Chamberlain University NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation                     

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation                     

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation                     

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation                     

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation                     

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation Included After Question

This assignment is due this week.

Click here to download the assignment guidelinesLinks to an external site..

Click here to download the PowerPoint Links to an external site.template.

Week 1: Connecting the Concepts

Reflective Activity

This reflective activity will help you transfer the things you’ve learned into long-term memory. You are encouraged to review this information as you continue learning to promote content mastery and faster retrieval of information for application.

This week you learned about development, including assessment of a pediatric client, health promotion, pain and family dynamics.

Connecting This Week to Previous Learning

• Following class, review your notes and the key concepts of development, health promotion, pain and family dynamics.
• Compare what you learned this week to your prior course(s). What did you learn before that you can connect to this week’s concepts? For example, you learned about anticipatory guidance and the five pediatric lifespan groups. What did you learn about patient education and the developmental milestones in your health and wellness course? How can you apply that to this week’s concepts of development and family dynamics?
• You also learned about health promotion in the pediatric population, especially about disease and injury prevention, leading health indicators, and cultural influences on health. Can you identify three priority lifestyle changes to consider to restore health, maintain current health status, or achieve a new level of health and wellness?
• For each lifestyle change you identified, describe how the change will help the client’s current or future health status.

Preparing to Learn Next Week

• Outline the priority steps you completed to prepare for class.
• Identify what went well with your class preparation.
• Describe two ways your class preparations were beneficial to your learning.
• Describe how you will incorporate what you have learned in class to clinical.
• Determine what you would like to do differently with your preparation for next week.
• Determine what you would like to do differently in the care you provided to clients from this week to next.

Rubric

NR328 Ethical Dilemma Debate

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism1. Team members are professionally dressed. 2. Team is introduced and assigned roles are identified prior to starting the debate. 3. Full group participation. 4. Respectful and professional language is used throughout the debate. 5. Adhere to the time limit of 15 minutes for the debate.	5 ptsHighest PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 5 requirements for section.4 ptsHigh PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 4 requirements for section.3 ptsSatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.2 ptsUnsatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.0 ptsNot PresentIncludes 1 or no requirements for section.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDebateRequired criteria 1. The opposing positions debated are made clear. 2. Argue the issue from a Pro position crediting a supporting scholarly source. 3. Argue the issue from a Con position crediting a supporting scholarly source. 4. Present arguments in a clear and articulate manner. 5. Use appropriate ethical principle(s) to support each position. 6. Consider which, if any, ethical principles are in conflict with the opposing positions. 7. Use three (3) provisions of the ANA Code of Ethics that apply to the ethical dilemma. 8. Discuss possible outcomes of each position being argued. 9. Present a plan for resolving the issue (for patient, family and the nurse).	50 ptsHighest PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 9 requirements for section.40 ptsHigh PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 8 requirements for section.30 ptsSatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 7 requirements for section.20 ptsUnsatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 6 requirements for section.0 ptsNot PresentIncludes 5 or fewer requirements for section.	50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePost-Debate Discussion1. Elicit questions from the class after the debate. 2. Respond professionally and appropriately to questions from the class and faculty. 3. Include concluding remarks by moderator.	15 ptsHighest PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.7 ptsSatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.5 ptsUnsatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 1 requirements for section.0 ptsNot PresentNo requirements for this section presented.	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint1. Title page 2. Brief description of the assigned case 3. Ethical dilemma the case presents 4. Ethical principles that relate to the case 5. Three (3) provisions from the ANA code of Ethics that apply to the case 6. Possible outcomes 7. Plan for resolving the dilemma 8. At least 2 sources used to support work 9. Reference page 10. 10-12 slides (Do not exceed 12 slides)	20 ptsHighest PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 10 requirements for section.15 ptsHigh PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 9 requirements for section.10 ptsSatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 8 requirements for section.5 ptsUnsatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 7 requirements for section.0 ptsNot PresentIncludes 6 or fewer requirements for section.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Organization1. References are submitted with assignment. 2. Uses current APA format and is free of errors. 3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors. 4. At least three (3) scholarly, nursing, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided 5. One (1) scholarly source must be the ANA Code of Ethics Provisions and each position must be supported by a scholarly source.	10 ptsHighest PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 5 requirements for section.8 ptsHigh PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 4 requirements for section.6 ptsSatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.4 ptsUnsatisfactory PerformanceIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.0 ptsNot PresentIncludes 1 or fewer requirements for section.	10 pts
Total Points: 100

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation

Title: NR 328 Week 1: RUA: Ethical Dilemma Debate Preparation