NR 443- RN Community Health Nursing Week 4 Assignment Direct Care Project Part 2 Planning the Presentation

NR 443- RN Community Health Nursing Week 4 Assignment Direct Care Project Part 2 Planning the Presentation

NR 443- RN Community Health Nursing Week 4 Assignment Direct Care Project Part 2 Planning the Presentation

Week 6 Assignment Direct Care Project Part 4 Evaluating the Project

Direct Care Project Part 4

Evaluating the Project

Directions: Use this template to evaluate your project. For more information on the template sections, see the Directions for Part 4 and the Direct Care Part 4 Tutorial.

 

1. Title of presentation _______________________________________

2. Date presentation completed ________________________________

3. Tables of results
   1. Tally the results of your surveys and place the numerical values in the boxes below.

Table 1: PRE-Survey

#	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
1		X
2		X
3			X
4		X
5		X

Table 2: POST-Survey

#	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
1	X
2	X
3	X
4	X
5	X

1. Interpretation of results

1. 1. Summarize Data From The Tables

From table 1, there is an indication that respondent/participants had average understanding of the topic being presented. From the data collected, the respondent agree with different attributes that have been used to measure the level of understanding on the topic. For instance, the respondent/participant consider themselves to be knowledgeable about the cost, requirements, as well as the processes for obtaining clinical participation in their specialty. Respondent are knowledgeable on how nurses with clinical certification can enhance patient outcomes. However, the respondent neither agree nor disagree on how certified nurses can showcase better leadership skills. Finally, from pre-survey, respondent would consider obtaining clinical certification. There is positive changes according to the surveys that have been conducted. From the post-survey table, there is a general improvement in the level of understanding of the topic that have been presented.

1. Reflection

The surveys shows that there is a general improvement in the understanding of the topics that have been presented. From the responses, the post surveys shows the general improvement in the outcomes. The pre and post surveys both reflect the understanding of the respondents on the topics that have been presented (Márquez-Chamorro, Resinas, & Ruiz-Cortés, 2017). More data would have been helpful in the determination of the accurate outcomes. With more data, there could have been an improvement in the project’s outcomes. The generation of more data would rely on the increase of variables which would mean more responses.

There are different barriers that are associated with the project. Going by the survey, both pre-survey and post-survey, limited resources is perceived to be the main barrier while undertaking the project (Meidan et al., 2017). Some of the resources that may be lacking include financial resources to recruit more respondents or study participants to take part in the study process. The developed variables need to be increased to ensure that there is collection of more data and formulation of a larger dataset.

1. Implications for Future Practice

The project has a greater impact on the professional practice. In other words, it aids in the understanding of different aspects or approaches that can be used to understand the level of understanding from the learners or those involved in the educational practices. The project can aids in the provision of different approaches that can be applied in the professional practice. The project is also important in the provision of knowledge that may be applied in the professional practice. Adhering to the guidelines that have been used in the research process is necessary in the professional practices.

References

Márquez-Chamorro, A. E., Resinas, M., & Ruiz-Cortés, A. (2017). Predictive monitoring of business processes: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 11(6), 962-977. Retrieved from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8103817

Meidan, A., García-García, J. A., Escalona, M. J., & Ramos, I. (2017). A survey on business processes management suites. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 51, 71-86. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092054891630040X

Purpose

The purpose of this direct care project is for learners to apply the nursing process to a community health problem determined by their observations and data collected of vulnerable populations in their community. This is Part 4 of 4 in the Direct Care Project.

Direct Care Project Overview

There are four parts to the Direct Care Project.

There will be graded Project Check-ins that correlate to each part.

The topic selected in Part 1 will be the same one used in Parts 2 through 4.

Review the table below for overview and due dates with each topic.

Contact your instructor with questions.

Course Outcomes

This direct care project enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:?

CO2 Assess the health of populations, aggregates, and communities (PO4)

CO3 Apply the nursing process to vulnerable populations with professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice (PO4 & 8)

CO5 Utilize a collaborative approach to address factors that influence population health (PO2)

CO6 Examine collaborative trends in community health nursing (PO2)

Part 4 enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO3 Apply the nursing process to vulnerable populations with professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice (PO4 & 8)

CO5 Utilize a collaborative approach to address factors that influence population health (PO2)

CO6 Examine collaborative trends in community health nursing (PO2).

Directions for Part 4

View the Direct Care Project Part 4 Tutorial (Links to an external site.)

Download the Evaluating the Project template below

Gather the information from the surveys and attendance form.

Complete the template with the following:

Attendance form data

Include names, titles, and organization

Tables of results

PRE-Survey and POST-Survey results in numerical form

Interpretation of results

Summarize data in the tables

Include any positive or negative changes

Reflection

Overall experience

Summary of outcomes from the pre and post surveys

Barriers to the project (i.e. participant interest, time, limited resources, willingness for change, etc.)

Implications for future practice

How could this project impact your personal and professional practice?

Submit the Direct Care Part 4 Evaluating the Project template and the attendance form. The attendance form will be a separate submission in the grades area.

Template

Click on the link below to download your template.

Evaluating the Project Template (Links to an external site.)

Best Practices

Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Use the template provided. If the template is not used, a deduction will be applied. See rubric below.

Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.?

Also Read: NR 443 RN Community Health Nursing Week 4 Assignment   Direct Care Project Part 2 Planning the Presentation

Use the rubric as a final check prior to submission to ensure all content is clearly addressed.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 443- RN Community Health Nursing Week 4 Assignment Direct Care Project Part 2 Planning the Presentation

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.