NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems

Chamberlain University NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems                     

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems                     

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems                     

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems                     

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems                     

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems Included

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems

Title: NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems

Share your experiences with healthcare information systems, past or present.

   In the more than 20 years I have been an R.N. at the bedside and I have seen many transitions with a wide variety of information-sharing systems. When I was a new grad in 1999 the primary form of documentation was paper charting. I remember when the Care Plans became computerized and I thought it was such a great tool that not only helped me be more efficient at my patient care but also more thorough. Fast Forward to 2019, my hospital decided to invest in the transition to Epic. Epic was not only the first HIS that I was able to experience from its initial launch, but it was also the first system I was officially trained on. Before that, in my career, I had encountered various healthcare information systems, and many seemed to be pieced together. I can not recall being formally trained on any of the other systems. Since much of my career I was either Registry or Float Pool, the expectation was that you just come in and do it. I can see the value on how much more effective I can be at my profession when I can utilize all the functions and tools available to me through my HIS. I felt more confident during the launch of the Epic program after the training classes. The administration saw the value to invest the time and money in our computer training environment. I had work shifts switched to classroom days and paid practice time with created patient scenarios. The instructors were very patient and helpful in the process. After we launched there was a superuser assigned on every unit for months to answer questions and assist. According to Hebda (2019), “Education is the key to the successful use of an information system” (p. 229). It would have been a challenging transition without the training especially since it is a holistic program, and everything is run on that one system. The benefits of all the interdisciplinary communication on one system are very helpful for safe quality and efficient patient care delivery. In the past, my patient charts were run on various programs, for instance, the MD orders were in one place, pharmacy and nutrition in another place, and even central supply and infection prevention would be accessed from an entirely different system. I had multiple passwords and had to go in and out of systems remembering which password was for which system. During an emergent situation, this could be challenging and delay patient care. Sometimes I was the only safety check. Now I can text a physician in the middle of the night on my work iPhone with the Engage app regarding arrhythmia. For example, they can access the patient’s chart with real-time data and send the pharmacy order for an antidysrhythmic appropriate for the scenario after careful consideration of the real-time data. I can initiate the drug very quickly and many times this efficiency is the key to break that rhythm quickly and therefore better patient outcomes. In emergent situations, I just simply scan my badge in and everything I need is at my fingertips. There are safeguards for these scenarios built right in. Allergy lists and hemodynamics are available for the physician to make the appropriate med choices or verify my recommendations. In my electronic MAR, we have a Lexicomp link that is the medication information at a click of a button if I am unfamiliar with medication or just need a quick review. It also has quick print access for patient education. I have a quick link to patient home medication lists so that I can follow up and reinforce changes related to the medication plan of care. I have used this list to inform the physician that perhaps a beta-blocker or anticoagulant from home has not been resumed during the hospital stay, possibly preventing an arrhythmia or a stroke to develop. This might be an area in which the program can improve in the future, new alerts are being developed and embedded for more safeguards all the time. Nursing has a unique perspective to contribute to this area. The program is a wonderful system, but improvements can continue to be made. I would like to see a link from the physician’s orders to send auto-generated messages to central supply for example. This would save time on the extra step of messaging and the follow up with central supply for specific supplies ordered for the patient. We have a Nursing I.T. department and they are always taking suggestions, working diligently to help improve and update our system. David Bates (2019) discussed how these programs are set up with safeguards, but there is still a lot that slips through the cracks because these are universally vendor developed as opposed to customized specifically to the facility. Nursing will always have continued contributions to the safeguards with patient care technology for the simple fact that patient care and pathways for treatment are always changing.

References

Bates, D. W. (2019). Getting Over the Hump: Realizing Benefit from Clinical Decision Support in Electronic Health Records. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 45(11), 719–721. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.08.007

Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar, P. (2019). Handbook of informatics for nurses & healthcare professionals (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems

Title: NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems

Share your experiences with healthcare information systems, past or present. Has it been an easy transition or difficult? Why do you believe your experience has been positive or negative? If you are currently not working in a healthcare setting, how has the medical record exposure in nursing school impacted your current knowledge?

I have worked in a variety of healthcare settings throughout my career before I became a nurse. You could even consider lifeguarding part of healthcare because I was CPR certified, although I didn’t ever have to document anything or save anyone. I worked in a doctor’s office for a few years while I was starting school. This office was private practice, so they didn’t have an electronic documenting system. All the charts were paper, and they were very heavy! If I took a call from a patient, I had to find their chart in the files and hand write what they needed and give it to the doctor for him to reply. I learned spelling and medical terms very quickly! Although this system mostly worked for their needs, I sometimes found other patients results in others charts. Every result was faxed to us and sorted and filed by hand. Therefore, a lot of mistakes were made and there wasn’t a great way to monitor that the correct papers were getting into the correct charts. If a specific result was lost, there was really no way to find out where it went, we would just have to have another copy faxed. Thankfully while I was there nothing catastrophic happened, but with no safeguards in place, it’s really only a matter of time. In a study comparing electronic documentation verses conventional (paper) charting, this found that the electronic documenting showed more diagnoses for each patient, less false or redundant ICD codes, and less time spent on documenting (Stengel, Bauwens, Martin, Kopfer, & Ekkernkamp, 2004). Improper or false ICD billing codes can get you in a lot of trouble, even if you’re not doing in on purpose. Medicare fraud is highly monitored and can negatively affect a physician’s medical license. Not to mention the potential repercussions for the patient receiving wrong information and potentially having to pay more money unnecessarily.

I found the transition from that old paper system to an electronic system to be very smooth. I often felt like I lacked detail in some instances and I know how important documenting is. But the amount of time I spent hand writing requests in the chart took away from the amount of detail I could put into it. I was already spending extra time after the office closed to call back the patients who had called that day, I didn’t have any extra time to write more. I can type a lot faster than I can write, so an electronic system would have really helped streamline this office. I understand how expensive it can be to convert, so I realize why they never changed over. I used Epic documenting now and I could not imagine what it would be like to try and document a hospital patient with a pencil and paper. I already spend a lot of time charting, I feel like I would never get the amount of detail necessary while trying to hand write all my documentation.

Stengel, D., Bauwens, K., Martin, W., Kopfer, T., & Ekkernkamp, A. (2004). Comparison of Handheld Computer-Assisted and Conventional Paper Chart Documentation of Medical Records: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 86(3), 553-560.

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems

Title: NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems

My experience with different healthcare information systems is limited because I have only worked at one hospital. When I started at this hospital, the physicians were still hand-writing orders and progress notes. They had already integrated a basic electronic charting system called Meditech, for the nurses to chart and the secretaries to transcribe the hand-written documentation from the physicians. In 2013, my hospital converted to all electronic medical records and overall it was an easy transition. As a 19-year-old, computers and new applications did not scare me. But I believe the sudden implementation of this system forced some of the older physicians and nurses out of the hospital setting. My experience with healthcare information systems has been positive. According to our textbook, Electronic Health Records have the ability to “add decision support and flag potentially dangerous drug interactions, verify medications, and reduce the needs for risky tests and procedures” (Hebda, Hunter, & Czar, 2019, p. 119). One example of how this feature has helped me is when I have patients who are receiving IV Furosemide, the system will alert me if the patient’s last Potassium level was low and it has not been re-drawn recently. The government was a driving force in the implementation of electronic healthcare information systems. In 2009 President Barack Obama signed a piece of legislation called the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. This act provided more than $35 billion to hospitals and clinics to encourage the use of Electronic Health Records (Reisman, 2017).

References

Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar, P. (2019). Handbook of informatics for nurses & healthcare professionals (6th ed.). Pearson.

Reisman M. (2017). EHRs: The Challenge of Making Electronic Data Usable and Interoperable. P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 42(9), 572–575.

Share your experiences with healthcare information systems, past or present. Has it been an easy transition or difficult? Why do you believe your experience has been positive or negative? If you are currently not working, how has the medical record exposure in nursing school impacted your current knowledge?

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 361 Week 2: Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems

APA Writing Checklist

Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate

program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.

☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.

☐  The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ Topic is well defined.

☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.

☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.

☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.

☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.

Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.

Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.

Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.

Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.

Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.

☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.

My experience with healthcare information systems has been generally good. When I started in oncology I would have utterly failed if it was not for healthcare information systems. When I am doing telephone triage, I have everything on the internet at my fingertips. Having access to all of this allows me to answer patient questions in real time. If I am uncertain if a certain adverse event patient is experiencing is expected with the particular medication he or she is on, I can simply look up the package insert for the drug and quickly find out. According to Hebda, “an information system, at its simplest, is a combination of computer hardware and software that can process data into information to solve a problem” (2019, p.135).  I use these sorts of systems daily in my nursing career. My current EMR comes with free access to UpToDate. If I need to know anything about a drug, I can simply click the link and it will take me to page regarding that drug. I utilize NCCN template guidelines when building new regimens into our EMR, I can easily trend and graph a patients’ tumor marker with a click of a button providing the patient with a visual, easy to read snapshot of how their treatment is working for them. It seems the benefits are endless yet there is some apprehension when it comes to implementing new systems.

All transitions are difficult. Implementing a new EMR is especially difficult. I have gone through a full EMR change and am now working on yet another. There is no perfect system and the learning curve is always step. Ljubicic et. al. explains some of the challenges facing these types of transitions are including but not limited to limited staff, budget concerns, and the fact that the work force is aging and my not be as tech savvy as a younger workforce. This all the in setting that patients expect us to be cutting edge and provide the most up to date, quality care possible (Ljubicic et. al., 2020).  Each new system is advertised as the “best out there” yet there is no perfect system for anyone. Add on that these systems must constantly update to stay cutting edge means that you sometimes have to relearn how to use them. I can see how there is apprehension. The nature of my position puts me central in the development/transition to a new system. Working with these companies that have developed a program a certain way that they assume works for everyone is difficult at times. They are often not clinicians and do not understand why their prescribed workflow does not work for our particular office/specialty. It is a battle and a stress particularly when it seems we are speaking different languages. It’s a high stakes game. Our clinic works as a well-oiled machine to keep up with the demands of patients; if a new EMR does not help us increase efficiency then it is useless to us. I must ensure that proper workflows are in place before we go live. We know that these healthcare information systems can help us improve care but I can also see how it can have negative outcomes as well.

Also Check Out: NR 361 Week 3: Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics