NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent                  

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent                  

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Online Nursing Essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

How to Write the Body for NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent                  

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent                  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent                  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent Included After Question

NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

Effective Coalition Leadership

Describe the various elements necessary for effective leadership within a coalition. How does this apply to your professional practice or life?

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

TITLE: NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

Coalitions is defined as a congregation of liked minded individuals that come together to address a particular problem or issue to reach a common goal. Leaders are important in all roles however an effective leader is one who is strong minded and goal oriented. Effective leaders possess qualities of strength, empowerment, courage, critical thinking and strong ethical values. Leaders of coalitions keep their team focused and on task. The leaders have to the ability to direct members of their organization. “Leadership is a broad term used to describe an individual’s ability to define a vision within a specific competency; leadership is a complex and multifaceted role” (Pravikoff, 2017).

Effective leadership is important to everyday life as well as our careers in nursing. My family consist of 7 people. My husband and I have 5 children. Although we govern our house and rules together, I look at my husband as the leader of our coalition. Our family has goals to be as successful as possible. We work together to ensure our children do well in school in order to be successful in life. As the leader, my husband keeps everyone on task and focused towards a common goal. He applies the knowledge and skill set of organization and critical thinking to our daily routines. Sometimes we filter off task and he bring us back into focus.

In Week 3, we moved from identifying a specific health policy proposal to exploring how to move the proposal forward through the work of coalitions. One of the key goals of coalitions is to change social or public policy. Special-interest coalitions can play a key strategic role in moving legislation forward.  Across the class, leadership of the coalition was identified as a critical factor in coalition effectiveness. Our focus in Week 3 was on the following course outcomes: advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that influence healthcare and its consumers and nurses and their nursing practice (PO 2, 10). Developing health policy can be inherently adversarial due to the nature of the process; stakeholders frequently differ on how to solve a health policy problem.  Nurses are experienced in advocating for their patients in an environment of competing priorities; they can successfully transfer those skills to become an effective nurse advocate.    

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent:

Further it is important to remember the need for evidence-informed policy. 

Although we did not discuss evidence-informed policy, the following four reasons are examples of why it is important to use evidence to develop health policy:

  1. Solutions are based on science rather than assumptions;
    1. Solutions are practical;
    1. Solutions are designed to address lessons learned from previous policy options; and
    1. Solutions are perceived by policymakers as being more credible.  

I look forward to reading your priority policy assignment this week.  I hope to have grading done by  no later than Sunday but that could be a challenge given my eye surgery.  When formatting your paper, to prevent forgetting any critical requirements, use the grading rubric to develop your headings. The empirical evidence section can be integrated. Headings are a short phrase describing what the succeeding section is about and facilitate transition from one topic to another.

Coalitions are made up of groups of people who come together with a common goal. Coalitions can be a powerful tool for change. In order for a coalition to provide any change, there needs to be a strong leadership involved. In order for a coalition to be effective, there needs to be a strong organizational structure with clear, defined roles. There also needs to be a formal set of bylaws and policies in place (SAMHSA, 2017).  Organization is key in any successful coalition. This applies to our professional practice in many ways. In the hospital setting, many policies are created by practice councils. In these councils, many members of different departments come together with one common goal. These groups are well organized and have a strong leadership. Because of this, many policies are created and maintained and issues are addressed. Beyond the hospital setting, these different groups come together to lobby for medical and nursing related issues.

Thanks,

Reference:

Components of an effective coalition. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/capt/tools-learning-resources/components-effective-coalition

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

TITLE: NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

You have made some excellent points about what takes to become an effective leader. During my undergraduate nursing studies, all of my professors would say that “nurses have made a professional commitment to learning.”  They would also say that “nurses in leadership positions should become experts in relationship-building and accountability.” Effective leadership in coalitions includes these three aspects, just as effective nurse leaders should hone and build on these skills to lead their teams and organizations to successful outcomes. In my area of nursing (LTC), I see that nursing competency does not always prepare a person to become a leader. I have been employed at medical facilities in which the Director of Nursing is well-skilled in nursing techniques and procedures, but less than apt at supervising nursing staff. I have also been supervised by LTC charge nurses who did awesome jobs of assessing patients and making sure the appropriate care had been given, but who were intimidated by staff nurses. I stated in my post that leadership is a skill or ability that must be taught. You allude to skill building  in your post, as well. A featured blog post on the Nurse.com site by Williamson (2017) says that there is a difference between a nurse manager and a nurse leader. I think the author’s explanation makes good sense. Do you believe there is a difference between the two, they complement each other, or they are one in the same?

Thank you

Reference:

Williamson, E. (2017, May 23). Nurse manager vs. nurse leader: What’s the difference?. Retrieved from https://www.nurse.com/blog/2017/05/23/nurse-manager-vs-nurse-leader-whats-the-difference/

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

TITLE: NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

Coalitions and Nursing   

A coalition is a group of people who share a common goal and work together to influence change (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). Coalitions can formulate decisions only if they are able to look at the overall picture and determine how the decision will affect different people and various organizations (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). Strong leadership is essential for a coalition to be successful (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). This element is necessary so that the group will have direction and be able to accomplish goals that it sets (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). The leader must be able to foresee a clear vision of what the group is trying to achieve (Mennella, & Balderrama, 2017). Leaders must possess the ability to actively listen to every party involved in the decision-making process in order to learn different viewpoints, and then they have to be able to think long term as to how their decision affects both the members of their group as well as outside organizations (Mennella, & Balderrama, 2017). Effective leaders of a coalition will need to mediate between different groups involved in the shared goal; they might be called to evaluate opposing sides of an issue after ensuring all members feel that they have had an equal input in the decisions (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). An accomplished leader can interact with representatives from different agencies spanning from healthcare organizations to government officials (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). Like any leader in any organization, the leader in a coalition needs to be fair and willing to listen to the other members’ opinions (Mennella, & Balderrama, 2017).

By being master prepared nurses, we will be the ones implementing change in the healthcare system. Nurses comprise over three million members in the current healthcare population (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). We are in a position to be able to join together and accomplish real change that can affect patients’ lives (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). The nursing profession has laid a foundation for being an advocate for patients while also fighting for policies and procedures that need to change (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). Falling into coalition membership seems natural for nurses. We are going to be viewed as leaders and decision makers. With this responsibility, we must be educated in the current issues and be willing to put in the time and effort to improve our current healthcare system. Along with these responsibilities we will be granted positions of power. Ultimately, we must be willing to tackle these issues and assume these roles to benefit our profession and our patients.

References

Green, A., & Edmonson, C. (2013). An Opportunity to Lead: State Coalitions. Nurse Leader1128,39-31,39. doi:10.1016/j.mnl.2012.11.00

Mennella, H. A., & Balderrama, D. M. (2017). Leadership: Facilitating Change. CINAHL Nursing Guide,

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership Recent

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0

Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0

Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0

Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA 

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
  0 points lost       -5 points lost

Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.       The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days

Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.       The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.