NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493

Grand Canyon University NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493 assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493 depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493                         

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493 is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493 assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493 Included After Question

Topic 3 DQ 2

Name two different methods for evaluating evidence. Compare and contrast these two methods.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493

Title:  NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493

There are various different methods for evaluating evidence. The two main methods are categorized as quantitative and qualitative methods of evaluating evidence. Quantitative methods involve the use of assessing and collecting data in numerical forms. This includes but is not restricted to calculating standard deviation, mean or average, Mann Whitney tests etc (Quantitative research and analysis: Quantitative methods overview, 2021). This form of data is measurable and is more easily able to use to predict a pattern or finding. Most research and experiments conducted in nursing, research, and other fields involve the collection of quantitative data and quantitative methods of research because it is more reliable and straight forward than qualitative tests. Qualitative methods and analyze data based on qualitative categories such as experiences, perceptions, observations, and processes rather than numerical data that shows cause and effect. This type of methos is useful when trying to find a correlation and especially important between a physician and patients. The patient presents qualitative data like how they’re feeling, where the pain is from, and what type of pain they are in along with other symptoms they are experiencing so that the physician can use these qualitative data points to match the disease that is typically linked with the symptoms that the patient is also exhibiting. Whereas, in the context of a patient and physician, the patients reporting of how many times they have went to the restroom, their caloric intake, and other information like weight, height, body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate etc. are all forms of quantitative data. The pros of qualitative research are that it allows for flexibility and creativity because the scope of the project is continuously changing as more data is collected. While there are benefits, cons of qualitative research include the fact that they are very open to interpretation and therefore very subjective. This allows for a greater amount of bias which includes participant bias and researcher bias which will compromise the reliability and accuracy of the experiment as a whole. Qualitative research is also conducted on smaller sample sizes because data collection is usually longer and more tedious with more costs. As for quantitative research, pros include the fact that data is objective, and bias is much more limited than in qualitative studies. Data collected from quantitative methods can also be collected a lot easier and communicated through data sheets, statistics, charts, and graphs which make it simpler to follow. Unlike qualitative data, new technology and software systems can easily compute data and manipulate it to isolated variables that the researcher is looking for to find a cause and effect. While there are benefits, the cons of quantitative research include that it is very restrictive and there is one clear answer rather than participants being allowed to elaborate on their answers for more context. Furthermore, analysis of statistics gathered in quantitative research calls for a much larger pool of participants. Both qualitative and quantitative research seek to find correlations in the collected data and both are significant in disproving existing theories, creating new ones, and elaborating on ones that already exist (Hoover, 2021).

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493 

Hoover, L. (2021). What is qualitative vs. Quantitative Study? GCU. Retrieved May 7, 2022, from https://www.gcu.edu/blog/doctoral-journey/what-qualitative-vs-quantitative-study 

Quantitative research and analysis: Quantitative methods overview. LibGuides. (2021). Retrieved May 7, 2022, from https://lib-guides.letu.edu/quantresearch 

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493

Title:  NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493

There are two main venues of research to assess information and/or data to in-turn be utilized to benefit the medical (or any) field and for the ultimate benefit of the patients and communities served. Quantitative, utilizes QUANTITIES: numbers, measurements, comparisons and may “include studies such as clinical trials, cohort studies and systematic reviews” per. Chambers and Cowdell (2021). Quantitative research seeks to answer the “what” yet vital aspect of a way to study. Wuhan, China compared medical data in a quantitative study including Covid-19 positive patients (191 recruited) and a randomly selected control group of 50 healthy persons (Yufei et al., 2020). This quantitative research provided information regarding an assessment of possible Covid-19 pneumonia and looking at the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) and C-reactive protein level (CRP) per Yufei et al., with findings of substantially elevated levels among Covid-19 patients compared to the healthy volunteers control group (2020). Chambers and Cowdell inform us a gold standard of research is considered the randomized controlled trial which looks at a randomly selected group (for example of patients with a particular disease or illness) that is either placed in the intervention group or the control group (2021). The results are reported via the quantitative research data, yet the value of the patient insight is not to be taken lightly and should be added (which would add the vital qualitative research aspect) (Chambers & Cowdell, 2021).

Qualitative research makes use of words with descriptions, life, color and insight and per Chambers and Cowdell may incorporate interviews and discussion groups to “explore participants’ perspectives” (2021). This venue of research takes into consideration, persons feelings, experiences or beliefs of the “how” and/or the “why” of the question being sought (Chambers & Cowdell, 2021). An example of a qualitative study is a study in Sao Paulo, seeking to gain understanding from health care professionals who provide direct observation treatment for persons with multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) and the benefits derived for future medical professionals to have insight of interactions and care for the patients they served in the midst of Covid-19 (Souza et al., 2021).

If a comparison is needed regarding 2 different medications and their effectiveness, Chambers and Cowdell inform us, a quantitative study would provide the needed data; however if seeking to comprehend patients’/persons’ feelings and experiences with the medication ~ a qualitative study would be provided (2021).

Data, numbers and the “what” of research is vital to glean from, yet we must never forget why the data is being researched … it is for the individuals, families and communities we serve and their insight, information and voice is crucial to see the big and full picture and for us as medical professionals to be able to provide optimal and quality patient care. Care to patients.

References

Chalmers, J., & Cowdell, F. (2021). What Are Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods? A Brief Introduction. Dermatological Nursing, 20(2), 45–48.

Souza, L. L. L., Santos, F. L., dos, Crispim, J. de A., Fiorati, R. C., Dias, S., Bruce, A. T. I, Alves, Y. M. Ramos A.C V., Berra, T. Z., da Costa, F. B. P., Alves, L. S., Monroe, A. A., Fronteria, I. & Arcenio, R. A. (2021). Causes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis from the perspectives of health providers: challenges and strategies for adherence to treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. BMS Health Services Research 21(1) 1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07057-0. PMID: 34592970; PMCID: PMC8483800.

Yufei, Y., Mingli, L., Xuejiao, L., Xuemei, D., Yiming, J., Qin, Q., Hui, S., & Jie, G. (2020). Utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein level for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation, 80(7), 536–540. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/00365513.2020.1803587

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493

Title:  NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493

As qualitative and quantitative studies collect different data, their data collection methods differ considerably. Quantitative studies rely on numerical or measurable data. In contrast, qualitative studies rely on personal accounts or documents that illustrate in detail how people think or respond within society.

Qualitative Research

Qualitative research methods include gathering and interpreting non-numerical data. The following are some sources of qualitative data:1

• Interviews
• Focus groups
• Documents
• Personal accounts or papers
• Cultural records
• Observation

In the course of a qualitative study, the researcher may conduct interviews or focus groups to collect data that is not available in existing documents or records. To allow freedom for varied or unexpected answers, interviews and focus groups may be unstructured or semi-structured.

Reference

Hoover, L., (2021)What Is Qualitative vs. Quantitative Study? https://www.gcu.edu/blog/doctoral-journey/what-qualitative-vs-quantitative-study

A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493

Title:  NAME TWO DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATING EVIDENCE NRS 493

Qualitative data is performed by evaluating non-numeric variables. The data are collected through observation, open-ended questions, or interviews (Ruoqi Yu et al., 2021). Qualitative approach explores and seeks “how” and “why” a particular phenomenon or behavior operates as it does in a particular context. It can be used to generate hypotheses and theories from data (Ruoqi Yu et al., 2021).

Quantitative data is based on evaluating numbers and numeric variables. Quantitative data are based on larger sample sizes, such as population and the study can be replicated or repeated because if it’s reliability. The main aim of the quantitative data is to classify and construct models in an attempt to explain what is observed (Ruoqi Yu et al., 2021).

The difference between Quantitative and Qualitative data are both research methods that collect and analyze data and they allow them to answer different kinds of research questions. Quantitative data is expressed in numbers, graphs and statistical analysis. Qualitative data is mainly expressed in words. It s analyzed by summarizing , categorizing and interpreting.

Ruoqi Yu, Dylan S. Small, David Harding, José Aveldanes, & Paul R. Rosenbaum. (2021). Optimal Matching for Observational Studies That Integrate Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Statistics and Public Policy, 8(1), 42–52. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/2330443X.2021.1919260