NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
Chamberlain University NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How to Write the Body for NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems Included After Question
Share your experiences with healthcare information systems, past or present. Has it been an easy transition or difficult? Why do you believe your experience has been positive or negative? If you are currently not working in a healthcare setting, how has the medical record exposure in nursing school impacted your current knowledge?
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
Title: NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
I have worked in a variety of healthcare settings throughout my career before I became a nurse. You could even consider lifeguarding part of healthcare because I was CPR certified, although I didn’t ever have to document anything or save anyone. I worked in a doctor’s office for a few years while I was starting school. This office was private practice, so they didn’t have an electronic documenting system. All the charts were paper, and they were very heavy! If I took a call from a patient, I had to find their chart in the files and hand write what they needed and give it to the doctor for him to reply. I learned spelling and medical terms very quickly! Although this system mostly worked for their needs, I sometimes found other patients results in others charts. Every result was faxed to us and sorted and filed by hand. Therefore, a lot of mistakes were made and there wasn’t a great way to monitor that the correct papers were getting into the correct charts. If a specific result was lost, there was really no way to find out where it went, we would just have to have another copy faxed. Thankfully while I was there nothing catastrophic happened, but with no safeguards in place, it’s really only a matter of time. In a study comparing electronic documentation verses conventional (paper) charting, this found that the electronic documenting showed more diagnoses for each patient, less false or redundant ICD codes, and less time spent on documenting (Stengel, Bauwens, Martin, Kopfer, & Ekkernkamp, 2004). Improper or false ICD billing codes can get you in a lot of trouble, even if you’re not doing in on purpose. Medicare fraud is highly monitored and can negatively affect a physician’s medical license. Not to mention the potential repercussions for the patient receiving wrong information and potentially having to pay more money unnecessarily.
I found the transition from that old paper system to an electronic system to be very smooth. I often felt like I lacked detail in some instances and I know how important documenting is. But the amount of time I spent hand writing requests in the chart took away from the amount of detail I could put into it. I was already spending extra time after the office closed to call back the patients who had called that day, I didn’t have any extra time to write more. I can type a lot faster than I can write, so an electronic system would have really helped streamline this office. I understand how expensive it can be to convert, so I realize why they never changed over. I used Epic documenting now and I could not imagine what it would be like to try and document a hospital patient with a pencil and paper. I already spend a lot of time charting, I feel like I would never get the amount of detail necessary while trying to hand write all my documentation.
Stengel, D., Bauwens, K., Martin, W., Kopfer, T., & Ekkernkamp, A. (2004). Comparison of Handheld Computer-Assisted and Conventional Paper Chart Documentation of Medical Records: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 86(3), 553-560.
Actually, now that you mention it, I think I remember the doctors mentioning something about paying fines but it was still less money than the cost of transitioning. I wonder if that was related to this incentive. Like all government policies, they work until they don’t work! Their best option to transition without having to pay so much was to join a larger company that would transfer the records for them. That’s what they ended up doing when it was all said and done. I don’t know what the deal was behind the scenes, but they now are no longer a private practice and they work for a larger company. That wasn’t their ideal move, but it was the best for them in the long run. One of the 4 did decide to go to another company, but the other 3 stayed together in the new practice.
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
Title: NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
My experience with healthcare information systems has been generally good. When I started in oncology I would have utterly failed if it was not for healthcare information systems. When I am doing telephone triage, I have everything on the internet at my fingertips. Having access to all of this allows me to answer patient questions in real time. If I am uncertain if a certain adverse event patient is experiencing is expected with the particular medication he or she is on, I can simply look up the package insert for the drug and quickly find out. According to Hebda, “an information system, at its simplest, is a combination of computer hardware and software that can process data into information to solve a problem” (2019, p.135). I use these sorts of systems daily in my nursing career. My current EMR comes with free access to UpToDate. If I need to know anything about a drug, I can simply click the link and it will take me to page regarding that drug. I utilize NCCN template guidelines when building new regimens into our EMR, I can easily trend and graph a patients’ tumor marker with a click of a button providing the patient with a visual, easy to read snapshot of how their treatment is working for them. It seems the benefits are endless yet there is some apprehension when it comes to implementing new systems.
All transitions are difficult. Implementing a new EMR is especially difficult. I have gone through a full EMR change and am now working on yet another. There is no perfect system and the learning curve is always step. Ljubicic et. al. explains some of the challenges facing these types of transitions are including but not limited to limited staff, budget concerns, and the fact that the work force is aging and my not be as tech savvy as a younger workforce. This all the in setting that patients expect us to be cutting edge and provide the most up to date, quality care possible (Ljubicic et. al., 2020). Each new system is advertised as the “best out there” yet there is no perfect system for anyone. Add on that these systems must constantly update to stay cutting edge means that you sometimes have to relearn how to use them. I can see how there is apprehension. The nature of my position puts me central in the development/transition to a new system. Working with these companies that have developed a program a certain way that they assume works for everyone is difficult at times. They are often not clinicians and do not understand why their prescribed workflow does not work for our particular office/specialty. It is a battle and a stress particularly when it seems we are speaking different languages. It’s a high stakes game. Our clinic works as a well-oiled machine to keep up with the demands of patients; if a new EMR does not help us increase efficiency then it is useless to us. I must ensure that proper workflows are in place before we go live. We know that these healthcare information systems can help us improve care but I can also see how it can have negative outcomes as well.
Reference:
Hebda, T., Hunter, K. & Czar, P. (2019). Handbook of Informatics for Nurses & Healthcare Professionals 6th edition. Pearson. New York, NY.
Ljubicic, V., Ketikidis, P., & Lazuras, L. (2020). Drivers of intentions to use healthcare information systems among health and care professionals. Health Informatics Journal 26(1). p. 56-71.
http://dx.doi.org.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1460458218813629Links to an external site.
A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
Title: NR 361 Week 2 Discussion Topic, Experiences With Healthcare Information Systems
In the surgical environment where I have worked for the last 15 years, the change from paper charting to computer charting was a long time coming. We heard about years before it actually happened. We were nervous about not being able to access surgeon preference cards more than actual charting a surgery. Funny how the surgeons scare us more than new technology. The transition to EPIC which is the system that my hospital is on was very smooth. The charting itself is easier and legibility doesn’t come into play. Having immediate access to information shared from the patient’s primary care physician or surgeon’s office is very beneficial. This information crosses over into our patient’s chart saving time hunting for it. Immediate access to a patient’ s allergies, lab results, radiology reports, prior surgeries, health history and current medications can be life saving in an emergency.
My experience was a positive one because I was so looking forward to it coming to our hospital. I signed up to be a super user in my department and that helped to make me comfortable quickly. In the OR, this electronic documentation provides functions to manage surgical scheduling which helps to minimize the costs of unused OR time. Other important functions are perioperative nursing and anesthesia documentation, tissue tracking, integration of medical devices, supply management, and real-time displays of ongoing OR activity. (Hebda, 2019, pg. 138) Electronic documentation has helped to improve the care we provide as well as our patient outcomes.
References
Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar, P. (2019). Handbook of informatics for nurses & healthcare professionals (6th ed.). Pearson.
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.