NUR 550 Research Design Comparison

Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Research Design Comparison-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Research Design Comparison assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 550 Research Design Comparison                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Research Design Comparison depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 550 Research Design Comparison                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Research Design Comparison is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 550 Research Design Comparison                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 550 Research Design Comparison  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 550 Research Design Comparison                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 550 Research Design Comparison                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 550 Research Design Comparison assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NUR 550 Research Design Comparison Included After Question

NUR 550 Research Design Comparison

NUR 550 Research Design Comparison

The proposed nursing practice problem is the lack of proper nursing education on Covid-19 vaccination. This nursing practice issue is selected because several studies reported that many people showed hesitancy to go for Covid-19 vaccines due to a lack of proper education on the essence of the vaccines in addressing the pandemic

Comparison 1: Translational Research vs. Qualitative Research

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NUR 550 Research Design Comparison:

Criteria	Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link: Berry, S. D., Goldfeld, K. S., McConeghy, K., Gifford, D., Davidson, H. E., Han, L., … & Mor, V. (2022). Evaluating the findings of the IMPACT-C randomized clinical trial to improve COVID-19 vaccine coverage in skilled nursing facilities. JAMA Internal Medicine, 182(3), 324-331. Doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8067 Translational Research Type: T4	Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link: Lockyer, B., Islam, S., Rahman, A., Dickerson, J., Pickett, K., Sheldon, T., … & Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid‐19 Scientific Advisory Group. (2021). Understanding COVID‐19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK. Health Expectations, 24(4), 1158-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13240 Traditional Qualitative Research Type: Phenomenological study type	Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology	This was a randomized controlled trial where a total of 7496 residents and 17963 staff of skilled nursing facilities were recruited. The intervention used was a multi-component approach with education regarding vaccination as the pillar.	This was a qualitative study conducted in the UK, where a total of 20 participants were involved. The study used in-depth phone interviews to interview individuals from different ethnic groups. A reflective thematic analysis was then conducted.	While the translational research used a randomized controlled trial and education at the center multi-component approach, qualitative research used in-depth interviews.
Goals	The main goal of this study was to find out if a multi-component vaccine education and campaign would increase COVID-19 vaccination rates among residents and staff in skilled nursing facilities.	The main goal of this study was to understand people’s COVID-19 beliefs, attitudes, and their interaction with information and misinformation during the COVID 19	Both research studies focused on issues surrounding vaccine uptake.
Data Collection	Data were mainly collected or obtained from the resident’s electronic medical record using the PointClick Care platform. Such data included vaccination status, minimum data set assessments, codes from the status or admission updates, and census data.	The data was collected through in-depth phone interviews and transcripts obtained from the recorded interviews.	While the translational research used electronic medical records as the major strategy for data collection, the qualitative research used in-depth phone interviews.

Comparison 2: Translational Research vs. Quantitative Research

Criteria	Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link: Zolotarova, T., Dussault, C., Park, H., Varsaneux, O., Basta, N. E., Watson, L., … & Kronfli, N. (2023). Education increases COVID-19 vaccine uptake among people in Canadian federal prisons in a prospective randomized controlled trial: The EDUCATE study. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.040 Translational Research Type: T4	Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link: Li, P. C., Theis, S. R., Kelly, D., Ocampo, T., Berglund, A., Morgan, D., … & Burtson, K. (2022). Impact of an education intervention on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a military base population. Military Medicine, 187(Special Issue_13), e1516-e1522. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab363 Traditional Quantitative Research Type: Correlational research type	Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology	This was a randomized controlled trial where patients who were unwilling to be vaccinated were randomized into two groups; an intervention group that received education and a control group.	This was a correlational study where a curriculum for vaccine hesitancy consisting of a PowerPoint presentation and a question-and-answer session was conducted. The educational content involved the effects of COVID-19, information on the vaccines, and common concerns or myths surrounding vaccines.	The translational research used an EDUCATE program as the major intervention, while the quantitative research used a PowerPoint presentation to deliver an educational program to the participants.
Goals	The purpose of this research was to evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine.	The major goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of educational programs on the hesitancy of taking the COVID-19 vaccine and reduce the rates of vaccine hesitancy.	Both research studies focused on determining the impact of educational intervention on COVID-19 uptake and vaccine hesitancy.
Data Collection	The data for this research was achieved by two self-administered paper questionnaires.	Data were mainly collected through a post-seminar questionnaire using SurveyMonkey. The questionnaire items were age, occupation, concerns before the seminar (and if they had been addressed), post-seminar opinion of the vaccine, the plan regarding COVID-19 vaccination, degree of trust in health care professionals, helpfulness of the seminar, and whether or not they would recommend the vaccine to others.	Both research studies used questionnaires to collect data, even though the questionnaires were formatted differently.

NUR 550 Research Design Comparison References

Berry, S. D., Goldfeld, K. S., McConeghy, K., Gifford, D., Davidson, H. E., Han, L., … & Mor, V. (2022). Evaluating the findings of the IMPACT-C randomized clinical trial to improve COVID-19 vaccine coverage in skilled nursing facilities. JAMA Internal Medicine, 182(3), 324-331. Doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8067

Lockyer, B., Islam, S., Rahman, A., Dickerson, J., Pickett, K., Sheldon, T., … & Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid‐19 Scientific Advisory Group. (2021). Understanding COVID‐19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK. Health Expectations, 24(4), 1158-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13240

Li, P. C., Theis, S. R., Kelly, D., Ocampo, T., Berglund, A., Morgan, D., … & Burtson, K. (2022). Impact of an education intervention on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a military base population. Military Medicine, 187(Special Issue_13), e1516-e1522. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab363

Zolotarova, T., Dussault, C., Park, H., Varsaneux, O., Basta, N. E., Watson, L., … & Kronfli, N. (2023). Education increases COVID-19 vaccine uptake among people in Canadian federal prisons in a prospective randomized controlled trial: The EDUCATE study. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.040

The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on diferent research designs to better understand
their designs and application. Understanding the diferent types of research design is important so that nurses
can efectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and ofer better patient care.
You will utilize your approved nursing practice problem to complete the evidence-based practice project
proposal assignments for this course and NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a
fnal written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Review feedback from your instructor on your “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identifcation of
Nursing Practice Problem,” submitted in Topic 1. If your original proposed nursing problem was outside the
scope of nursing practice or not conducive to an evidence-based practice project proposal, work with your
instructor to identify a new topic prior to beginning this assignment. If your proposed topic requires revision,
complete this prior to beginning this assignment.
Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Find two translational research
articles, one quantitative article, and one qualitative article. Using the “Translational Research Graphic
Organizer,” present your proposed topic and, in the tables provided, compare one translational study to the
quantitative study, and one translational study to the qualitative study.
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of
the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published
within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Page 11 Grand Canyon University 2023 © Prepared on: Jan 20, 2023

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and
documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar
with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Explain why biostatistics is important in population health research.

Biostatistics may assist determine the best efficient treatment strategy for a given population. This demands research techniques that support the investigation of the relationship between the individual patient and population reactions. On a microbiological level, such a study is now possible. Biostatisticians play an important role in public health, supporting scientists in assisting patient care assessments, better concentrating medical research, and making sense of all the available data.

The role of epidemiology in community health research and intervention.

 Epidemiology detects illness spreading, reasons behind its source and cause, and strategies for their management; this requires knowledge of how political, social, and scientific variables interact to increase disease risk, making epidemiology a distinctive discipline. The health of populations is influenced by a variety of variables. Epidemiology is a branch of medicine that studies the state of people’s health, identifies risk factors, and investigates the links between health and various harmful substances.

How are epidemiology and biostatistics significant to your evidence-based practice proposal?

Biostatistics may support determining the best efficient treatment strategy for a given population. The objective of epidemic control is to not only discover the best approach to treat an affected person, but also to limit the spread of the disease across the community. Epidemiologists assist us in determining where a disease begins and who it is most susceptible to affect when it strikes a community. The data attained will be utilized to limit the disease’s spread and prevent future outbreaks. In recent years, the profession of public health has advocated for more evidence-based practice. Traditional epidemiological study methodologies borrowed from clinical medicine are often inadequate to draw findings that guide policy or practice at the population level due to the dynamic nature and complexity of public health evidence. Evidence-based public health practice aims to improve population health by combining science-based treatments with community desires.

References

Falzer, P. R. (2021). Evidence‐based medicine’s curious path: From clinical epidemiology to patient‐centered care through decision analysis. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 27(3), 631-637.

Newman, A. B., Kritchevsky, S. B., Guralnik, J. M., Cummings, S. R., Salive, M., Kuchel, G. A., … & Ferrucci, L. (2020). Accelerating the search for interventions aimed at expanding the health span in humans: the role of epidemiology. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 75(1), 77-86.

Rao, P. S., & Richard, J. (2012). Introduction to biostatistics and research methods. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NUR 550 Research Design Comparison

Title: NUR 550 Research Design Comparison