NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review

Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review                  

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review                  

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review                  

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review                  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review                  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review Included

NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review

Title: NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review

​Yes, it will be important for participants to journal their progress. If you are trying to fulfill an objective, you need to monitor your progress. Since the participants are invested in the study, it is crucial to analyze things from their perspective. They have something to gain from the research if it works, that is, losing weight and reducing the risk of advancing to diabetes. Journals are effective ways of encouraging progress monitoring to improve behavioral performance and increase the likelihood of achieving goals. Harkin and his counterparts carried out a meta-analysis of 138 studies consisting of a total of 19,951 participants that explores the effectiveness of an intervention by requiring the respondents to monitor their progress. The studies examined personal health objectives, such as losing weight, changing diet, lowering blood pressure, and quitting smoking. The authors discovered that requesting the subjects to monitor their progress towards an objective increases the possibility that they will achieve the goal (Bull et al., 2020). Furthermore, frequent monitoring increases the chances of success.

​Stakeholders are organizations or individuals who have an interest in the project or affect or are affected by the study outcomes. Stakeholders also include people who are supportive of the study and those who are less supportive, but critical of it. The engagement of stakeholders in research is often attributed to ensuring that the study is more impactful to users. However, some stakeholders with vested interests in a study may not be obvious. For example, a study may not only affect the current generation of human beings but also future generations (Silva et al., 2019). The stakeholders in my research include patients, their family members, physicians, insurance providers, healthcare institutions, and the community. Pre-diabetic patients will benefit from improved health outcomes. Diabetes can be a costly affair; hence, family members will experience a reduced disease burden. Physicians will have more knowledge to share with their patients. Insurance providers, healthcare institutions, and the community will witness an improvement in population health.

References

Bull, F. C., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S., Borodulin, K., Buman, M. P., Cardon, G., … & Willumsen, J. F. (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British journal of sports medicine, 54(24), 1451-1462.

Silva, L. M. D., Bitencourt, C. C., Faccin, K., & Iakovleva, T. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the context of responsible innovation: A meta-synthesis. Sustainability, 11(6), 1766.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review

Title: NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review

I think that the PICOT question in this presentation is unique and exciting. The question addresses the significance of education on a healthy diet and exercising to maintain weight and avoid childhood obesity. Note that its originality is based on exploring the impact of education in addressing obesity in children. It is also interesting because it focuses on a practical intervention that can lead to positive outcomes.

It is relatively easy to follow the presentation since it is clear and concise. The information has been provided in a structured manner whereby there is problem discussion, objectives, supporting evidence, and recommendations. However, some of these parts can be improved. The presentation can be enhanced by ensuring smooth transitions between sections and providing more straightforward headings for different areas.

The presentation’s recommendations are supported by sufficient evidence. Studies that discuss the impact of interventions on childhood obesity, such as education and behavior change programs, have been referenced in the presentation. However, more specific details about the findings in these studies could strengthen the recommendations. These references are adequate and accurate because they are relevant to childhood obesity and interventions. Moreover, they are from reputable sources representing a balanced view of the existing research.

The presentation significantly contributes to nursing knowledge by addressing a significant health issue and discussing potential interventions. According to Whitehead et al. (2021), childhood obesity prevalence has risen since 1975. It also highlights the critical role of education, evaluation, and engagement between parents and children in managing childhood obesity. The content of this presentation holds valuable applications for nurse practitioners (NPs) in their practice. As an NP, I can use the information to understand better the impact of education on childhood obesity and how to implement intervention strategies. I can incorporate the emphasis on assessment, body mass index measurement, and tailored care plans into their clinical practice. Additionally, NPs can consider the importance of involving parents and children in interventions and promoting healthier lifestyle choices.

Reference

Whitehead, L., Kabdebo, I., Dunham, M., Quinn, R., Hummelshoj, J., George, C., & Denney‐Wilson, E. (2021). The effectiveness of nurse‐led interventions to prevent childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity: A systematic review of randomised trials. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(12), 4612-4631. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14928

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review

Title: NR 505 Week 8: Discussion: Peer Review

Childhood obesity is a topic that is in need of advocacy. I agree that children obesity is a growing health concern. Nutrition education is provided to mothers during pregnancy and after. There are programs such as Women, Infants & children supplemental nutrition. Nutrition education should be continued with wellness appointments also. As children age  parents may overlook nutritional recommendations in order to get their children to eat. Parents must understand the importance of obesity in connection to disease prevention. I think that culture play a major role in food decisions. Your PICOT question is a great question to discuss your recommendation for a practice change. Low income is a major barrier of obesity because less expensive food choices will be consumed which are usually higher in calories and fat. You gave a great presentation on this evidenced-based practice recommendation change for clinical practice. 

I enjoyed viewing your presentation. It was clear, precise, and organized. The PICOT question provided was original and interesting to address as a primary issue. I too am taking the route in mental health and I do agree that this area needs more support access to be provided to the communities, especially the minority communities. This presentation is clear and easy to follow, each slide was well put together. Each area was addressed as well as the key components well delivered. Throughout the presentation, the evidence presented supported the presenter’s recommendations. Mental health programs is a great recommendation that should be accessible to every community. Many people do not admit or understand certain symptoms that they go through and they do not have any understanding.  With more programs available this could change many peoples lives.  The references provided are well balanced and is used throughout the presentation.  This presentation adds to nursing knowledge where we are able to assess and implement interventions to help others.  This is a great presentation and adds to the acknowledgment of the issue at hand that needs to be addressed.

Purpose

The purpose of the graded collaborative peer review is to provide students with the opportunity to engage in the critique of peers’ week 7 evidence-based projects. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Meaningful dialogue among students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

• CO 3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3, 4)
• CO 4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)
• CO 5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date

Week 8: Kaltura Presentation must be uploaded to Week 8 discussion by Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT week 8. Two responses to peer presentations are due by Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 8.

Total Points Possible: 100

Preparing the Assignment

Initial post: Create a Kaltura video presentation based on the PowerPoint slideshow you submitted in week 7. The slides you created should be displayed on your screen in the recorded presentation; Use of the Kaltura camera feature is optional. A clear audio presentation of the content should be included. While the presentation is due Wednesday, please consider posting the presentation to the discussion area early in the week to facilitate a robust discussion.

Kaltura Resources: Use the Kaltura resources found under the Resources tab in the course. If you have difficulty using Kaltura Capture Space, reach out to IT first (please obtain a ticket number). If you are still unable to record using Kaltura, reach out to your instructor for alternate recording options.

Participating in the Discussion: View and provide feedback on a minimum of 2 peer presentations. You may address some of the following questions in your responses:

1. Is the PICOT question original, relevant, and interesting?
2. Is the presentation clear and easy to follow?
3. Did the presentation provide sufficient evidence to support the presenter’s recommendations?
4. Are references accurate, adequate, and balanced?
5. Does the presentation add to nursing knowledge?
6. What applications do you see for the content of this presentation to your practice as an NP?

Your peer posts should add to the dialogue or ask questions about the presentation. 

Responses to two different peer presentations are due by Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 8.

**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category	Points	%	Description
Kaltura Presentation	50	50%	Kaltura is used for presentation. Recording is clear. Length of recording is between 7-20 minutes.
Peer discussion post #1	20	20%	Student responds substantively to a peer’s presentation, answering the following questions:Is the PICOT question original, relevant, and interesting?Is the presentation clear and easy to follow?Did the presentation provide sufficient evidence to support the presenter’s recommendations?Are references accurate, adequate, and balanced?Does the presentation add to nursing knowledge?What applications do you see for the content of this presentation to your practice as an NP?
Peer discussion post #2	20	20%	Student responds substantively to a peer’s presentation, answering the following questions:Is the PICOT question original, relevant, and interesting?Is the presentation clear and easy to follow?Did the presentation provide sufficient evidence to support the presenter’s recommendations?Are references accurate, adequate, and balanced?Does the presentation add to nursing knowledge?What applications do you see for the content of this presentation to your practice as an NP?
	90	90%	Total CONTENT Points= 170 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category	Points	%	Description
Grammar and Communication	10	10%	Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner
	10	10%	Total FORMAT Points = 10 pts
			ASSIGNMENT TOTAL = 100 points

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday.

A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned.

Faculty may submit any collaborative discussion posting to Turnitin in order to verify originality.