HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners Unit 3 Discussion
HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners
Unit 3 Discussion
DQ1 Nurse Advocates
Based on your experiences and readings, analyze the roles, empowerment of patients, and values needed to be an effective nurse advocate and policy player.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on HERZING NU626 Roles for Nurse Practitioners Unit 3 Discussion done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Discuss the APN role as a change agent.
Provide an example of a time that you have acted as an advocate or a situation that you are familiar with that involved an APN acting as an advocate.
Additionally, address how the APN role is implemented at an organizations, state, and national level.
The text discusses the limited evidence base for the credibility of advocacy, in your opinion does it work?
Why or why not? Support your thoughts with evidence.
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
DQ2 Evidence-Based Policy
Research and evidence based practice are integral to advanced practice nursing. Describe how you will demonstrate/utilize these to set yourself apart as an “excellent” APN.
Provide an example of an evidence based policy that you would like to implement in your practice. How will you implement it?
Provide the details of working through organization structures in obtaining feedback from your staff and organization on how to implement it.
Explore the AHRQ website (Links to an external site.) and pick a quality care initiative that may impact quality client care in hospitals or areas of industry that deliver health care.
Read a few case studies in the “AHRQ’s Impact on Health Care” and pick 2. Compare and Contrast how the AHRQ research or evidence behind these case studies improves client care outcomes.
Instructions:
Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts. To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:
Do you agree with your peers’ assessment?
Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion.
Share your thoughts on how you support their opinion and explain why.
Present new references that support your opinions.
Note: The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range (example: 25–20 points, 20–15 points, 15–10 points, 10–0 points).
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Needs Improvement | Inadequate | Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of Initial Post | Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words).
All components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is applied. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 25 points |
Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words).
Most components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is applied but limited. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 20 points |
Initial post is one day late.
Does not meet the correct length (500–750 words). Some components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is weak or missing. References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions. 15 points |
Initial post is more than one day late.
Initial post much fewer than (500–750 words). Few components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is missing. References are not included. 10 points |
25 |
| Peer Replies | On time.
There was substantial evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions and new information. Replies are 200–400 words. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 25 points |
On time. There was some evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions or new information.
Replies are 200–400 words. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 20 points |
There was either some synthesis of course content or the introduction of questions or new information.
Replies are less than 200 words. References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions. 15 points |
There was little or no evidence of course content utilizing course topics or the introduction of questions or new information.
Replies are less than 200 words References are not included. 10 points |
25 |
| Frequency of Contribution | Initial post with two peer replies posted on two separate days.
25 points |
Initial post with two peer replies posted on the same day.
20 points |
Initial post with one peer reply.
15 points |
Only initial post submitted or only replied to peers.
10 points |
25 |
| Organization, Writing Mechanics, and APA Format | Clearly organized, no or limited writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
25 points |
Clearly organized, few to some writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
20 points |
Poorly organized, several to moderate writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
15 points |
Poorly organized, many writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
10 points |
25 |
| Total points | 100 | ||||
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.