NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence

Chamberlain University NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence                  

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence                  

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence                  

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence                  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence                  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence Included After Question

The first question asks you to

• Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from one of the study/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.

To clarify, you are not supposed to summarize the findings from THIS study – you are supposed to summarize one of the study findings from within the literature review, and make sure to identify which you are summarizing.

The second question asks you to “Discuss how the author’s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose/problem.” (This means how did Boyle & Thompson’s review of the literature support Boyle & Thompson’s research purpose/question.)

In order to answer the third question, I strongly suggest that you read the required readings in Houser this week.  You really won’t be able to answer the questions without doing so.

There was a slight error in the discussion questions.  The correct reference for the article for this week should be:

Boyle, D. K. , & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study. MEDSURG Nursing, 29(4), 229-254. https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.

Also, a reminder that your week 3 assignment is due this week.  Remember to put the actual PICOT letters into the question.  Also remember that not only your topic but also your INTERVENTION must be an independent nursing function.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence:

Manage Discussion Entry

1. Literature review and summarize by using my own words.

After Conducting a large-number survey, The American Board of Nursing Specialties (ABNS) summarized three top facilitators and barriers of obtaining and maintaining nursing certification (Niebuhr & Biel, 2007).

The top three facilitators are:

• Reimbursement for exam fees
  • Renewal fees
  • Continuing education

 The top three barriers are:

• Cost of the exam
  • Lack of institutional support
  • Lack of time and materials preparing for the exam

• Discuss how the author’s review of studies supported the research problem. Share something that was interesting to me as I read through the literature review section.

Boyle uses Niebuhr’s quantitative study “The value of specialty nursing certification” to support her subject matter. Niebuhr’s survey was done on 8,615 certified nurses from 20 ABNS member organizations (Boyle, 2020). Boyle use Niebuhr’s large-sample study to support her theme. The quantitative study gathers information and analyze the data. The study has no report for response percentages. This type of study is attempting to understand the phenomena (Houser, 2018). I was surprised to the fact that lack of institutional support is one of the top three barriers. I have been working in three different medical organizations, and most of my friends are in nursing field. This has never been a barrier for us.

Describe one strategy that I learned that would help me create a strong literature review/research for evidence. Share my thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.

One strategy I learned that would help me to create a strong literature review/research for evidence is the following. When conducting research, use standard designs, methods, and procedure whenever possible (Houser, 2018). I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research (Houser, 2018). I should use the most recent application literatures as possible. It will help me saving time and having a higher start point. It is also very importance to focus on the research topic and to know designed audiences for the study results. I have learned that besides primary resource information, such as clinical trials; secondary source information, potential search tools that I can trust are CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane central Register of Controlled trails (Houser, 2018).

Reference:

Boyle, D. K., & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study. MEDSURG Nursing, 29(4), 229-254. https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.

Niebuhr, B., & Biel, M. (2007). The value of specialty nursing certification. Nursing Outlook, 55(4), 176-181.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.002Links to an external site.

Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

A Sample Answer 2 NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence

       Question 1

1. Locate the literature review section  Summarize using your own words from one of the study/literature findings.  Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.

I choose to summarize the Research article: Continuing Competencies: There were four categories of literature noted in the study from 2012-2020.  They were Validation, international, and competencies in the disciplines other than nursing.  It was found that some educational sessions that were utilized lacked quality of knowledge, needed.  The study highlighted that professionals might attend cheap and convenient education courses that lacked quality or are not in what particularly necessary in the practice and in greatest need (Boyle2020).  It also stated that participants “may not be to understand, retain, or use the information provided and attendance in the courses does not ensure changes in practice” (Boyle. 2020).  The review discussed several means of continuing competency    methods through publication and professional presentation, portfolios, and performance formal 360 degree assessment. (Boyle. 2020).  The article mentioned simulations on virtual and actual patients are also accepted but felt there was not enough evidence to support  Simulations were used as means of evaluating competence in credentialing and certifying.

  Question 2

 Discuss how the author’s review of literature (studies) supported the research    purpose/problem.  Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.

The research was focused on review of continuing competencies for ensuring certification and credentialing.  The research had four components.  There were 50 or more articles over a time span, so accuracy is evident.  The author quoted Di Leonardi several times.  Di Leonardi was a member of a task force of authors which were sponsored by an organization that has accreditation Board of Specialty Nurse Certification (Leonardi. Et.at. 2019).  “The task force discovered perspectives on continuing competency and found although licensing and credentialing organization addressed the topic thoroughly, little attention has be devoted to the perspectives of individual clinicians, and recipients of clinician services”.  (Leonardi. Et.al 2019).  It was stated by the members of the task force that conducted the study Boyle had did a successful job at contributing research to her review of the studies done by Di Leonardi to address continuing competence by quoting the researcher several times which supported the review.  I found it interesting that the literature review section for continuing competencies didn’t give much merit to using simulation for evaluation  I worked in a    .facility which we had quarterly mock simulation and codes.  It was called over the P.A. system, all necessary departments responded.  We would go the full drill as if it were a real code, then have a debriefing to discuss what could be improved..  This involved nursing, doctors, anesthesia, lab and the house supervisor etc.  I found it quite useful and informative.

Question 3

Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review research for evidence.  Share your thoughts on the importance of a though review of literature.

The strategy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.  Get yourself comfortable with the process, be through in your search don’t be uncomfortable about asking for help.  Don’t try to reinvent the wheel.

Reference

Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study. MEDSURG Nursing, 29(4), 229-254. https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.

 Leonardi, B., Search for more papers by this author, Hagler, D., Marshall, D., Stobinski, J., & Welsh, S. (2019, December 17). From competence to continuing competency. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/00220124-20191217-05Links to an external site.

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence

Title: NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence

I would hopefully achieve this by using libraries if the research is not novice. When writing that statement I was asking myself the same question. After think about it, the evidence I am talking about is primary evidence. Primary evidence is basically an original source of information. These can be documents, diaries, manuscripts, autobiographies, recordings, or any other source of information that was created at the time under study. When thinking back to the Declaration of Independence, for example, it is quite easy to google a PDF of that document. However when researching studies, it is probably more difficult unless the evidence is new. However, although unrelated to the nursing field, going back to Galileo and is theory that all planets revolve around the sun, I can search on the internet for his documents, and I was able to come across a page where Galileo first noted the moons of Jupiter. Although it is in Italian writing, that is still considered a primary evidence of that study. I guess it is very difficult to achieve my concept of finding statements from the researcher themselves, but it is possible with hard work!