NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
Chamberlain University NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How to Write the Body for NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization Included
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
TITLE: NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
I am sure that nurse managers struggle when it comes to making assignments. They must have an equal balance that promotes quality care without leading to nursing fatigue or poor patient care. I have chosen the Synergy Model to further explain this.
The Synergy Model was made by the AACN and is applied everyday to clinical settings. This model is the relationship nurses and patients share while optimizing patient and family outcomes. It is a phenomenon that occurs when individuals work together towards a common goal. This applies to nurses because we as nurses have one common goal: caring for our patient. This model recognizes the actions of the nurse and the actions of the patient (Sechrist et al., 2010).
Nurse managers utilize the Synergy model when it comes to staffing assignments because they must consider the acuity of their patients. Does the patient need to be one-on-one? Does the patient need any particular care for any reason? What is the patient’s diagnosis? Nurse managers also must consider the nurse. Can this nurse handle this assignment? Can this nurse be diligent with this patient’s care? There are a lot of considerations that fall into play with nursing assignments and the Synergy Model is the best way this is applied today.
I no longer work as a floor nurse. I am in the Operating Room, but if the floor I previously worked on utilized the Synergy Model, I think I wouldn’t be so veered away from floor nursing.
Before I graduated nursing school with my Bachelors, I was a Certified Nursing Assistant on a Neuroscience Floor. Working as a CNA ruined floor nursing for me. My assignments every time I worked consisted of 18-22 patients at a time. If anybody has ever worked on a neuro floor, then you know this is not feasible. As a CNA, I was responsible for bathing every patient, taking them to the restroom, doing their vitals (sometimes every 15 minutes), etc. Most of our patients were either brain dead or had strokes. Stroke patients, as we know, can only utilize one half of their body. They were heavy patients. This whole floor was a total care floor, and nobody could just get up and walk themselves. They needed several staff members to assist with their moving. I would drown in my assignment, not because I could not handle it, but because the nurse managers did not realize how hard it was to take care of patients like this when it came to making the assignments. 18-22 patients were just far too much.
I grew a fatigue when it came to floor nursing. I wish this was not the case because often I feel I am missing out on a lot of the floor nursing hands on experience.
Reference:
Sechrist, K., Berlin, L., & Biel, M. (2010). The synergy model: overview of the theoretical review process. Critical Care Nurse, 20(1).
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
TITLE: NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
The theories that reflected my clinical practice the most were the Roy Adaptation Model and the Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory (SCDNT). I practice as a nurse clinician in a general dermatology outpatient clinic. However, we have a specialty clinic that focuses on oncodermatology. We see and treat patients with skin related issues from different cancers. During this clinic, I see the Roy Adaptation Model in practice. The minute a patient is diagnosed with cancer, they must adapt to their new circumstances. Their physiological mode is altered by the cancer cell mutation oftentimes manifesting in physical symptoms. The extreme nature of a cancer diagnosis can lead to psychological and spiritual strain. Patients internalize this diagnosis and begin to question the intention of the higher power they believe in. The relationship between patients and loved ones are also affected. Patients will need a strong support system to overcome their diagnosis. However, patients take on this new role and fight to return to their original state of health. As a nurse, I take on the role of caretaker for these patients. I specifically provide education on the diagnosed skin conditions related to cancer or cancer treatments and on the medications prescribed to treat these conditions. Patient’s environments quickly begin to incorporate much more time spent at hospitals and doctor’s appointments. Their health goes from disease prevention to disease treatment. My role as a nurse for these patients is to encourage adherence to treatment, provide emotional support, and work closely with patients to treat concerns that will lead to improved health. Our oncodermatology patients are seen on a weekly to monthly basis depending on their needs. Every appointment is an opportunity to evaluate how they are coping with their situation. We use this assessment to determine what nursing interventions will be most beneficial at that time.
There is another clinic in my department called the nurse clinic. The nurse clinic is where patients exclusively see a nurse for their appointment. Nurses provide care for patients such as suture removal, injection teaching, and wound care. Orem’s theory of Self-Care Nursing highlights the dynamic between the patient receiving care and the nurse providing care (Smith, 2020). A common wound care procedure performed in the nurse clinic is unna boot removal and application. The process involves wrapping a patient’s leg with econo paste, kerlix, and coban. Unna boots are a task that requires nursing care due to the location on the patient’s body and special training nurses have for wound care. An example of a self-care deficit that eventually turns into self-care is injections. The patient will have an initial appointment for a biologic injection with the nurse. At this appointment, the nurse will inject the medication and then teach the patient how to inject themselves. After the patient learns how to inject, they use the new information to provide their own care at home. It is rewarding to witness patients taking control of their health, sometimes to the point where they do not require the hands-on nursing care from our clinic.
I chose a research study that investigated how Orem’s self-care deficit theory applied nursing interventions to pediatric cancer patients and their parents. The study aimed to identify self-care tasks children and parents were able to complete andthe nursing interventions necessary for them to complete dependent-care tasks. The study was composed of 9 children with cancer and 18 parents all with varying circumstances. The estimative operations, which establish the nature of the situation included the participants acquiring knowledge and gaining information (Burley Moore & Beckwitt, 2006). The children and parents learned of their initial diagnosis from their healthcare provider. The nursing interventions provided to the families included verbal teaching and supplying information (Burley Moore & Beckwitt, 2006). These interventions gave participants resources such as support groups, tips for managing medical equipment, handouts, books, and pamphlets to expand their understanding of the specific cancer diagnosis. One example given was how a video helped a young patient cope with cancer and learn to not blame herself for her body getting sick (Burley Moore & Beckwitt, 2006). The next nursing interventions assist with transitional operations. The transitional operations are the steps taken to decide a course of action (Dennis, 1997). The healthcare team discusses options with patients and make the necessary referrals. The information gives families knowledge and autonomy to make the right decisions for their situations. The study explores a case where there was a lack of referrals provided. A mother expressed her desire for a psychiatry referral and the benefit it would have had on her child’s mental health. It is our job as nurses to look at the patient as a whole and recognize areas that require a specialist. Lastly, nurses provide motivation to support the productive operations where tasks are completed. An example from the study details a nurse that successfully got her patient to drink her milk by promising her a dance. The findings of the study showed nursing interventions did improve estimative, transitional, and productive operations; however, there were many areas for improvement of nursing interventions (Burley Moore & Beckwitt, 2006). The conclusion emphasizes Orem’s self-care deficit model in practice and ways nurses can apply this model to provide better care for patients.
References
Smith, M. C. (2020).Nursing theories and nursing practice (5th ed.). F.A. Davis.
Burley Moore, J., & Beckwitt, A. E. (2006). Self-Care Operations and Nursing Interventions for Children With Cancer and Their Parents. Nursing Science Quarterly, 19(2), 147-156. doi:10.1177/0894318406286594
Dennis, C. M. (1997).Self-care deficit theory of nursing: Concepts and applications.St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
Hi Everyone,
Our discussion this week is aimed at addressing these POs:
Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO # 2)
Propose strategies for use of relevant theories that nurse leaders can employ in selected healthcare or educational organizations, considering legal and ethical principles. (POs #2, 6)
Key Concept
Role of grand and middle-range nursing theories applied to health care organizations
Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice.
(PO #3)
Key Concept
Grand or middle-range theory applied to a specific area of nursing leadership practice
Recommend strategies for the use of theory as the basis for actions of advanced nursing practice in leadership and education. (PO #5)
Key Concepts
Relationship between leadership and management and theory
Role of theory in developing and applying leadership and management concepts
Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points.
I look forward to your responses.
For this discussion, please answer this question:
Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points.
Participation for MSN
The Threaded Discussion Grading Grid and Rubric document can be found in Course Resources.
Participation Guidelines
Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.
Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.
Requirements:
Description of the Assignment
1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.
The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization
2. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.
The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
3. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
4. For week 8 only: Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.
Posting Requirements:
- The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
- The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
- Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
- The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
- Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
Criteria for Content
- Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
- Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
- Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
- Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
- Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
- Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
- Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
- When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
- Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
Grading Rubric
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance100%16 points | Very good or high level of performance88%14 points | Acceptable level of performance81%13 points | Inadequate demonstration of expectations68%11 points | Deficient level of performance56%9 points | Failing levelof performance55% or less
0 points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
| ScholarlinessDemonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. | Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
|
| Application of Course KnowledgeDemonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations | Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Interactive DialogueInitial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)
Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
|
8 Points |
7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points | 4 Points |
0 Points |
|
| Grammar, Syntax, APAPoints deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition
Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
| 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| ParticipationRequirements | Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.