HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies

HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies

HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies

 

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to contrast common project management methodologies that can be utilized in health care project management. Conduct your own research so you are able to contrast Lean/Six Sigma, Waterfall, PSDA, and Agile methodologies. In addition, select another project management methodology of your choice.

Use the Project Management Methodologies template to complete the assignment.

This assignment requires two to three scholarly resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

Resources

Collapse All

9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple

Read “9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple,” by Aston, located on the Digital Project Manager websi

… Read More

https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/project-management-methodologies-made-simple/

Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today

Read “Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today,” by Hakim, from Physician Leadership Journal (2019).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.579714743&site=eds-live&scope=site

Project Management: Case Studies

Read “Project Management Methodologies” in Project Management: Case Studies.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01182a&AN=gcu.317842&site=eds-live&scope=site

How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project

Read “How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project,” by Silver et al., from American Society of Nephrology (2016).

https://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/clinjasn/11/5/893.full.pdf

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read Chapters 1 and 2 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement

Read “A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement,” by Tremblay Aubry, R

… Read More

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00126450-201801000-00002&D=ovft&PDF=y

Top Project Management Methodologies 2019

View “Top Project Management Methodologies 2019,” from KnowledgeHut, located on YouTube.

Project Management for Healthcare

Read the “Safety” and “Regulatory” sections of Chapter 2 in “Project Management for Healthcare,” by Shirley (2011

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.or

HQS-620 Project Management Methodologies Template

Directions: Research information about the project management methodologies listed below to complete the table. In addition, conduct your own research on other project management methodologies and include this in the table below. The assignment requires a minimum of two or three scholarly resources. A resource may be used more than once in the last column of the template.

Project Management Methodology	Description	Pros	Cons	Example of when this methodology would be appropriate	Scholarly Resource
Lean/Six Sigma
Waterfall
PDSA
Agile
Choose an additional project management methodology here

 

Project Management Methodologies – Rubric

Collapse All

Lean/Six Sigma

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Lean/Six Sigma

5. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are not present.

Waterfall

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Waterfall

5. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for Waterfall are not present.

PDSA

14.4 points

Criteria Description

PDSA

5. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for PDSA are present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for PDSA are present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for PDSA are present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for PDSA are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for PDSA are not present.

Agile

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Agile

5. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for Agile are present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for Agile are present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for Agile are present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for Agile are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for Agile are not present.

Additional Project Management Methodology

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Additional Project Management Methodology

5. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are not present.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

4 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. 5: Excellent

4 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. 4: Good

3.68 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. 3: Satisfactory

3.52 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources

4 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. 5: Excellent

4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. 4: Good

3.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. 3: Satisfactory

3.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.