NR 443 RN Week 6 Direct Care Project Part 4: Evaluating the Project 

Sample Answer for NR 443 RN Week 6 Direct Care Project Part 4: Evaluating the Project Included After Question

NR 443 RN Week 6 Direct Care Project Part 4: Evaluating the Project 

NR 443 RN Week 6 Direct Care Project Part 4: Evaluating the Project 

Directions: Use this template to evaluate your project. For more information on the template sections, see the Directions for Part 4 and the Direct Care Project Part 4 Tutorial.

1. Title of presentation:
2. Date presentation completed
3. Tables of results:

PRE-Survey

POST-Survey

4. Interpretation of results:
5. Overall experience with the project:
6. Summary of the outcomes:
7. Barriers in the project:
8. Implications for future practice:]

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

4. Participation Guidelines
   You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline.
5. Grading Rubric
   Discussion Criteria
    A
   (100%)
   Outstanding or highest level of performance  B
   (87%)
   Very good or high level of performance C
   (76%)
   Competent or satisfactory level of performance F
   (0)
   Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
   Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.
   16 points

Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.

16 points

Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.

14 points

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.

12 points

Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).

0 points

Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.*
( APA format not required)
12 points

Integrates evidence to support your discussion from:

assigned readings** OR online lessons, AND
at least one outside scholarly source.***
Sources are credited.*

12 points

Integrates evidence to support discussion from:

assigned readings OR online lesson.
Sources are credited.*

10 points

Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson.

Sources are credited.*

9 points

Does not integrate any evidence.

0 points

Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.
14 points

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

14 points

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

12 points

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.

10 points

No response post to another student or instructor.

0 points

Communicates in a professional manner.
8 points

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

8 points

Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

7 points

Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

6 points

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

0 points

PARTICIPATION:
Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) by
Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.

0 points lost

Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

-5 points

Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

PARTICIPATION
Total posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days.

0 points lost

Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.

-5 points

Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.

NOTES:

• Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required.

** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.

*** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 443 RN Week 6 Direct Care Project Part 4: Evaluating the Project

Title: NR 443 RN Week 6 Direct Care Project Part 4: Evaluating the Project