NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In

Chamberlain University NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In                     

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In                     

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In                     

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In                     

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In                     

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In Included After Question

NR 394 Transcultural Nursing

Week 4: Course Project Part 2

Check-In

Directions: Prior to completing this template, carefully review Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In Directions paying attention to how to name the document and all rubric requirements.

Your Name: __________________________

Approved specific/ethnic population _Hispanics ________________________

Approved health problem _Obesity and Overweight ________________________

1. Explain any revisions, if required, by the Week 3: Course Project Part 1 faculty feedback. If no revisions were needed, state “None.”

None

• Explain your progress on completing the Week 4: Course Project Part 2 assignment.

            Completion of week 4 task is underway. The information is being gathered from various sources such as class notes, academic journals, internet sources, articles, and other authorized academic sources. Getting information from different sources is essential in continual use and enhancement of my skills (Philippakos, 2018). It is critical to have information targeting effective information on obesity and overweight, especially among the Hispanics. Relevant information on the desired topic, which is obesity issue in Hispanic population, is critical in producing positive outcomes for the current project.

            Personally, I enjoy completing assignments. However, I acknowledge that this assignment can be changed or adjusted constantly. Overall, working on week 4 assignment has been both exciting and challenging experience and I look forward for successful completion and submission.

• Ask at least one question of your instructor that could help you do your best on the Week 4: Course Project Part 2 assignment. 

            It is imperative to determine the rationale and goals for any assignment given by the instructor to help in realizing such goals. Therefore, the possible questions that I can as the instructor to help in best performance in week 4 project include the following.

1. What do I hope to gain from completing the assignment? What knowledge, abilities, and skills does the assignment aim to measure?
2. What is the scope of the project? What areas to will you cover in the weekly assignment?

            This last question is concerned with the determination of the levels of the student. Description of the scope of the project is essential in tailoring of the assignment appropriately for the students’ skill levels. Setting assignment beyond the knowledge of students is challenging is frustrating and can demoralize students (Hussain et al., 2018). Knowing the level of students is vital in determining the direction of assignment and the abilities that the assignment seeks to investigate.

References

Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., & Abidi, S. M. R. (2018). Student engagement predictions in an e-learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6347186

Philippakos, Z. A. (2018). Using a task analysis process for reading and writing assignments. The Reading Teacher, 72(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1690

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In

Title: NR 394 Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In

5. Grading Rubric

Discussion Criteria	 A (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance 	B (87%) Very good or high level of performance	C (76%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance	F (0) Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week. 16 points	Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.16 points	Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.14 points	Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.12 points	Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).0 points
Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.* ( APA format not required) 12 points	Integrates evidence to support your discussion from:assigned readings** OR online lessons, ANDat least one outside scholarly source.***Sources are credited.*12 points	Integrates evidence to support discussion from:assigned readings OR online lesson.Sources are credited.*10 points	Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson.Sources are credited.*9 points	Does not integrate any evidence.0 points
Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week. 14 points	Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.14 points	Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.12 points	Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.10 points	No response post to another student or instructor.0 points
Communicates in a professional manner. 8 points	Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).8 points	Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).7 points	Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).6 points	Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).0 points
PARTICIPATION: Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.	0 points lostStudent posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.		-5 pointsStudent does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.
PARTICIPATION Total posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days.	0 points lostPosts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.		-5 pointsPosts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.
NOTES: * Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required.
** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.
*** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.