HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners Unit 5 Discussion
HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners
Unit 5 Discussion
DQ1 Conflict in the Workplace
All of us have been involved in various kinds of conflicts related to our work environment. Using a situation that you were involved in, describe the conflict and how it was handled.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners Unit 5 Discussion done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Was the outcome positive or negative?
How did the involved parties feel about the resolution, did they feel that they were heard, that their issues were resolved in an appropriate manner?
Based on what you have read in this unit, what could have been done to improve both the situation and the outcome?
What is professional civility/incivility?
How does this impact professional relationships an patient care outcomes?
What incivility literature evidence is available that supports that conflict resolution impacts work environments and patient care?
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
DQ2 Complimentary Therapy
This discussion has two parts:
1A. Using the National Center for Complimentary and Integrated Health (NCCIH) at https://nccih.nih.gov/, provide research about a complementary therapy.
Provide a summary overview of the therapy.
What evidence is there about providing care for patients of all cultures.
Discuss how you would work with a patient to integrate the therapy into his/her care plan.
1B. Using transcultural care concepts, provide evidence-based practice guidelines that illustrate how linguistic challenges interfere with culturally competent care.
What are the safety concerns for APRN providers?
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Note: The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range (example: 25–20 points, 20–15 points, 15–10 points, 10–0 points).
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Needs Improvement | Inadequate | Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of Initial Post | Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words). All components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is applied. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 25 points | Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words). Most components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is applied but limited. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 20 points | Initial post is one day late. Does not meet the correct length (500–750 words). Some components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is weak or missing. References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions. 15 points | Initial post is more than one day late. Initial post much fewer than (500–750 words). Few components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is missing. References are not included. 10 points | 25 |
| Peer Replies | On time. There was substantial evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions and new information. Replies are 200–400 words. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 25 points | On time. There was some evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions or new information. Replies are 200–400 words. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 20 points | There was either some synthesis of course content or the introduction of questions or new information. Replies are less than 200 words. References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions. 15 points | There was little or no evidence of course content utilizing course topics or the introduction of questions or new information. Replies are less than 200 words References are not included. 10 points | 25 |
| Frequency of Contribution | Initial post with two peer replies posted on two separate days. 25 points | Initial post with two peer replies posted on the same day. 20 points | Initial post with one peer reply. 15 points | Only initial post submitted or only replied to peers. 10 points | 25 |
| Organization, Writing Mechanics, and APA Format | Clearly organized, no or limited writing mechanics and/or APA errors. 25 points | Clearly organized, few to some writing mechanics and/or APA errors. 20 points | Poorly organized, several to moderate writing mechanics and/or APA errors. 15 points | Poorly organized, many writing mechanics and/or APA errors. 10 points | 25 |
| Total points | 100 | ||||
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.