HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners Unit 7 and 8 Discussion
HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners Unit 7 and 8 Discussion
HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners
Unit 7 Discussion
DQ1 Legal Issues, Ethical Considerations and Risk Management
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners Unit 7 and 8 Discussion done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Legal issues, ethical considerations and risk management (insurance) – In your opinion, what is the relationship among these topics as they relate to NP’s?
Define/describe what each of these are.
Describe how each of these are interrelated.
Provide an example of how ethics is interrelated into the legal issues of malpractice.
Provide a journal summary to support your ideas.
Please use ANA Code of Ethical Standards to guide the ethics discussion.
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
DQ2 APRN Professional Resume
Upload your APRN resume to Blackboard in week 7 Reflective Discussion.
This is a peer review activity.
Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt [Due Sunday]
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners
Unit 8 Discussion
Reflection
Please respond to the following questions based upon these course objectives:
Analyze nursing history to expand thinking and provide a sense of professional heritage and identity.
Understand other health professions’ scopes of practice to maximize contributions within the healthcare team.
Use leadership skills to teach, coach, and mentor other members of the healthcare team.
Articulate a personal philosophy and framework acknowledging professional and accrediting agency competencies relating to the role and scope of practice of the advanced practice nurse.
Please answer the following questions with supporting examples and full explanations.
For each of the learning objectives, provide an analysis of how the course supported each objective.
Explain how the material learned in this course, based upon the objectives, will be applicable to professional application.
Provide evidence (citations and references) to support your statements and opinions. Responses to these questions are due by Tuesday at noon.
Note: The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range (example: 25–20 points, 20–15 points, 15–10 points, 10–0 points).
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Needs Improvement | Inadequate | Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of Initial Post | Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words).
All components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is applied. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 25 points |
Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words).
Most components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is applied but limited. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 20 points |
Initial post is one day late.
Does not meet the correct length (500–750 words). Some components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is weak or missing. References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions. 15 points |
Initial post is more than one day late.
Initial post much fewer than (500–750 words). Few components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is missing. References are not included. 10 points |
25 |
| Peer Replies | On time.
There was substantial evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions and new information. Replies are 200–400 words. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 25 points |
On time. There was some evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions or new information.
Replies are 200–400 words. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 20 points |
There was either some synthesis of course content or the introduction of questions or new information.
Replies are less than 200 words. References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions. 15 points |
There was little or no evidence of course content utilizing course topics or the introduction of questions or new information.
Replies are less than 200 words References are not included. 10 points |
25 |
| Frequency of Contribution | Initial post with two peer replies posted on two separate days.
25 points |
Initial post with two peer replies posted on the same day.
20 points |
Initial post with one peer reply.
15 points |
Only initial post submitted or only replied to peers.
10 points |
25 |
| Organization, Writing Mechanics, and APA Format | Clearly organized, no or limited writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
25 points |
Clearly organized, few to some writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
20 points |
Poorly organized, several to moderate writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
15 points |
Poorly organized, many writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
10 points |
25 |
| Total points | 100 | ||||
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.