NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent

Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent                  

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent                  

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent                  

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent                  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent                  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent Included After Question

Sample Answer for NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent Included After Question

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to: a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your planning a policymaker call b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your healthcare policy issue and the policymaking process, and c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent

Title: NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent

With an estimated 400,000 illegal or undocumented immigrants in Georgia, Georgia is on record as one of the states with the most stringent immigration healthcare laws (Ridder, 2015). Under federal law, Georgia’s undocumented immigrants are prohibited from receiving public or private healthcare services, purchasing private health insurance, or receiving public healthcare insurance; however, they can receive emergency healthcare services at a hospital ER. Undocumented immigrants can also receive limited healthcare services from state approved community health centers or safety net hospitals. Georgia adheres to federal laws governing healthcare services, but state law enforcement agencies have begun to enforce the “show me your papers” clause under Georgia’s central immigration law (Yee, 2017). This clause places severe restrictions on undocumented immigrants’ ability to travel. Undocumented immigrants are less likely to seek health services because they may be deported after receiving treatment (Sconyers & Tate, 2016). My public policy focuses on making healthcare services more accessible to Georgia’s undocumented immigrant population. The health policy will focus on providing a standard delivery of equitable health care services (to include low cost vaccinations for school age children and six-month health checkups) for all undocumented immigrants in Georgia. The policy will also include a provision that blocks medical deportation while receiving any of the medical services listed within the conditions of this new public health policy. 

My public policy issue impacts Georgia’s nurses because the law restricts the type of healthcare services nurses can offer to undocumented immigrants. This raises ethical issues as nurses are both the central health providers for patient care and information resources who drive patient safety and quality. There is no specific Georgia legislator in charge of immigration legislation. Each immigration bill, and there are many of them, is authored by one or several state representatives or senators and sponsored by various committees. In that my policy is healthcare based, I will contact State Representative Sharon Cooper. I think she would be interested in my policy issue for several reasons: Rep. Cooper is the chairperson over the Health and Human Services Committee; she has an MSN in Nursing; she is a member of the Special Committee on Saving Grady Memorial Hospital (Atlanta’s largest “safety net” hospital). She is a noted conservative, but I believe her experiences in nursing and education make her a compassionate and knowledgeable ally for my public health policy. Rep. Copper can be reached at the State Capitol in Atlanta, GA (404-656-5069) or at the district office in Marietta, GA (770- 956- 8357. Her email address is [email protected]., and her Facebook link is https://www.facebook.com/State-Rep-Sharon-Cooper-133816235514/.

Key Points:

The context of the public healthcare policies aimed at undocumented immigrants living in Georgia starts with laws passed on the federal level. Georgia must follow federal guidelines regarding healthcare services for undocumented immigrants, the type of medical services provided, and the location healthcare services can be received (Ballotpedia, 2018). However, the state can also create its own immigration laws that do not conflict with federal provisions. Instead of passing a public health policy that benefits undocumented immigrants and legal residents, for the greater good of society, state legislators have chosen to pass laws that limit the scope of care undocumented immigrants can receive outside of the ER if they do not present a valid ID. Georgia’s public healthcare policy is so restrictive that as of October 2016  enacted legislation does not even allow lawfully residing immigrants to enroll in Medicaid or CHIP (Ballotpedia, 2018). Georgia legislators are conservative and want to provide as little healthcare services to immigrants as possible, which is evident by many of the state laws that have been passed regarding this population.

One of the identified need for changes is Georgia’s legislators’ ideas about undocumented immigrants and their connection with spreading diseases. For example, Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga. wrote an impassioned letter to the CDC in July of 2014 advocating for stricter federal immigration polices because he feels undocumented immigrant children carry all types of diseases, such as dengue fever and tuberculosis that place other school age children at risk (Poon, 2014). In response, the CDC released a statement that there is little evidence that undocumented immigrants are to blame for diseases outbreaks of measles, pertussis, hepatitis C, and other diseases (Tani, 2015). This is also a key point that I will have to overcome when presenting my public healthcare policy to Rep. Cooper. Another identified need for change is that both Georgia and the federal government’s public healthcare policies allow for the deportation of sick undocumented immigrants. In Georgia, hospitals are no longer “sensitive locations” protected from enforcement actions. This poses ethical issues for nurses and doctors, as they are legally forced to stop treatment on sick patients under arrest.  

The goal is to provide undocumented immigrants access to a better and varied set of healthcare services. Another goal is to eliminate medical deportations and re-establish Georgia’s hospitals as “safe locations,” to include all medical facilities. My solution is to pass a socially and ethically appropriate public health policy that benefits legal residents and undocumented immigrants. The policy will eliminate medical deportations from “safe locations,” approve low cost preventative care checkups every six months with no ID required, and support low cost childhood vaccines for school age children. My rationale is to make healthcare services more accessible to undocumented immigrants and remove the threat of deportation to help them make a better informed decision about going to the doctor; therefore, minimizing the concerns of Georgia legislators about disease outbreaks. Providing a standard delivery of equitable health care services is a more noble use of Georgia’s economic resources. The low cost paid by undocumented immigrants will help offset some of the medical costs absorbed by the state, which will be offset by some of the $67 million in federal funds Georgia receives for healthcare.

Analysis of Empirical Evidence:

The CDC has acknowledged there is a risk of high levels of disease spreading but that risk does not stem from undocumented immigrants alone (Jacobson, 2015). Surveyed medical experts all agree that there is “no hard data” to prove that undocumented immigrants have spread unusually high levels disease; a disease outbreak can come from legal immigrants, refugees, international travelers, and yes even from a U.S. citizen (Jacobson, 2015). Therefore, continuing to pass Georgia legislation that limits undocumented immigrants access to healthcare based upon these grounds is counterproductive. The success of my public health policy hangs on my ability to show that undocumented immigrants do not pose a strain on Georgia’s healthcare system and that undocumented immigrants will not trigger a disease outbreak. I must also show that medical deportations pose more risk, as scrutiny and lawsuits from anti-immigrations coalitions and civil liberties organizations like the ACLU will grow.

I plan to convey this message to Rep. Cooper. I know her schedule is busy, so getting a meeting may be challenging. My contingency plan is to set up a meeting with another member of the Health and Human Services Committee, Kim Schofield (D – Atlanta). Before I present my public policy, I must develop a solid objective, clear plan of delivery, and a written proposal of my public policy. My aim is to evoke empathy and compassion for undocumented immigrants and familiarity with the nursing profession and its goals. I would also like to bring some charts and graphs that validate the details of my proposal. I must give Rep. Cooper a chance to present her point of view but be able to provide counterpoints that open the floor to meaningful discourse and hopefully some resolution. It is critical that I present with confidence and stick to my presentation. Communication skills are critical, such as maintaining eye contact, steadying my tone of voice, and using visual aids.

Importance and Impact to Nursing:

Under current Georgia law, nurses are under no obligation to report undocumented patients, but they are also under no obligation to provide treatment outside of an ER setting. Some nurses may feel obligated to call immigration enforcement on foreign patients who present fake IDs or who they suspect are undocumented immigrants. Nurses who report illegal immigrants raise ethical concerns within the nursing profession: nonmalfeasance, beneficence, confidentiality, fidelity (Sconyers & Tate, 2016). If nurses exercise their legal rights not to disclose any personal information about a suspected undocumented patient to immigration enforcement officials, their silence is often the nail in the coffin that causes undocumented patients to be carted off in cuffs. The ethical dilemma for nurses raises questions about whether nurses have a higher ethical responsibility to the government or to the professional code. (Sconyers & Tate, 2016). 

Conclusion:

Georgia’s public health policy regarding access and type of healthcare for undocumented immigrants is in dire need of reform. The policy approves medical deportation and offers limited access to healthcare services, which restricts 400,000 people from seeking necessary healthcare services. My policy calls for comprehensive policy reform that expands access to health care for undocumented immigrants based on an analysis of their impact on health care expenditures, public health, and the role of health care providers. Nurses can advocate this reform on ethical grounds, maintaining the goal is to improve the health of everyone in Georgia.

References

Ballotpedia. (2018). Immigration in Georgia: Public policy in Georgia. Retrieved from https://ballotpedia.org/Immigration_in_Georgia

Jacobson, L. (2105, July 23). Are illegal immigrants bringing ‘tremendous’ disease across the border, as Trump says? Unlikely. POLITIFACT. Retrieved from http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/jul/23/are-illegal-immigrants-bringing-tremendous-diseas/

Poon, L. (2014, July 22). The immigrant kids have health issues — but not the ones you’d think. National Public Radio (NPR). Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2014/07/22/332598798/the-immigrant-kids-have-health-issues-but-not-the-ones-youd-think

Ridder, K. (2105, September 14). Illegal immigration population in Georgia. NewsMax. Retrieved from https://www.newsmax.com/fastfeatures/illegal-immigration-georgia/2015/09/14/id/691510/

Sconyers, J., & Tate, T. (2016). How should clinicians treat patients who might be undocumented? AMA Journal of Ethics, 18(3), 229-236. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.03.ecas4-1603

Tani, M. (2015, February 24). CDC official dismisses claim that undocumented immigrants bring measles into the U.S. Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/23/undocumented-immigrants-measles-outbreak_n_6737102.html

Yee, A. (2017, May 31). Feds, states target southern ‘sanctuary cities’. Savannah Now[Savannah]. Retrieved from http://www.savannahnow.com/lavozlatinaonline/noticias/2017-05-31/feds-states-target-southern-sanctuary-cities

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)
(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2, 3, 10)
(CO#4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)
(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO4, 7, 10)
Due DateSunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3
Total Points:175 points
Requirements
Assignment Criteria for Presentation:
1. Provide an introduction to your healthcare policy-priorityissue and the title or name of your legislator.
2. Articulate key points under each of the Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1 sections.
3. Provide a critique of empirical evidence that supports your chosen healthcare policy-priority issue and analysis.
4. Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy-priority issue to nursing.
5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.
6. The paper will be a minimum of 4 pages and a maximum offive pages in length,in APA format 6th edition,excluding the title and reference page.
Preparing the Paper
After completing Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1, address all areas on the worksheet in the body of a scholarly paper. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references published within the past 5 years.
Category Points % Description
Introduction and Conclusion 35 20 Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy- priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator.
Concluding statements summarizing content.
Key Points 40 23 Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue (review sections of Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet) are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.
Empirical Evidence 40 23 Provide a critique of empirical evidence thatsupports your chosen healthcare policy issue and analysis.
Impact and Importance to Nursing 35 20 Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy issue to nursing.
APA Format 10 6 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format.
Writing Quality 15 8 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence, and paragraph format and punctuation.
Total 175 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria Exceptional
(100%)
Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds
(88%)
Very good or high level of performance Meets
(80%)
Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement
(38%)
Poor or failing level of performance Developing
(0)
Unsatisfactory level of performance
ContentPossible Points = 150 Points
Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue. Concluding statements summarizing content are present.
35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 Points
Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present, clear, and well written.
Introduction introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the name or title of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present. Minor clarity or detail issues.
Introduction and conclusion are included; could include more details such as a specific healthcare policy-priority issue that a legislator could act upon or the name or title of the legislator; clarity or improvement of format.
Lacking introduction or conclusion.
No attempt made at introduction or conclusion.
Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.
40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 Points
Key points are well described, and analysis is fully articulated.
Key points are described with some lack of clarity, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.
Key points are not well described, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.
Key points or analysis is missing.
Key points and analysis is missing.
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy-priority issue is clearly critiqued.
40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 Points
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is clearly critiqued in a comprehensive and accurate manner.
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is critiqued but lacking clarity or not substantive.
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is noted but not critiqued.
Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy priority issue is lacking.
No attempt made at providing empirical evidence.
Your healthcare policy- priority issue clearly demonstrates the impact and or importance of your issue to nursing or the intended impact to patient outcomes.
35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 Points
Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice is thoroughly discussed.
Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has rare inaccuracy.
Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies.
Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies and is vague.
Content Subtotal_____of 150 points
Format Possible Points = 25 Points
APA Format: Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format 6thedition.
10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points
Paper is free from APA errors throughout.
There are 1-2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 3-4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s)
Writing Quality: Paper is appropriate in length. References include a minimum of 5 scholarly references excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.
15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Paper is appropriate in length. References include more than the minimum number of scholarly references, excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.
Paper is short/long in length and/or contains a minimum of scholarly references excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1-2 exceptions.
Paper is short/long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3-4 exceptions.
Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors.
Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent

APA Writing Checklist

Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.

☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.

☐  The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ Topic is well defined.

☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.

☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.

☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.

☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.

Also Read: NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue ( Bicycle Helmet Policy ) Recent 

Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.

Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.

Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.

Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.

Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.

☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent

TITLE: NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) Recent