NR 393 Week 5 Discussion Evidence-Based Practice Changes

Chamberlain University NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes                     

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes                     

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes                     

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes                     

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes                     

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 393 Week 5 Discussion  Evidence-Based Practice Changes assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 393 Week 5 Discussion Evidence-Based Practice Changes

Nursing in the early part of the 20th century changed drastically from the previous vocation that it had been during most of the 19th century. During this time nursing would see medical advances, changes in nursing education, expansion of public health nursing, promotion of women’s rights, creation of nursing organizations, promotion of hospitals as a better way to provide medical care, two epidemics, and even a world war (Judd & Sitzman, 2014). Many of these events influenced and forever changed how nursing is today. The majority of nurses during this time influenced nursing through political and social reform. This began to change the public’s perception of nursing and the importance of nurses’ roles in society, which gained them a more positive image and allowed nursing to be seen more as a profession.

One area where evidence in nursing care changed during the 20th century is the way of caring for patients today was the development of Intensive Care Units.  This specialty was born in Copenhagen in 1953 where the award was solely dedicated for each patient to have their own nurse in order to treat the polio epidemic in which more than 300 patients per week were being admitted and 10% of them required respiratory support.  By dedicating the award to care for these patients, mortality from polio decreased from 80% to approximately 40% (Kelly, Fong, Hirsch, & Nolan, 2014).

In America, it was not until 1961 that we established the development of Cardiac Care Units to care for the critically ill.  Intensive Care Units that wasn’t just focused on cardiac care followed in the 1970s.  Most hospitals today have nurses in ICU care for 2 patients to focus on improving their overall outcome.  Advances in technology promoted the best healthcare practices which expanded medical expertise (Judd & Sitzman, 2014).  A Registered Nurse meets requirements of preparation and knowledge to practice, but most often choose to specialize in one type sometime in their career.  Specialty nursing certifications indicate the RN possesses a higher level of specific knowledge and expertise, and those working in the ICU setting can obtain a certification as a critical care nurse or CCRN.  This certification was established by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) in 1975.  Having these specialty nursing certifications available to take set the stage today for those seeking a higher level of expertise in a specific field.

References

Judd, D., & Sitzman, K. (2014). A history of American nursing: Trends and eras (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

Kelly, F., Fong, K., Hirsch, N., Nolan, J. (2014). Intensive care medicine is 60 years old: the history and future of the intensive care unit.  Royal College of Physicians Clinical Medicine.  Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4952830

NR393 Nursing History

Week 5 Discussion

Evidence-Based Practice Changes

Purpose:

The purpose of this discussion is for learners to examine one area in the 20th century where evidence has changed practice.

Course Outcomes:

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcome:

CO3: Identify persons and events in nursing history impacting evidence-based practice from the 20th century and 21st century. (PO8)

Directions:

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate scholarly resources

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Also Check Out: NR 393 Week 4 Discussion Impact of 19th Century Nurses

Discussion

The evidence to guide nursing practice has changed greatly during the 20th century. Select one area where evidence in nursing care changed during the 20th century and tell us about it.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 393 Week 5 Discussion Evidence-Based Practice Changes

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Sample Answer 2 for NR 393 Week 5 Discussion Evidence-Based Practice Changes

Great post! It was very informative and gave me the information I hadn’t realized, not so much that I didn’t know, but I have always thought that ICU and Cardiac Care Units came hand and hand. It always amazes me at how truly recent these types of advances in medicine, and the care of the sick, is. Nursing has been around for some time, but we are very much early in our developments in nursing and medicine, and our care of our patients. One example that comes to mind, is how many people we lost early with Covid and on a vent, but today we are seeing a higher survival rate. Somewhere, someone said let’s try laying the patients on their stomachs – and it worked! Having the specialty units is so important for these types of trials and errors, as the nurses can better care for 2 patients who are deathly ill, and they can monitor their status much easier, allowing them to try new ways, and monitor if those different interventions can be successful.

I also did mine on Certification, and how important obtaining one can be. No matter what job we are doing, we need specific education for that role. Whether that role is a chef, a cashier, an environmental service worker, a manager, the CEO of a company – every role has a set of guidelines and rules to be followed in that role. So why should this be different in nursing? One of my favorite things about healthcare is never-ending education and the long list of opportunities. When Nightingale studied to be a nurse, that was it – you stayed by your patients, ensured they, and their living area, was clean and did what the doctor told you to do. Today has that changed! As we all know, medicine is a very deep and complex topic. Every nurse has one aspect of the body, that fascinates them, or an area within the field that does. There is a large difference between an ER nurse and a med/surg nurse, and OR nurse from a flight nurse. We all started with the same education. The pre-requisites, the nursing classes, taking the dreaded NCLEX. However, just like the training for a chef is different than a CEO, so is every aspect of nursing. Certification allows the nurse to be able to obtain more in-depth, and specific, training for that role. The nursing school covers the basics. However, you can’t walk out of the testing center knowing you passed, and jump on a helicopter to be a flight nurse. There is a need for specific training and understanding of policies and procedures when taking care of patients that are critically ill. Certification has many benefits, but in those benefits, there is always a downside. With so much education in a specific area, we tend to forget that there are other aspects that need care as well. I may be great at lung sounds, knowing from the sound what that patient needs now, and what they need long term, for the best chance of lung recovery. However, I don’t know if those interventions will affect another aspect of their care. For example, if I specialize in respiratory and hear nasty lung sounds, I’m going to start antibiotics, maybe some steroids, a diuretic. However, I don’t know what their skin is like – and implementing certain medications can actually make that patient worse in terms of their skin. As with anywhere in medicine, this is another example of the true importance of collaboration with the entire team, especially in a critically ill patient. Of course, there is also the time and money spent on obtaining the certification, and the maintenance of keeping it active.