion                     

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion                     

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion                     

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion                     

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion Included After Question

NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion

NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion

PURPOSE
The purpose of this reflective discussion is to encourage student reflection upon concepts learned
during the module and their contribution to professional growth. Students will reflect upon learning
within each module and connect insights gained with course-specific outcomes.
DUE DATE
•
•
Reflection 1 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday during Modules 1–8 of the session.
Reflection 2 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Modules 1–7 of the session
and due 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday at the end of Module 8 of the session.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 15 POINTS
REFLECTION OVERVIEW
This course includes eight weekly modules of content. During each of the eight modules within this
course session, please respond to the following reflective questions, beginning with Module 1 (the first
week of the session) and continuing in consecutive order throughout the eight modules of the course
session.
For each module, consider the course concepts and topics addressed during the respective module,
and respond to the following questions.
Reflection 1: Review the course outcomes and consider the module objectives. What do you
hope to learn during this module of study?
Reflection 2: Based on your response to Reflection 1, state one insight that you gained regarding
the concepts in this module. Connect learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome
addressed during this module.
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
1
REFLECTION INSTRUCTIONS
1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
2. Read the two reflective questions and respond within the following timeframes noted above.
3. Follow the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and sentence and paragraph
structures.
4. The use of first person tense is acceptable in the reflective discussions.
REFLECTION CRITERIA
Category
Points
%
Description
Reflection 1
6
40%
Reflective posting is submitted and describes what the student
hopes to learn during this module.
Reflection 2
6
40%
Reflective posting is submitted and
• describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in
this module; and
• connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course
outcome addressed in this module.
Timeliness of
Postings
3
20%
During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made
before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT.
AND
During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made
between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.
OR
During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made
between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT.
Graduatelevel Writing
Style
It is an expectation that graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced by correct:
• Grammar
• Spelling
• Word usage
• Punctuation
• Sentence structure
• Paragraph structure
If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted.
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
2
Total
15
100%
A quality reflective discussion will meet or exceed all the above
requirements.
GRADING RUBRIC
Reflection
Criteria
Met
Not Met
Reflection 1
6 Points
0 Points
Reflective posting is submitted and describes
what the student hopes to learn during this
module.
Reflective posting is submitted but fails to clearly
describe what the student hopes to learn during
this module.
OR
No posting is submitted in response to Reflection
1.
Reflection 2
6 Points
0 Points
Reflective posting is submitted and
• describes one insight gained regarding
the concepts in this module; and
• connects learning achieved to a
minimum of one course outcome
addressed in this module.
Reflective posting is submitted but fails to meet
one or both of the following criteria.
• Describes one insight gained regarding
the concepts in this module.
• Connects learning achieved to a minimum
of one course outcome addressed in this
module.
OR
No posting is submitted in response to Reflection
2.
Timeliness of
Postings
3 Points
0 Points
The following expectations for timely postings
are met:
One or more of the following expectations for
timely postings are not met:
During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to
Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59
p.m. MT.
During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to
Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59
p.m. MT.
AND
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
3
AND
During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00
a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.
During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m.
MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.
OR
OR
During Module 8: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00
a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT.
Graduatelevel Writing
Style
During Module 8: Posting in response to
Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m.
MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT.
0 Points Deducted
Graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced
by correct:
• Grammar
• Spelling
• Word usage
• Punctuation
• Sentence structure
• Paragraph structure
MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019
3 Points Deducted
One or more errors is present in any of the
following areas.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Grammar
Spelling
Word usage
Punctuation
Sentence structure
Paragraph structure
4
Chamberlain University
Collaboration Café Rubric
Collaboration Café Guidelines and
Grading Rubric
Purpose
In specific weeks of the course, you will have the opportunity to collaborate with your classmates in the Collaboration Café for a
graded assignment. The point value of the weekly assignment can be worth either 30 or 50 points, and the point value will be
identified on each assignment. The Collaboration Café is an interactive process among the students. Faculty participation will be
minimal; however, faculty will monitor this section for compliance and clarification.
Due Date
•
The suggested due date for the primary and responsive postings is Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of the week that corresponds
with the module (e.g., Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 2 for the Collaboration Café in Module 2).
•
All Collaboration Cafés must be submitted by Monday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Module 8 with the exception of the Module 8
Collaboration Café. The due date for Module 8 is Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Total Points Possible: 50 points (30 points for some instances)
Requirements
In the graded Collaboration Café, students are expected to post their initial response and then interact with at least two different
classmates during that module for a total of three postings per Collaboration Café worth 50 points, and two postings per
Collaboration Café worth 30 points.
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022
Chamberlain University
Collaboration Café Rubric
Scholarly references are not required in the Collaboration Café discussions; however, if the student chooses to submit a reference,
APA format must be followed. There may also be times when faculty will have you review a website or article. In cases like these,
you must properly cite and reference according to APA to avoid plagiarism. In addition, proper grammar is expected. Faculty may
submit the discussion to Turnitin in order to verify originality of work. Plagiarism will result in a zero for the week. Uncivil comments
toward peers or faculty, in any of the posts, will not be tolerated and will result in a zero for the week.
A substantive post will include the following.
• Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive manner
• Demonstrates application of course concepts
• Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice
• Responds to classmates with an extended description instead of merely agreeing
GRADING RUBRIC
Category
Points
%
Description
Discussion content
•
25 (12)*
25%
Response to peers
15 (8)*
15%
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022
•
•
Addresses the Collaboration Café question in a thorough, substantive
manner
Demonstrates application of course concepts
Discusses implications to advanced nursing practice
•
•
•
Includes substantive content that poses new ideas
Asks questions that prompt additional dialogue
Adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner
Chamberlain University
APA, grammar, spelling, syntax,
and organizational flow
Collaboration Café Rubric
5
5%
Participation requirement
5
Total
50 (30)*
5%
100%
•
APA, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organizational flow of the content reflects
professional standards
•
•
Primary posting in response to the questions posed is present
Minimum of two responsive posts to peers. When the Collaboration Café is
worth 30 points, only one responsive post to a peer is required.
A quality assignment will meet all of the above requirements.
*A score in parenthesis represents the 30 point scale.
GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment
Criteria
Outstanding level of
performance
100%
Satisfactory level of
performance
86%
Deficient level of performance
68%
Unsatisfactory level of
performance
0%
50-Point Scale
30-Point Scale
25
12
22
10
17
8
0
Discussion
content
Presentation of information
includes all of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
Presentation of information
includes two of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
MSN AT Track Collaboration Café_Rubric_11/24/2022
Presentation of information
includes one of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
Presentation of information
includes none of the following.
• Addresses the
Collaboration Café
question in a thorough,
substantive manner
Chamberlain University
•
•
Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of
the topic to a specific
practice area
Collaboration Café Rubric
•
•
Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of the
topic to a specific practice
area
•
•
Explains opinion
thoroughly about the
required topic
Applies the concepts of the
topic to a specific practice
area

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion

Title: NR 528 Chamberlain College of Nursing Module 4 Nursing Discussion

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
ScholarlinessDemonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisionsEvaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge -Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real lifeInteractions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real lifeDoes not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson contentDoes not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignoredNo discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive DialogueReplies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.(5 points possible per graded thread)	Exceeds minimum post requirementsReplies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peerSummarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate daysReplies to a question posed by a peerSummarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadlineDoes not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the weekDiscussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the threadNo connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APANote: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format.Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format.Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format.Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format.Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.Writing style does not facilitate communication.The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirementsper discussion thread	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirementper discussion thread	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.