NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning

Chamberlain University NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning                  

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning                  

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning                  

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning                  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning                  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning Included

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning

Title: NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning

There are so  many different aspects of healthcare and all are essential in providing effective, high quality care. I know that healthcare is rapidly evolving and constantly changing, and all involved must adapt and remain flexible. I feel the problem with my current organization is they are reluctant to change. I work in a more rural area and I have noticed that it is based more on a mechanistic theory. Unfortunately, I have also witnessed why this system is not as effective and I quickly found that there is little opportunity for growth.  I came from a large, advanced organization where opportunities seemed to be endless and I was quickly moving up in the chain, however, I had to move away due to unforeseen circumstances and ended up at my current organization. The differences in the two are very evident. The first organization was a large, trauma 1, magnet hospital with up-to-date technology, great leadership, and was overall a great place to work. My current organization is behind the times, in technology to the type of practice or limited services provided. I feel this organization is reluctant to change and it is with great effort and urgency when any change takes place. I work with very capable and willing people but the organizations lag is preventing everyone from prospering, including the patients we serve. 

I do try to speak up and be a change agent within this organization, and I will continue to do so until it is time for me to move on. I am grateful for the opportunity to see the difference between an advanced and thriving, well established facility compared to a  smaller, unremarkable facility. I feel I know more in regards of what i want and also what to look for in a future place of employment.

This week has contributed immensely to my personal and professional growth. I developed an understanding of the impact of systems theory and complexity science on the role of nurse practitioners. Systems theory and complexity science enables nurse practitioners to understand the interrelationship that exist between and among variables that influence care. The understanding enables them to develop effective care plans that address the variables that affect the health and wellbeing of their patients negatively. Nurse practitioners currently work in environments characterized by highly complex, emerging healthcare problems affecting their populations. Effective management of these conditions require nurse practitioners to adopt care interventions that are dynamic in responding to the ever-changing patient needs (Braithwaite et al., 2018; Pype et al., 2018). In this case, systems theory and complexity science helps nurses to see the whole picture of the different care needs of patients, interaction of variables, and responsive interventions to promote optimum health outcomes for them.  

The week’s activities also exposed me to the different nurse practitioner practice models in healthcare. A reflection of my practice site shows it to adopt the collaborative practice model. The collaborative practice model utilizes healthcare teams, with the nurse practitioners being part of the collaboration team. The nurse practitioner works with other healthcare providers such as physicians and nurses to develop care plans. I am satisfied with the model since it promotes accountability, teamwork, and responsibility among the staff involved in the patient care process (Wei et al., 2020). I believe that the drivers for practice models for advanced practice nursing in my state include the evolving role of nurse practitioners, increasing recognition of nurse practitioner influence on care outcomes, and emerging patient needs that demand responsive care models. The changes in healthcare landscape due to factors such as healthcare policies and technological advancements also increase the need for transformative healthcare models in nursing.

References

Braithwaite, J., Churruca, K., Long, J. C., Ellis, L. A., & Herkes, J. (2018). When complexity science meets implementation science: A theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Medicine, 16(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1057-z

Pype, P., Mertens, F., Helewaut, F., & Krystallidou, D. (2018). Healthcare teams as complex adaptive systems: Understanding team behaviour through team members’ perception of interpersonal interaction. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 570. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3392-3

Wei, H., Corbett, R. W., Ray, J., & Wei, T. L. (2020). A culture of caring: The essence of healthcare interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(3), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1641476

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning

Title: NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning

As I finished the readings and discussions in week five, I learned much about communication and collaboration.  

Are you satisfied with the demonstrated level of interprofessional collaboration?

The notion of collaborative practice is founded on the idea that many different healthcare professionals must contribute their skills to deliver quality patient care. Implementing collaboration is a challenging practice that takes effort, time, and perseverance. This model demonstrates excellent interprofessional partnerships built around the doctor-nurse collaboration. In addition, it requires a grasp of components and organizational structure, and it calls for clinicians, insurers, and administrators to be committed to providing quality healthcare (Willgerodt  & Fleming, 2017).

Briefly consider what appears to be the driving practice model for advanced practice nursing in New Jersey.

The driving practice model is the collaborative practice model. This model considers the advanced nursing practitioner (ANP) a partner on the present care team. The ANP provides complete care to hospitalized patients despite not being the most responsible provider and shares accountability with the medical partner. The stronghold of this model is that it promotes effective collaboration with other physicians, leading to a better healthcare organization, improved patient outcomes, and intercommunication (Willgerodt  & Fleming, 2017).

In New Jersey, ANPs are fully qualified clinicians that can work independently. However, they must prescribe drugs and medical equipment in compliance with an officially authorized joint protocol that has been mutually decided upon and approved by APN’s authorized partnering medic. Health workers from many backgrounds offer medical services, health education, and sickness prevention. Physicians and APNs can improve care together because of their complementary experiences and skill sets.

What might you do to facilitate change if your state lags in its practice model language?

To promote change, parties in collaboration must be comprised of personnel with corresponding and relevant talents to ensure that the appropriate individual is available. The team’s goal, the traits and requirements of the patients, and the workplace environment will all influence the skill mix. All administrative processes should support the collaboration, including budgeting, expense reimbursement, and human resource planning.

References

Willgerodt, M. A., & Fleming, R. (2017). Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and School Nursing: A Model for Improved Health Outcomes. A Scholarly Journal Of the American Nurses Association.

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning

Title: NR 500 Week 5 Reflection on Learning

There are so  many different aspects of healthcare and all are essential in providing effective, high quality care. I know that healthcare is rapidly evolving and constantly changing, and all involved must adapt and remain flexible. I feel the problem with my current organization is they are reluctant to change. I work in a more rural area and I have noticed that it is based more on a mechanistic theory. Unfortunately, I have also witnessed why this system is not as effective and I quickly found that there is little opportunity for growth.  I came from a large, advanced organization where opportunities seemed to be endless and I was quickly moving up in the chain, however, I had to move away due to unforeseen circumstances and ended up at my current organization. The differences in the two are very evident. The first organization was a large, trauma 1, magnet hospital with up-to-date technology, great leadership, and was overall a great place to work. My current organization is behind the times, in technology to the type of practice or limited services provided. I feel this organization is reluctant to change and it is with great effort and urgency when any change takes place. I work with very capable and willing people but the organizations lag is preventing everyone from prospering, including the patients we serve. 

I do try to speak up and be a change agent within this organization, and I will continue to do so until it is time for me to move on. I am grateful for the opportunity to see the difference between an advanced and thriving, well established facility compared to a  smaller, unremarkable facility. I feel I know more in regards of what i want and also what to look for in a future place of employment.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
ScholarlinessDemonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisionsEvaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge -Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real lifeInteractions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real lifeDoes not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson contentDoes not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignoredNo discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive DialogueReplies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.(5 points possible per graded thread)	Exceeds minimum post requirementsReplies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peerSummarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate daysReplies to a question posed by a peerSummarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadlineDoes not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the weekDiscussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the threadNo connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APANote: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format.Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format.Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format.Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format.Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.Writing style does not facilitate communication.The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirementsper discussion thread	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirementper discussion thread	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.