NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment

Chamberlain University NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment                     

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment                     

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Online Nursing Essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

How to Write the Body for NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment                     

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment                     

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment                     

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment Included After Question

NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment

Week 1: Alternative Writing Assignment

Purpose

The Alternative Writing Assignment mirrors the discussion content of Debriefing and will allow the student to expand their knowledge of physical health assessment principles specific to the advanced practice role.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER: NR 509 Week 1: Alternative Writing Assignment

1. Identify and articulate advanced assessment health history and physical examination techniques which are relevant to a focused body system (CO 1)

2. Differentiate normal and abnormal findings with regard to a disease or condition that impacts the body system (CO 2)

3. Adapt advanced assessment skills if necessary to suit the needs of specific patient populations (CO 4)

Due Date:

The alternative writing assignment is due no later than the Sunday 11:59 PM MT of the week in which the student did not attend the weekly debriefing session. For example, if you did not attend a debriefing session for Week 3, the written assignment is due the Sunday at the end of Week 4.

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. NR 509 Week 1: Alternative Writing Assignment

Total Points Possible: 30 Points

Requirements:

NOTE: Complete the NR 509 Alternative Writing Assignment ONLY if you did not attend or do not plan to attend Debriefing for the given week.

1. This paper will be appraised on the quality of the information, inclusion of at least one evidence-based scholarly source, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, and organization based on the required components (see the paper headings and content details below).

2. Scholarly sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

3. The length of the paper is to be no less than 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list.

4. Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”

5. APA format (6th edition) is required in this assignment, explicitly for in-text citations and the reference list. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1 inch margins and double spacing. See the APA manual for details regarding proper citation.

6. Organize the headings and content of your paper using the outline below:

o Select a body system relevant to the lesson from the previous week for the topic of this paper. For example, if you are writing this assignment for Week 2, then select the HEENT, Respiratory, or Integumentary system as the focus for the paper (not all three systems). NOTE: If you are writing this assignment for Week 1, select the Health History as the topic of the paper.

o Discuss the physiology (structure and function) of the body system including details about the major organ systems (if applicable). NOTE: If you are writing the assignment for Week 1, provide an overview of interviewing techniques. NR 509 Week 1: Alternative Writing Assignment

o Construct relevant health history questions (subjective data) pertaining to the body system. NOTE: If writing the assignment for Week 1, construct relevant health history questions for all body systems as included on the review of systems (ROS).

o Provide an overview of the objective data and expected normal physical examination findings for this body system. NOTE: If writing this assignment for Week 1, provide the expected normal subjective findings for each body systems on the ROS.

o Explain special physical assessment examination techniques or procedures specific to assessing this body system. NOTE: If writing the assignment for Week 1, explain advanced interview techniques.

o Analyze and discuss how you might adapt your physical assessment skills or interviewing techniques to accommodate each of the following specific populations:

§ Infant/pediatric

§ Pregnancy

§ Geriatric

o Identify one major disease or disease process that may significantly impact this body system. NOTE: If writing the assignment for Week 1, identify one disease process or condition that may significantly hinder conducting a Health History interview.

o Synthesis and discuss the expected abnormal physical examination findings that may be associated with this disease or disease process.

o Summarize the key points.

o References in correct APA format

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category

Points

%

Description

Application of Knowledge, Analysis, and Clarity

10

33.33

The quality of this criterion will be evaluated based uponthe following: demonstration of analysis, synthesis, and/or application of principles and concepts consistent with the principles of advanced physical assessment; relevance of content specific to the topic; expected normal findings, appropriate health history questions, and organization and clear presentation of information.

Adapted Physical Assessment Skills to Special Populations, Disease Process, Summary, and Scholarly Source

10

33.33

The quality of this criterion will be evaluated based upon the following: discussion regarding how to adapt physical assessment skills or techniques to accommodate all special populations; identification and discussion of one major disease or disease process and expected examination findings; and summation of key points. Must include at least one scholarly source to support the paper.

Total CONTENT Points= 20 pts

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT

Category

Points

%

Description

Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics,APA Format, and Word Requirement

10

33.33

The assignment has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post. The length of the paper is not less than 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list.

* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the discussion

Total FORMAT Points= 10 pts

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 30 points

Rubric

Title:

NR509 Weeks 1-6 Alternative Writing Assignment_Sept19

NR509 Weeks 1-6 Alternative Writing Assignment_Sept19

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 20 Points

Criterion 1

Application of Knowledge, Analysis, and Clarity

Must demonstrate the following elements:

Select an appropriate topic or focus for the assignment;

Demonstrate analysis, synthesis, and/or application of principles and concepts
consistent with advanced physical assessment;

Provide appropriate health history questions;

Identify the expected normal findings;

Content is specific to the topic;

Paper is organized and clearly presented.

(6 Required Elements)

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 pts

Excellent

Demonstrates all elements of the Criterion

Edit ratingDelete rating

9.0 pts

V. Good

Missing 1 element of the Criterion

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements of the Criterion

Edit ratingDelete rating

5.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements of the Criterion

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 or more elements OR No assignment

pts

10.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 2 Adapted Physical Assessment Skills to Special Populations, Disease Process, Summary, and Scholarly Sources

Must demonstrate the following elements:

Discuss how to adapt physical assessment skills or techniques to accommodate all special populations;

Identify one major disease or disease process and expected examination findings;

Demonstrate appropriate knowledge of physical assessment examination techniques or procedures;

Identify abnormal findings;

Summarize key points

Must include at least one scholarly source

(6 Required Elements)

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 pts

Excellent

Demonstrates all elements of the Criterion

Edit ratingDelete rating

9.0 pts

V. Good

Missing 1 element of the Criterion

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements of the Criterion

Edit ratingDelete rating

5.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements of the Criterion

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 or more elements OR No assignment

pts

10.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 10 Points

Format Criterion 1

Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics, APA Format, and Word Requirement

NOTE: Failure to comply with the word requirements for this assignment will result in the grade of zero (0) for this Criterion.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format

Edit ratingDelete rating

9.0 pts

V. Good

2-3 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format

Edit ratingDelete rating

5.0 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

8 or more errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, mechanics, and APA format Or Less than 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list OR No assignment

pts

10.0 pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 pts

Minus Points

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 pts

Minus Points

pts

0.0 pts

Total Points: 30.0 out of 30.0

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0

Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0

Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0

Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
  0 points lost       -5 points lost

Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.       The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days

Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.       The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment

Title: NR 509 Week 1 Alternative Writing Assignment

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.