Capella University NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills                         

The introduction for the Capella University NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills

NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills

Applying Research Skills: Limited Access to Healthcare

Equitable access to healthcare for all is important for the realization of optimum health outcomes globally. However, most of the populations in America currently experience challenges in accessing the care that they need because of factors such as cost, geographical location, and shortage of physicians in remote locations. Nurses and other healthcare providers should be proactively involved in implementing responsive strategies to address the limited access to healthcare for the diverse populations. The incorporation of novel technologies such as telemedicine could help overcome this problem in healthcare.

As a nurse, I am responsible for ensuring the promotion and protection of diverse population’s right to access high-quality, safe and efficient care. A recent experience with a diabetic patient elevated my understanding of the severe impacts that limited access to healthcare has on patients and their significant others. The patient was elderly, residing in a rural setting and had diabetic foot. He had not received diabetes care for the last two months because of the distance to specialized care, unaffordable care, and lack of diabetes specialists in her location. As a result, he came with a septic, diabetic wound and hyperglycemia, requiring his admission to the hospital for further management. This experience raised my interest on the use of telemedicine to address limited access to healthcare for different populations.

Identifying Academic Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles

A search for relevant literature on the effectiveness of telemedicine in reducing limited access to healthcare was performed in different databases. They included PubMed, ProQuest Central, CINAHL, and EBSCO. The keywords that were used in the process included telemedicine, telemedicine and access to healthcare, telemedicine and eliminating barriers in healthcare, and telemedicine efficacy in healthcare. The search was only limited to peer-reviewed journals that focused on medicine or nursing and published within the last five years in English language.

Assessing Credibility and Relevance of Information Sources

The credibility of sources of research data must be established. I ensured that the selected articles for the project were published within the last five years to ensure the evidence was relevant to the practice. I also selected articles published by authors with extensive experience in nursing and medical fields. I also read the abstracts to eliminate articles that did not answer or focus on the research topic.

Annotated Bibliography

McLendon, S. F., Wood, F. G., & Stanley, N. (2019). Enhancing diabetes care through care coordination, telemedicine, and education: Evaluation of a rural pilot program. Public Health Nursing, 36(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12601

The above study evaluated the effectiveness of telemedicine, care coordination and education in enhancing diabetes care. The researchers used patients with glycated hemoglobin of more than 8% where the interventions included telemedicine endocrinology consults, nurse care management, and education about diabetes self-management. The aim was to determine the effect of these interventions on diabetes management and complication prevention. The results of this study showed that the interventions led to statistically significant reduction in A1C, improvements in diabetes self-management scores, reduced hospital utilization, and strong participant satisfaction. The interventions also reduced inpatient costs by 96% and emergency department costs by 51.4%. The authors concluded the effectiveness of telemedicine, care coordination, and education in improving access to healthcare for patients with diabetes. The article was included in this annotated review because it shows the effectiveness of telemedicine in reducing challenges in accessing healthcare for the vulnerable populations.

Harkey, L. C., Jung, S. M., Newton, E. R., & Patterson, A. (2020). Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth in Rural Settings: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 12(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2020.6303

The above study is a systematic review that evaluated patients’ reports of their satisfaction with telehealth in rural settings. The researchers compared outcomes in the selected studies with standard in-person therapy. The researchers utilized articles that were obtained from databases that included MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PsychINFO. The search yielded four articles that met the inclusion criteria and were used in the research. The study results demonstrated that the use of telehealth resulted in high satisfaction levels in all the included studies. The authors concluded that telehealth is an effective intervention that can be used to increase healthcare access in rural communities. In addition, it is feasible for use since it has a high rate of acceptability among the rural dwellers. The study was included in this review because it provides insights into the potentials of telehealth in reducing challenges in accessing healthcare as well as the level of acceptability among the disadvantaged, including those residing in rural areas.

Palozzi, G., Schettini, I., & Chirico, A. (2020). Enhancing the Sustainable Goal of Access to Healthcare: Findings from a Literature Review on Telemedicine Employment in Rural Areas. Sustainability, 12(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083318

The above study is a literature review on telemedicine use in rural areas. The study aimed at examining the ways in which telemedicine can be used in the modern world to enhance the sustainable goal of increase access to healthcare. The researchers noted that telemedicine is an effective solution for those living in rural areas because of the lack of healthcare infrastructure that limit their inclusion in the universal healthcare coverage for specialist care. The authors performed a literature review of the existing studies to identify the different telemedicine strategies used to address challenges in accessing healthcare and their sustainability. The analysis of results from the selected studies showed that telemedicine improved both diagnostic and emergency cares in rural areas. It also reduces the cost of healthcare services, increase quality of care outcomes, and expands specialist care coverage. Therefore, the authors recommend the consideration of telemedicine as among the strategies used by the global nations to expand access to healthcare. This article was selected for this review because it shows the benefits of telemedicine on increasing healthcare access. It also shows that telemedicine is a sustainable solution to limited access to healthcare.

Jordan, D. N., Jessen, C. M., & Ferucci, E. D. (2021). Views of Patients and Providers on the Use of Telemedicine for Chronic Disease Specialty Care in the Alaska Native Population. Telemedicine and E-Health, 27(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0284

The above study aimed at understanding provider and patient perspectives on the benefits, barriers, and best uses of video telemedicine in chronic disease specialty care in an Alaska Native Medical Center. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken after a brief survey. The analysis of data from the participants showed that the greatest benefit of telemedicine was reducing travel and related costs. It also perceived an appropriate condition for managing chronic conditions that required specialist care. The authors recommended the incorporation of telemedicine into the care of the underserved populations to enhance healthcare access. This article was included in the review because it explores the benefits, potential barriers, and best uses of telemedicine in enhancing access to healthcare for all.

Learning from Research

I learned several aspects related to telemedicine for use in addressing limited access to healthcare. First, the studies expanded my understanding of the patient and provider experiences with telemedicine. I learned that patients and providers have a high level of satisfaction using telemedicine to deliver virtual, specialized care. I also learned about the immense benefits of telemedicine to those suffering from chronic illnesses. This includes the reduction of healthcare costs, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations, which enhance the productivity of the affected populations (Harkey et al., 2020; McLendon et al., 2019; Palozzi et al., 2020). I also developed my research knowledge and skills, which I can apply in examining and addressing issues that affect access to healthcare in my community.

 

 

References

Harkey, L. C., Jung, S. M., Newton, E. R., & Patterson, A. (2020). Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth in Rural Settings: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 12(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2020.6303

Jordan, D. N., Jessen, C. M., & Ferucci, E. D. (2021). Views of Patients and Providers on the Use of Telemedicine for Chronic Disease Specialty Care in the Alaska Native Population. Telemedicine and E-Health, 27(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0284

McLendon, S. F., Wood, F. G., & Stanley, N. (2019). Enhancing diabetes care through care coordination, telemedicine, and education: Evaluation of a rural pilot program. Public Health Nursing, 36(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12601

Palozzi, G., Schettini, I., & Chirico, A. (2020). Enhancing the Sustainable Goal of Access to Healthcare: Findings from a Literature Review on Telemedicine Employment in Rural Areas. Sustainability, 12(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083318

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the
grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each
point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level
descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

For this assessment, you will research best practices
related to a current health care problem. Your selected problem or issue will
be utilized again in Assessment 3. To explore your chosen topic, you should use
the first two steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach as described on
Campus to aid your critical thinking.

View the Assessment Topic Areas media piece linked in the
Resources and select one of the health care problems or issues in the media
piece to research. Write a brief overview of the selected topic. In your
overview:

Describe the health care problem or issue.

Describe your interest in the topic.

Describe any professional experience you have with this
topic.

Conduct a search for scholarly or academic peer-reviewed
literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search
for articles, including the names of the databases you used.

You will want to access the applicable Undergraduate Library
Research Guide related to your degree (found at the NHS Learner Success Lab)
for tips to help you in your search.

Use keywords related to the health care problem or issue you
are researching to select relevant articles.

Assess the credibility of the information sources you find.

Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed
journal.

Determine if the publication is current.

Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed
journal article is still relevant.

Select four current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed
journal articles published during the past three to five years that relate to
your topic.

Explain the relevance of the information sources.

Describe how the health care problem or issue is addressed
in each source.

Discuss what kind of contribution each source provides on
your selected topic.

Analyze the scholarly literature or academic peer-reviewed
journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.

The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a
list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about
the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will
create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic.

List the full reference for the source in APA format
(author, date, title, publisher, et cetera) and use APA format for the
annotated bibliography.

Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order,
are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.

Follow the reference with the annotation.

In your annotation:

Identify the purpose of the article.

Summarize the source:

What are the main arguments?

What topics are covered?

Include the conclusions and findings of the article.

Write your annotation in a paragraph form. The annotation
should be approximately 150 words (1 to 3 paragraphs) in length.

In a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper,
summarize what you learned from your research.

List the main points you learned about.

Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose
and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example,
linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea
of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Additional Requirements

Length: At least 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not
including the title page and reference page.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

APA Template: Use the APA Style Paper Template as the paper
format and the APA Style Paper Tutorial for guidance. See the Resources for
these documents.

Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with
correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.

Content: Provide a title page and reference page following
APA style.

References: Use at least four scholarly or academic
peer-reviewed journal articles.

APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text
citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference
page.

Turnitin: Submit your assessment to Turnitin prior to
grading. Then, only submit your final assessment to faculty for grading.

Note: Review the Applying Research Skills Scoring Guide for
the grading criteria applied to this assessment.

If you would like assistance in organizing your assessment,
or if you simply have a question about your assessment, please do not hesitate
to ask your courseroom instructor or the teaching assistants in the NHS Learner
Success Lab for guidance and suggestions.

NHS4000 –
Developing a Health Care Perspective.

Assessment

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NHS 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Also Read:  NHS 4000 Developing a Health Care Perspective All Assessments Tasks 

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.